Moon rise a few nights ago

Thanks to Mary M.

Posted in Photography | Comments Off on Moon rise a few nights ago

The “Say Hey” Kid

Thanks to Pam P.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The “Say Hey” Kid

Feeling unseen?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Feeling unseen?

Juneteenth

On “Freedom’s Eve,” or the eve of January 1, 1863, the first Watch Night services took place. On that night, enslaved and free African Americans gathered in churches and private homes all across the country awaiting news that the Emancipation Proclamation had taken effect. At the stroke of midnight, prayers were answered as all enslaved people in Confederate States were declared legally free. Union soldiers, many of whom were black, marched onto plantations and across cities in the south reading small copies of the Emancipation Proclamation spreading the news of freedom in Confederate States. Only through the Thirteenth Amendment did emancipation end slavery throughout the United States.

But not everyone in Confederate territory would immediately be free. Even though the Emancipation Proclamation was made effective in 1863, it could not be implemented in places still under Confederate control. As a result, in the westernmost Confederate state of Texas, enslaved people would not be free until much later. Freedom finally came on June 19, 1865, when some 2,000 Union troops arrived in Galveston Bay, Texas. The army announced that the more than 250,000 enslaved black people in the state, were free by executive decree. This day came to be known as “Juneteenth,” by the newly freed people in Texas. 

What is the Black national anthem?

James Weldon Johnson’s “Lift Every Voice and Sing,” colloquially known as the Black national anthem, was originally written late in 1899, James Weldon Johnson Foundation president Rufus Jones said. 

Johnson, a renowned author, educator, lawyer and civil rights activist, set out to write a poem to to commemorate President Abraham Lincoln’s birthday, and the piece became a song. His brother, John Rosamond Johnson, composed the music.

Ed note: My daughter is a member of Resounding Love, a gospel choir, which was invited to sing the national anthem and Lift Ev’ry Voice at a special Juneteenth match of the Seattle Reign vs. Portland Thorns at Lumen Field last weekend!

Posted in History, Music, Race | Comments Off on Juneteenth

Sharks Deny Any Interest in Eating Trump

Thanks to Pam P.
(The Borowitz Report)—Calling his longstanding fear of being devoured by them “delusional thinking at its saddest,” the world’s sharks issued a statement on Tuesday disavowing “any interest whatsoever” in eating Donald J. Trump.“Given his constant intake of Diet Coke and hamburgers, there is nothing to indicate that Trump would be anything resembling a nutritious meal,” the sharks’ statement read. “The very thought of biting into him is nauseating.

”The sharks said that Trump’s anxiety about being eaten by them demonstrates “an inflated sense of his appeal, to say the least.”“We thought the same thing when Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claimed he was eaten by a worm,” the sharks wrote. “Why do these narcissists think they’re so delicious?”In perhaps their most withering comment, the sharks concluded, “We might consider eating Trump if the only other thing on the menu was Steve Bannon.”
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Sharks Deny Any Interest in Eating Trump

23 Things That Happened In 2001 That Were Completely Overshadowed By 9/11

Thanks to Bob P.

1. “American Airlines Flight 587. It was an Airbus A300 that crashed in Queens, NY, two months after 9/11. It was the second-deadliest aviation accident in US history, and not well remembered.”

Front view of an American Airlines A300 LuxuryLiner aircraft parked at an airport gate

2. “Air Transat Flight 236. The plane was flying from Toronto to Lisbon, ran out of fuel in the middle of the Atlantic, and glided 75 miles to an airport in the Azores and safely landed. The longest glide of a passenger airliner. It happened three weeks before 9/11.”

3. “George W. Bush issued an executive order banning federal funding for research on any new embryonic stem cell lines going forward. He interrupted evening TV and gave a live address to the nation to announce it on August 9th. His next address to the nation was on September 11th.”

George W. Bush seated in an armchair with hands clasped, in front of an American flag and a window, with a family photo and a binder on a side table

4. “Congressman Gary Condit admitted to having an affair with Chandra Levy, a 24-year-old intern, who had gone missing and was later found murdered.”

A TV screen shows a news interview with a man with short hair on ABC News. The man is speaking seriously. "Primetime Thursday" is displayed on the screen

5. “A paraglider accidentally entangled himself on the torch of the Statue of Liberty.”

Statue of Liberty, viewed from below, holding the torch aloft against a clear sky

(Continued)

Posted in History | Comments Off on 23 Things That Happened In 2001 That Were Completely Overshadowed By 9/11

Father’s Day Essay by Heather Cox Richardson

Thanks to Pam P.

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Posted in Essays, History | Comments Off on Father’s Day Essay by Heather Cox Richardson

Don’t fall for this scam!

Thanks to Ed M.

Posted in Scams | Comments Off on Don’t fall for this scam!

Without a life’s necessity

Posted in Humor | Comments Off on Without a life’s necessity

What Exactly Did Justice Alito Say That Was Wrong?

By Marc O. DeGirolami in the NYT

Mr. DeGirolami is a law professor at the Catholic University of America who specializes in law and religion.

Justice Samuel Alito has been widely criticized this week for remarks he made to a self-described documentary filmmaker who on two occasions engaged him at social events, secretly taped him under false pretenses and released the recordings. What did he say that was wrong?

Nothing. None of his remarks was improper for a judge to make. Furthermore, he did not even say anything especially controversial — or at least nothing that would be controversial in a less polarized moment.

For those who have not heard the recording, here is what happened: Justice Alito assented to the filmmaker’s remark that the country is deeply polarized, and he said that given the depth of our disagreements over various issues and the inability to compromise on them, “one side or the other is going to win.” He stated that nevertheless “there can be a way of working, living together peacefully.”

He said that “American citizens in general need to work on this” — that is, polarization. But he said that solving polarization is not something that the Supreme Court can do, because “we have a very defined role, and we need to do what we’re supposed to do.” He added: “That is way above us.”

In perhaps the most discussed exchange, he assented to the filmmaker’s statement that it is important to win “the moral argument” and “return our country to a place of godliness.”

To start with the question of judicial ethics: Where was the justice’s error? He did not mention any pending case or litigation. He did not name any person or party. He did not discuss any specific political or moral matter. Most of the exchange consists of the filmmaker’s own goading remarks, followed by the justice’s vague and anodyne affirmations and replies. About what you might expect when cornered at a boring cocktail party.

Setting aside judicial ethics, I can think of two possible objections to what Justice Alito said: that he should not hold these views; or that he should not express them in public.

As to whether he should hold these views, I would suggest that they are not so extreme as to merit denunciation. On the contrary, they are reasonable, even commonplace.

Start with his remarks about polarization. Many people across the cultural divide contend that our political fractures involve intractably profound disagreements on which compromise is not possible. That does not mean that in all our disputes we are incapable of agreement (“there can be a way of working, living together peacefully”). But Justice Alito is hardly alone in the view that at least in the larger culture, many things are not amenable to compromise (“one side or the other is going to win”).

Likewise, many people in this country do believe in God and godliness. Many believe in the truth of our national motto, “In God We Trust.” They think religion contributes to a kinder and more moral society. And many of these people — including Justice Alito, to judge from his brief assent on the recording — also think that greater godliness might help the nation today. Americans who think God has something to teach us about decency and love and moral rectitude would be surprised to hear that treated as a shocking or extremist view.

Of course, those who do not believe in God may argue instead that godlessness or secularism is the surest path to becoming a better nation. Both are common, conventional and reasonable positions, however intense the disagreement between them.

As to whether Justice Alito should have expressed his views in public, one might claim that his assent to the filmmaker’s comments about a “return” to “godliness” was improper because it suggests that he would not treat secular parties fairly at the Supreme Court. But this argument assumes that a godly world has no room for peaceable tolerance for disagreement. And this is just what Justice Alito denied in suggesting that “living together peacefully” is a noble ambition toward which Americans should strive. Not only that: He was clear that the Supreme Court is not the place to resolve social and cultural fracture.

I recognize that most of this will not matter to many who are following this story. Those who dislike Justice Alito for other reasons will seize on what they can from this episode to condemn him. Indeed, this is presumably why the filmmaker went to such elaborate lengths to lie to him. Even so, nothing in Justice Alito’s comments merits the denunciation they are receiving, even if one disagrees with what he said. It is in the ginning up of the controversy that we see the real culture war.

Posted in Politics, Religion | 1 Comment

What Have We Liberals Done to the West Coast?

Nicholas Kristof

By Nicholas Kristof

Opinion Columnist, reporting from Portland, Ore. for the NYT

As Democrats make their case to voters around the country this fall, one challenge is that some of the bluest parts of the country — cities on the West Coast — are a mess.

Centrist voters can reasonably ask: Why put liberals in charge nationally when the places where they have greatest control are plagued by homelessness, crime and dysfunction?

I’ll try to answer that question in a moment, but liberals like me do need to face the painful fact that something has gone badly wrong where we’re in charge, from San Diego to Seattle. I’m an Oregonian who bores people at cocktail parties by singing the praises of the West, but the truth is that too often we offer a version of progressivism that doesn’t result in progress.

We are more likely to believe that “housing is a human right” than conservatives in Florida or Texas, but less likely to actually get people housed. We accept a yawning gulf between our values and our outcomes.

Conservatives argue that the problem is simply the left. Michael Shellenberger wrote a tough book denouncing what he called “San Fransicko” with the subtitle “Why Progressives Ruin Cities.” Yet that doesn’t ring true to me.

Democratic states enjoy a life expectancy two years longer than Republican states. Per capita G.D.P. in Democratic states is 29 percent higher than in G.O.P. states, and child poverty is lower. Education is generally better in blue states, with more kids graduating from high school and college. The gulf in well-being between blue states and red states is growing wider, not narrower.

So my rejoinder to Republican critiques is: Yes, governance is flawed in some blue parts of America, but overall, liberal places have enjoyed faster economic growth and higher living standards than conservative places. That doesn’t look like failure.

So the problem isn’t with liberalism. It’s with West Coast liberalism. (continued)

Posted in Economics, Essays, Government, Homeless, Housing, Politics, Poverty, Social justice | Comments Off on What Have We Liberals Done to the West Coast?

When asked to change, the answer is …..

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on When asked to change, the answer is …..

The Woman Who Could Smell Parkinson’s

She first noticed the scent on her husband. Now her abilities are helping unlock new research in early disease detection.

By Scott Sayare in the NYT: Scott Sayare is a writer in New York. He interviewed doctors, researchers, caregivers and patients over several months for this article.

As a boy, Les Milne carried an air of triumph about him, and an air of sorrow. Les was a particularly promising and energetic young man, an all-Scottish swim champion, head boy at his academy in Dundee, a top student bound for medical school. But when he was young, his father died; his mother was institutionalized with a diagnosis of manic depression, and he and his younger brother were effectively left to fend for themselves. His high school girlfriend, Joy, was drawn to him as much by his sadness as his talents, by his yearning for her care. “We were very, very much in love,” Joy, now a flaxen-haired 72-year-old grandmother, told me recently. In a somewhat less conventional way, she also adored the way Les smelled, and this aroma of salt and musk, accented with a suggestion of leather from the carbolic soap he used at the pool, formed for her a lasting sense of who he was. “It was just him,” Joy said, a steadfast marker of his identity, no less distinctive than his face, his voice, his particular quality of mind.

Joy’s had always been an unusually sensitive nose, the inheritance, she believes, of her maternal line. Her grandmother was a “hyperosmic,” and she encouraged Joy, as a child, to make the most of her abilities, quizzing her on different varieties of rose, teaching her to distinguish the scent of the petals from the scent of the leaves from the scent of the pistils and stamens. Still, her grandmother did not think odor of any kind to be a polite topic of conversation, and however rich and enjoyable and dense with information the olfactory world might be, she urged her granddaughter to keep her experience of it to herself. Les only learned of Joy’s peculiar nose well after their relationship began, on a trip to the Scandinavian far north. Joy would not stop going on about the creamy odor of the tundra, or what she insisted was the aroma of the cold itself.

Joy planned to go off to university in Paris or Rome. Faced with the prospect of tending to his mother alone, however, Les begged her to stay in Scotland. He trained as a doctor, she as a nurse; they married during his residency. He was soon the sort of capable young physician one might hope to meet, a practitioner of uncommon enthusiasm, and shortly after his 30th birthday, he was appointed consultant anesthesiologist at Macclesfield District General Hospital, outside Manchester, in England, the first in his graduating class to make consultant.

The Milnes installed themselves in an ancient stone farmhouse high on a country hill in Cheshire. By then they had three young sons, and the edifice, which was old enough to be listed in the Domesday Book of 1086, was a happy, never-ending project. They threw elaborate, boozy dinner parties; they kept geese and hens and took in stray cats, dogs, a duck. “We just seemed to get on and do things,” Joy told me. Friends still liken her to Mary Poppins, part twinkly magic, part no frills practicality. She considers herself to be a “never-stop person,” she said. Her husband was the same.

Les spent long hours in the surgical theater, which in Macclesfield had little in the way of ventilation, and Joy typically found that he came home smelling of anesthetics, antiseptics and blood. But he returned one August evening in 1982, shortly after his 32nd birthday, smelling of something new and distinctly unsavory, of some thick must. From then on, the odor never ceased, though neither Les nor almost anyone but his wife could detect it. For Joy, even a small shift in her husband’s aroma might have been cause for distress, but his scent now seemed to have changed fundamentally, as if replaced by that of someone else. She thought he smelled vaguely of his mother. (continued)

Posted in Essays, Health | Comments Off on The Woman Who Could Smell Parkinson’s

Ruling from the bench

Thanks to Pam P.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Ruling from the bench

The price of wind according to MTG

Thanks to Pam P.

Marjorie Taylor Greene Warns That Windmills Will Drive up Cost of Wind Jun 13     READ IN APP   Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images LAS VEGAS (The Borowitz Report)—

Speaking at a campaign rally on Thursday, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene warned that plans to build more wind turbines in the US would “send wind prices through the roof.”

“If you think you’re paying a lot for wind now, just wait until Biden starts building all the windmills he wants,” she said. “Joe Biden is coming for your wind!”

Painting a dark picture of the havoc wind power will wreak on the American consumer, she said, “It’s simple economics. If you have ten windmills, wind will cost ten times as much.”

In her most dire prediction, she declared, “Mark my words: You will be paying four dollars for a gallon of wind.”
Posted in Satire | Comments Off on The price of wind according to MTG

What’s your wish at the Pearly Gates

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on What’s your wish at the Pearly Gates

Heather Cox Richardson – Contrasting facts to Trump lies

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Posted in Economics, Essays, Government, Justice, Politics | Comments Off on Heather Cox Richardson – Contrasting facts to Trump lies

Liar, Liar Pants on Fire!

Thanks to Mike C.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Liar, Liar Pants on Fire!

Antioxidants – food, supplements or neither?

Ed note: Dr. Mehmet Oz has been an unfortunate voice hyping fat-burning supplements sending sales skyrocketing. He has been called to task by congress and has undergone searing critiques of his “flowery language” and health claims promoting questionable products. Unfortunately lobbyists have been successful in keeping supplements away from regulation by the FDA>

A multi-billion dollar myth by Dennis Benjamin (thanks to Ed M.)

In the world of food marketing, there is one attribute required to elevate a product to a super-food—the presence of antioxidants. Unfortunately, there is a dirty big secret. They do little or nothing. There is no scientific evidence that they benefit human health. Some have recently even suggested that they may cause more harm than good. Almost half the population in the USA takes supplements containing one or more antioxidants, such as Vitamin C and E—it is a multibillion-dollar business, all for naught.

Type ‘antioxidant’ into Google, and you get 444 million hits. The National Library of Medicine (PubMed) lists 24,379 articles, of which 4277 are clinical trials, and 516 have produced results, some of which are published. I confess that I did not read every one, but the overwhelming majority were studies focused on a single disease, and most used physiological measurements and not outcomes. I could not uncover large studies performed on the general population demonstrating the prevention of any disease or the delay of decay or death. The largest review showed increased mortality with some antioxidant supplements.

How did we get to the point that almost everyone believes that antioxidants are beneficial, from preventing cancer to slowing aging? It began in the mid-1940s as a purely theoretical idea. Being an oxygen-breathing species, we are vulnerable to rusting, and some oxygen molecules split to become ‘free radicals,’ aka reactive oxygen species (ROSs). These highly reactive molecules have both beneficial and potentially detrimental effects. It is somewhat like the phrase we use for the opposite sex—we can’t live with them, and we can’t live without them.

ROS functions in cell signaling, turning various vital cellular functions on and off. They also play crucial roles in cell metabolism, including photo-protection and stress tolerance. They are a normal product of all cells. However, they can also damage DNA, proteins, cell membranes, and other cellular components. This led some to hypothesize they may be responsible for aging and a host of human diseases. None of these hypotheses, including the aging paradigm, have ever been proven.

From its theoretical beginning, despite never being validated, the obvious extrapolation was ‘let’s get rid of them”. Our bodies already have a variety of systems readily available to scarf up these ROSs. The scientific terms for this activity are quench or scavenge. In the typical situation, there is a delicate balance between production and removal depending on the time and place within a cell. But what if that was not enough to remove them? How about adding more from our food or even better supplements and nutraceuticals? Thus, the ‘health’ food store shelves expanded their offerings, and an advertising avalanche convinced us that we could stay young forever. Power to the pomegranate, porcinis, and polypores. (continued)

Posted in Health, nutrition | Comments Off on Antioxidants – food, supplements or neither?

Justice Alito Caught on Tape Discussing How Battle for America ‘Can’t Be Compromised’

In a new, secret recording, the Supreme Court justice says he “agrees” that the U.S. should return to a place of godliness

BY  TESSA STUARTTIM DICKINSON in Rolling Stone (thanks to Mike C.)

JUNE 10, 2024

Justice Samuel Alito sits during a group photo of the Justices at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021. (Photo by Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images)
Justice Samuel Alito at the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on April 23, 2021. ERIN SCHAFF-POOL/GETTY IMAGES

Justice Samuel Alito spoke candidly about the ideological battle between the left and the right — discussing the difficulty of living “peacefully” with ideological opponents in the face of “fundamental” differences that “can’t be compromised.” He endorsed what his interlocutor described as a necessary fight to “return our country to a place of godliness.” And Alito offered a blunt assessment of how America’s polarization will ultimately be resolved: “One side or the other is going to win.”

Alito made these remarks in conversation at the Supreme Court Historical Society’s annual dinner on June 3, a function that is known to right-wing activists as an opportunity to buttonhole Supreme Court justices. His comments were recorded by Lauren Windsor, a liberal documentary filmmaker. Windsor attended the dinner as a dues-paying member of the society under her real name, along with a colleague. She asked questions of the justice as though she were a religious conservative. Click here for the video link on X.

The justice’s unguarded comments highlight the degree to which Alito makes little effort to present himself as a neutral umpire calling judicial balls and strikes, but rather as a partisan member of a hard-right judicial faction that’s empowered to make life-altering decisions for every American. 

The recording, which was provided exclusively to Rolling Stone, captures Windsor approaching Alito at the event and reminding him that they spoke at the same function the year before, when she asked him a question about political polarization. In the intervening year, she tells the justice, her views on the matter had changed. “I don’t know that we can negotiate with the left in the way that needs to happen for the polarization to end,” Windsor says. “I think that it’s a matter of, like, winning.” 

“I think you’re probably right,” Alito replies. “On one side or the other — one side or the other is going to win. I don’t know. I mean, there can be a way of working — a way of living together peacefully, but it’s difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised. They really can’t be compromised. So it’s not like you are going to split the difference.”

Windsor goes on to tell Alito: “People in this country who believe in God have got to keep fighting for that — to return our country to a place of godliness.”

“I agree with you. I agree with you,” replies Alito, who authored the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision, which reversed five decades of settled law and ended a constitutional right to abortion. (continued)

Posted in Law, Politics, Religion | Comments Off on Justice Alito Caught on Tape Discussing How Battle for America ‘Can’t Be Compromised’

Quote from David Sedaris

Thanks to Dan S.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Quote from David Sedaris

Milton Berle Quotes

Thanks to MaryLou P.

You can lead a man to Congress, but you can’t make him think.

My doctor told me that jogging could add years to my life. I think he was right. I feel ten years older already.

You’re aging when your actions creak louder than your words.

My wife and I have a perfect understanding. I don’t try to run her life, and I don’t try to run mine.

Folk who don’t know why America is the Land of Promise should be here during an election campaign.

Money can’t buy you happiness. It just helps you look for it in more places.

A committee is a group that keeps minutes and loses hours.

We owe a lot to Thomas Edison – if it wasn’t for him, we’d be watching television by candlelight.

In Washington, a man gets up to speak and doesn’t say a thing, and the other men disagree with him for three hours.

They’ve got plastic Christmas trees now. They’re hard to tell from the real aluminum ones.

It’s rough to go through life with your contents looking as if they settled during shipping.

Experience is what you have after you’ve forgotten her name.

I bought my kid an educational toy to help him make it through life. No matter how you put it together, it’s wrong.

– From AZquotes.com

Posted in Humor, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Milton Berle Quotes

News from the Memory Hub

Please click here for the latest information from this important resource in our First Hill neighborhood.

Posted in Caregiving, Dementia, Uncategorized | Comments Off on News from the Memory Hub

Freeway Park Newsletter

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Posted in In the Neighborhood, Parks, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Freeway Park Newsletter

It lasted until the end

Ed note: The stories and pictures of D-day remind me of my patient, Harold. He was one of the many heroes of that day, a day which affected his emotional well being until his life’s end. I wrote about Harold in Facing Death: Finding Dignity, Hope and Healing at the End.

I always looked forward to Harold’s visits. Harold knew that he had life threatening pulmonary fibrosis. He also knew that doctors didn’t have the faintest idea what was causing this, even though they used rather toxic medications to keep it under control. Prednisone seemed to work best.

Somehow, Harold forgave me for all the shortcomings of medical science. He liked to chat about his life during office visits: his grandson playing football at Notre Dame; his granddaughter who loved soccer; the holiday celebrations that were special in his family. Over time I thought I had gotten to know Harold pretty well. But did I, really?

He would come in cheerful and bubbling, with a tendency to wave off such symptoms as shortness of breath. His lungs were progressively filling with scar tissue, which blocked oxygen from getting into his blood effectively. A portable oxygen system helped, and Harold accepted it with grace. With his wife present we had some serious discussions about end-of-life questions, and he had completed an advance directive affirming that did not want to be placed on a breathing machine unless doctors were confident he could return to a meaningful existence. His wife would be in charge if he was unable to make decisions.

One day, during a routine visit in the office, I noted that Harold’s severe lung dysfunction had been quite stable for more than a year. “Harold,” I said casually, “you know you’re really lucky to still be alive.” I meant to be encouraging, but my patient burst into tears.

“What’s going on,” I said rather helplessly. “Did I say something wrong?”

“You don’t know how lucky I really am to be alive.”

“What do you mean?”

“I was a paratrooper on D-Day,” Harold said. “I came down behind the German lines like all my buddies. I didn’t know where I was or where they were. It was pure terror. I saw all these terrible things, and I shot a lot of people. It’s never out of my mind.”

I immediately realized my cluelessness. I didn’t know Harold well at all. Here was a true WWII hero trying to live a normal family life, trying to fight a serious illness, yet suffering from disabling post-traumatic stress disorder from fifty years past. Somehow, I hadn’t found a way to listen deeply enough.

Harold’s defenses took hold again rapidly.

“I’m sorry, Doctor. Sometimes it just grabs me.”

I tried to reach out and refer him for counseling, but Harold would have none of it. “Doc, it’s OK. I don’t want to see some shrink.”

In future office visits he continued to deflect questions about PTSD, though Harold’s wife confided that he had frequent night terrors, shouting in his sleep and awaking drenched with sweat.

Harold survived two more years until his pulmonary fibrosis finally caused his demise. I wish I could say that his death was peaceful, but as he weakened the terrors took hold and would not leave. Our palliative care team used enough sedation and narcotics to essentially put him in a medically induced coma. Harold’s PTSD didn’t really die until he did.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on It lasted until the end