Two Japanese TV Show Contestants Act As a Single Gymnast Performing a Pommel Horse Routine

Thanks to Bob P.

Posted in Fitness, Humor | Comments Off on Two Japanese TV Show Contestants Act As a Single Gymnast Performing a Pommel Horse Routine

Will this symbol stand?

Thanks to Pam P.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Will this symbol stand?

Scott Pelley speaks to 2025 graduates

Thanks to Mike C.

Good morning, everybody. What a beautiful day. What a beautiful North Carolina day for a graduation. Incredible.

Thank you, President Wente, Provost Gillespie, members of the Board of Trustees and Katy Harriger, my faculty sponsor, for this precious Wake Forest honorary degree. I am honored and grateful to be with you today.

Good morning, graduates! A special shout out to our Reserve Officer Training Corps members who are going to be commissioned today in the service of their country today. Thank you so much.

Oh, this has been a challenging road. You have worked, you have worried and you have wondered if you could reach this day. I’m not talking about the graduates; I’m talking to the parents and the families.

Why are there so many people here? Because nobody got here alone.

First, a quick word of warning. I was reporting a story for 60 Minutes not too long ago, and I had a chat with a young astronomer. And I asked her, “So, what took you into astronomy?” She said, “Well, you spoke at my college graduation…”

And she went on and she said, “I was graduating with a perfectly sensible degree. But as I heard you speak, I realized my love was astronomy, so I re-enrolled. Now, I have a Ph.D. in astronomy and now I work on the Webb Space Telescope.”

So, if there is anyone here today who does not want to be an astronomer, this is the time to space out.

You know, if we were in London, we might be walking past Portman Square on a beautiful spring day. We would encounter the headquarters of the British Broadcasting Corporation, a nearly 100-year-old building from which Edward R. Murrow, the original CBS News correspondent, stood on the roof and broadcast back to America word of the falling bombs of fascism that fell on that free city month after month. If we walk a little bit further past the BBC, we will encounter another hero in the fight against fascism, George Orwell. He’d be standing there, frozen in bronze with his words carved in the side of a building: “If liberty means anything at all, it means something worth saying that some people don’t want to hear.”

I fear there are some people in the audience who don’t want to hear what I have to say today. But I appreciate your forbearance in this small act of liberty.

I’m a reporter so I won’t bury the lead. Your country needs you. The country that has given you so much is calling you, the Class of 2025. The country needs you, and it needs you today.

As a reporter, I have learned to respect opinions. Reasonable people can differ about the life of our country. America works well when we listen to those with whom we disagree and when we listen and when we have common ground and we compromise. And one thing we can all agree on – one thing at least – is that America is at her best when everyone is included.

To move forward, we debate, not demonize. We discuss, not destroy. But in this moment – this moment, this morning – our sacred rule of law is under attack. Journalism is under attack. Universities are under attack. Freedom of speech is under attack. An insidious fear is reaching through our schools, our businesses, our homes and into our private thoughts. The fear to speak. In America? If our government is – in Lincoln’s words – “of the people, by the people and for the people” – then why are we afraid to speak?

The Wake Forest Class of 1861 did not choose their time of calling. The Class of 1941 did not choose. The Class of 1968 did not choose. History chose them. And now history is calling you, the Class of 2025. You may not feel prepared, but you are. You are not descended of fearful people. You brought your values to school with you and now Wake Forest has trained you to seek the truth, to find the meaning of life. (continued on page 2)

Posted in Advocacy, Education, History, Law, Morality, Politics, Social justice | Comments Off on Scott Pelley speaks to 2025 graduates

The Unfolding Catastrophe Emanating From DC and Its Implications for Everyone’s Health – Tuesday at 2:30 PM in the MBR

Paul Pottinger, MD, DTMH, FACP, FIDSA, is a board certified physician and Director of the Infectious Diseases & Tropical Medicine Clinic at UW Medical Center – Montlake and a Professor in UW School of Medicine’s Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. He is also Co-Director of UWMC’s Antimicrobial Stewardship Program.

Posted in Government, Health | Comments Off on The Unfolding Catastrophe Emanating From DC and Its Implications for Everyone’s Health – Tuesday at 2:30 PM in the MBR

There’s never an end to Zucchini commentary

Thanks to Ed M (and to Gary Larson!)

Posted in Humor | Comments Off on There’s never an end to Zucchini commentary

May we remember

Posted in History, Holidays | Comments Off on May we remember

We Are Not Being Asked to Run Into Cannon Fire. We Just Need to Speak Up.

By Drew Gilpin Faust in the NYT

Ms. Faust is the author of “This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War” and a former president of Harvard University.

Frederick Douglass thought Decoration Day — the original name for Memorial Day — was the nation’s most significant holiday. On May 30, 1871, the day’s fourth annual observance, he honored the unknown Union dead at Arlington National Cemetery, addressing President Grant, members of his cabinet and a crowd of dignitaries surrounded by graves adorned with spring flowers. The Civil War’s losses were still raw, and the presence of the conflict’s victorious commander at the Arlington property that was once the home of Robert E. Lee, the recently deceased rebel general, could only have deepened the war’s shadow.

Yet Douglass worried that the lives and purposes of the approximately 400,000 Northern soldiers who died in the war and even the meaning of the war itself might be forgotten. If the nation did not keep the memory of the conflict alive, he implored, “I ask in the name of all things sacred, what shall men remember?” The Union dead must not be honored only for their bravery or their sacrifice, he insisted. It mattered what they died for. It mattered what the nation chose to remember.

“They died for their country. … They died for their country,” Douglass repeated. They had fought against the “hell-black system of human bondage” and for a nation that embodied “the hope of freedom and self-government throughout the world.” Americans must not forget that this was why the dead had laid down their lives in numbers no one had anticipated or could even have imagined.

Decoration Day honored those who had fought for the promise of America — the “new birth of freedom” that Lincoln envisioned in his Gettysburg Address, delivered to dedicate a soldiers’ cemetery while the conflict still raged. Eight years later, Douglass echoed the words of a president who had himself become a casualty of the war. Lincoln and hundreds of thousands of Union soldiers had died to defend and preserve what the president described in 1863 as a nation “conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” Douglass devoted the remainder of his life to ensuring those men did not die in vain. (continued)

Posted in Essays, History, Holidays | Comments Off on We Are Not Being Asked to Run Into Cannon Fire. We Just Need to Speak Up.

Kipling’s “When Earth’s Last Picture is Painted”

Ed note: I was talking to Mike C. at dinner about our early education and how, at times, we were required to memorize poetry. This is one poem he still recalls. We discussed the value of memorizing things in childhood, and revisiting them as adults. I think this is now lost to current generations as we can now quickly search with AI. What has been your experience with youthful memorization? Does the meaning and value of memorized passages affect us differently as we age?

When Earth’s last picture is painted and the tubes are twisted and dried,
When the oldest colours have faded, and the youngest critic has died,
We shall rest, and faith, we shall need it – lie down for an aeon or two,
Till the Master of All Good Workmen Shall put us to work anew.


And those that were good shall be happy: they shall sit in a golden chair;
They shall splash at a ten-league canvas with brushes of comet’s hair.
They shall find real saints to draw from – Magdalene, Peter, and Paul;
They shall work for an age at a sitting and never be tired at all!


And only the Master shall praise us, and only the Master shall blame;
And no one will work for the money, and no one will work for the fame,
But each for the joy of the working, and each, in his separate star,
Shall draw the Thing as he sees It for the God of Things as They are!

Posted in Poetry | Comments Off on Kipling’s “When Earth’s Last Picture is Painted”

When you have nothing else to do!

Thanks to Bob P.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on When you have nothing else to do!

I’m A Psychologist Who Specializes In Narcissists. Here’s What We Need To Do To Stop Trump.

By Jocelyn Sze in the Huffington Post (thanks to MaryLou P.)

The Trump administration is planning a June 14 military parade to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army — and the president’s 79th birthday. When your sense of self-exaltation requires tanks, flyovers and up to $45 million for a birthday party, we’re no longer in the realm of cake and candles — we’re squarely in Criterion 1 of narcissistic personality disorder: “a grandiose sense of self-importance.”

To be clear, I can’t diagnose the president or any public figure without personal examination. But research shows that those in positions of power, especially in politics, are more likely to exhibit traits of grandiose narcissism. When narcissistic control seeps into leadership, it distorts truth, erodes trust and destabilizes institutions. The more we understand these dynamics, the better we can protect both the public and the health of our democracy.

As a clinical psychologist who works with trauma and narcissistic abuse, I see echoes of this dynamic every day in my therapy office. The same patterns that destabilize families destabilize democracies: along with the magnetic vision of the grandiose narcissist come denial, attack, reversal of blame and emotional chaos.

I think of one of my patients when she discovered her brother was terrorizing their elderly mother with violent threats and financial abuse. When she named the harm, he flipped the script — denying everything and accusing her of being unstable, all while fiercely protecting his “golden boy” image. Under family pressure to stay quiet, she spiraled into rumination. But armed with awareness and support, she stood firm. Like a broken record, she calmly named the harm until her boundary held. It came at a cost, but her brother was eventually removed from their mother’s home.

This same pattern shows up, magnified, on the political stage. Narcissistic control in government thrives on flipping the script and silencing watchdogs.

Authoritarian leaders, like narcissistic family members, rely on well-worn tactics to manufacture a psychological state of volatile uncertainty — where outcomes aren’t just unknown, but constantly shifting and unpredictable. This overwhelms the brain’s ability to anticipate and prepare, keeping people mentally off-balance and easier to control. The good news: Awareness works like a vaccine, gradually building psychological immunity against further harm. (continued)

Posted in Government, Mental Health | Comments Off on I’m A Psychologist Who Specializes In Narcissists. Here’s What We Need To Do To Stop Trump.

Silencing the CDC

A recent study by the CDC showed how to prevent the most common cause of hospitalizations in babies. Why haven’t we heard about it?

Paul Offit (thanks to Ed. M)

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of hospitalizations among U.S. infants, with those 0-2 months of age at greatest risk. The virus causes intense inflammation in the small breathing tubes (bronchioles) inside the lungs. Every year in the U.S., RSV causes 58,000-80,000 hospitalizations and 100-300 deaths in children less than 5 years of age. Worldwide, RSV causes 3.6 million hospitalizations and 100,000 deaths every year in children. Because children less than 2 months of age are at greatest risk, strategies to prevent the disease are based on providing antibodies either through the placenta by maternal vaccination or directly to the baby with a long-acting monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab). The maternal RSV vaccine is given between 32 to 36 weeks’ gestation. The monoclonal antibody is recommended for all infants 0-7 months of age and infants 8-19 months of age at greatest risk.

Recently, researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a study examining the impact of these two strategies to prevent RSV. They compared the incidence of hospitalizations in children less than 5 years old in the 2024-2025 RSV season—when both the RSV maternal vaccine and monoclonal antibody were available—with hospitalizations in the 2018-2020 seasons, when neither were available. In one surveillance system, they found that hospitalizations decreased by 43%. The largest rate reduction, 52%, was found in children 0-2 months of age. Indeed, the availability of the vaccine and antibody likely caused the drop in the U.S. infant mortality rate this year. Currently, only 33% of pregnant women receive the RSV vaccine and 45% of babies receive nirsevimab. With wider use, hospitalizations will continue to decrease, and the infant mortality rate will likely continue to drop.

So why haven’t we heard about this? Why didn’t this story dominate the news when the results appeared in a medical journal? Normally, the CDC embargoes copies of these high-impact studies the day before publication along with a press kit that includes talking points and other details. Press outlets may then request interviews from the authors or submit questions, which are answered by the CDC. Never happened. The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who for two decades has been an anti-vaccine activist and science denialist, has now paused any communications from the CDC that aren’t public health emergencies. He has restricted CDC attendance at scientific conferences, eliminated presentations to large audiences, and limited updates on CDC websites. In other words, he has muzzled the CDC.

It isn’t surprising, then, that Kevin Griffis, the director of the CDC’s Office of Communications since 2022, quit at the end of March 2025. “Public health communications should be about empowering people with reliable, science-based information,” said Griffis. “Unfortunately, we can’t count on Kennedy’s HHS for that anymore.”

When RFK Jr. was running for president, he said that, if elected, he would “give infectious diseases a break for about eight years.” As Secretary of HHS, this has meant 1) largely ignoring a measles outbreak that has killed two young children, the first measles deaths in children in the United States since 2003; 2) ignoring a pertussis outbreak that has exceeded 9,000 cases and is spreading twice as fast as last year; and 3) ignoring the 216 children who have died this year from influenza, the most since the swine flu pandemic of 2009. Now we learn that not only is RFK Jr. largely ignoring children dying unnecessarily from vaccine-preventable diseases, he’s also prohibiting the CDC from educating the public, the press, and the medical community about a new, life-saving strategy to prevent a viral infection that was previously unpreventable.

RFK Jr. ushered in his administration with the phrase “radical transparency.” Whereas, the previous administration, according to him, hadn’t been honest with the American public, his administration would be. This transparency doesn’t apparently extend to information that counters his fixed, immutable, science-resistant belief that “no vaccines are safe and effective.” If RFK Jr. really wants to Make America Healthy Again, he should step down as head of HHS.

Posted in Advocacy, Education, Government, Health | Comments Off on Silencing the CDC

Joe Biden Has a Chance to Do Something Astounding

By Patti Davis in the NYT

Ms. Davis is the author of “Dear Mom and Dad: A Letter About Family, Memory and the America We Once Knew.” She led a long-running support group for caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s.

On Nov. 5, 1994, my father, Ronald Reagan, wrote a letter to America announcing he had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s. He and my mother had decided to share the news, he wrote, because, “In opening our hearts, we hope this might promote greater awareness of this condition. Perhaps it will encourage a clearer understanding of the individuals and families who are affected by it.”

Almost six years after leaving office, no longer the leader of the free world, my father found another path of leadership — sharing the sadness of a diagnosis that is heartbreakingly common, one that often leaves people feeling helpless, terrified and alone, even if they have family members and friends around them. Facing one’s own mortality is a solitary journey, yet seeing through the shadows to an outstretched hand, hearing in that wilderness that there is someone else wrestling with the same emotions, calls forth the tears that want to fall and also the possibility that those tears will dry.

Over the weekend, Joe Biden informed the nation of his diagnosis of prostate cancer. For the former president, it is, of course, a personal matter, but it can also be something else: an opportunity to show leadership, not in the arena of national or global politics, but on a vulnerable, human level.

Alzheimer’s was almost a forbidden subject when my father received his diagnosis. He opened the gates to discussing it, looking at it, trying to understand it. It was a role very different from the one he had known as governor or president.

The disease afflicting Mr. Biden is these days spoken of openly, but the emotional tidal waves that come with it are often not. Millions of people face the trauma and fear of learning that they have cancer. Millions of people struggle with how to talk about it, how to process it, how to get through the endless dark nights when death stands in the doorway and whispers “maybe.”

Mr. Biden’s news comes at a bad time for him politically, amid renewed discussion of the decline he suffered while in office, and of the ways his staff and family insulated him and kept the American people in the dark. That has fueled speculation that he knew about the cancer for far longer than he has divulged. (My father, too, was accused of knowing about his diagnosis while he was in office, years before he disclosed it. For that to have been true, he would have lived with the disease for 20 or so years — not a realistic possibility for someone his age.)

Coming at the end of Mr. Biden’s public service, these issues run the risk of overshadowing his accomplishments. But people’s life stories are complex. Mr. Biden has an opportunity now to add another chapter to his biography and to his legacy. He can do that by lowering his guard, by sharing with us not only what it says on his medical chart but also how it feels to hear it, by talking openly about what it feels like to contemplate the end that comes for us all.

He has no more elections to navigate, and no more focus-grouped calculations to make. After decades of being a politician, he can just be an all-too-mortal human being. And his candor now might go a long way toward restoring trust with voters — even his own supporters — who feel that he was not honest with them about his fitness for a second term.

To be sure, personal revelations are less surprising now than they were in my father’s day. We live in times of great oversharing. Mr. Biden’s openness would be something different, though. It would be a recognition that some experiences transcend partisan politics, ideological debates, bitter judgments. A recognition that as human beings, we are both fragile and strong. And we are more alike than we are different.

For my father, the announcement of his illness was also the announcement of the end of his public life. He still got out, went for walks, attended church, and along the way he encountered a great many people, but his days of making speeches and statements were over. Prostate cancer is very different from Alzheimer’s, however. For Mr. Biden, the announcement of his illness can also be the start of a new relationship with the American people. No doubt some will lean into his vulnerability as an opportunity for attack. I suspect a great many more people, no matter their political orientation, would simply be grateful for his openness.

At the end of my father’s letter, he wrote: “When the Lord calls me home, whenever that may be, I will leave with the greatest love for this country. …” Pushing past the political to the personal, showing us that leadership sometimes comes in small gestures, would be an expression of the love for this country that I believe Mr. Biden has always felt, and a way, perhaps, to soothe a few of the fears that so many of us wrestle with.

Posted in Advocacy, Dementia, end of life, Essays | Comments Off on Joe Biden Has a Chance to Do Something Astounding

Is There a Least Bad Alcohol?

We all know about the health risks of drinking. But if you’re going to partake, it’s natural to want to minimize the damage.

By Caroline Hopkins Legaspi in the NYT

Q: I’ve been trying to cut back on alcohol lately, but I do drink occasionally. Are any types of alcohol less risky than others?

If you’ve heard that red wine is better for you than beer or liquor, or that clear liquor like vodka or gin is less harmful than dark liquor like rum or whiskey, we have bad news.

“Alcohol is alcohol,” said Jürgen Rehm, a senior scientist at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto. Drinking any type of alcohol, in any amount, is bad for health.

Still, experts say, it’s sometimes not reasonable or even practical for people to avoid alcohol entirely. So if you’re going to drink, there are some strategies you can take to reduce your risk, and to avoid some of the other unpleasant effects of drinking, like hangovers.

When you have a drink, your body turns the ethanol that’s present in the alcoholic beverage into a “really nasty substance” called acetaldehyde, which can damage your DNA, said Timothy Stockwell, an alcohol researcher at the University of Victoria in Canada.

Many tissues in the body, including those in the mouth, throat, liver, colon and breasts, are susceptible to this harm. And when that DNA gets repaired, cancerous mutations may arise.

This is why drinking increases the risk for developing at least seven types of cancer, said Katherine Keyes, a professor of epidemiology at Columbia University. Excessive alcohol use — which includes having eight or more drinks per week for women or 15 or more per week for men; or four or more drinks per occasion for women or five or more for men — is also linked with many other health conditions. These include heart and liver disease, depression, anxiety and memory problems, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The more ethanol in your drink, the more harmful it is, Dr. Keyes said. One way to assess this is to look at a drink’s alcohol by volume, or A.B.V., which manufacturers must list on product labels. If you’re choosing between two beers of the same size, for instance, and one is 4 percent A.B.V. and the other is 8 percent, the 4 percent beer will expose you to half as much ethanol.

In general, beer has less ethanol than wine per ounce, and wine has less than liquors like vodka and tequila, Dr. Keyes said. But there can be large variations within these categories, Dr. Stockwell said. Some strong beers, for instance, have A.B.V.s that are higher than some wines (or even some liquors, on the extreme end).

A good rule for reducing your exposure to ethanol is to generally choose drinks with lower A.B.V.s, the experts said. But it’s important to pay attention to how much you’re drinking as well.

A standard 12-ounce pour of a 5 percent A.B.V. beer typically has the same amount of ethanol as five ounces of a 12 percent wine or 1.5 ounces (or a shot) of a 40 percent liquor.

It can be tricky to calculate the A.B.V. of cocktails, said Dr. Peng-Sheng (Brian) Ting, an assistant professor of clinical medicine at the Tulane University School of Medicine, since they are often made with sodas, juices and sometimes multiple types of alcohol. For this reason, he recommends sticking with wine or beer in situations where you want to know exactly how much ethanol you’re consuming.

Some types of alcohol are also quite high in calories, which when consumed in excess can increase the risk of weight gain and obesity. And some cocktail mixers, like juices and sodas, can contain added sugars, also raising the risk for obesity and other health conditions like Type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

Dr. Keyes also recommended against consuming alcoholic drinks that are mixed with caffeine (like espresso martinis or vodka Red Bulls). The energy boost you get from them may make you feel less inebriated than you really are, potentially prompting you to drink more and to become more drunk, Dr. Keyes said.

And while there’s no evidence that darker liquors are more harmful to health than clear ones, there is limited research suggesting that some darker liquors can cause more severe hangovers, said Damaris Rohsenow, a professor at the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies at Brown University. Darker alcohols (like bourbon, rum and brandy) tend to have higher levels of congeners, substances that are created during the fermentation process and contribute to a drink’s flavor, aroma and color. More congeners typically translates to worse hangovers, Dr. Rohsenow said.

There can be exceptions to the “clear is better” rule, however, Dr. Rohsenow added. Some tequilas, which can be clear or light-colored, for instance, can be high in congeners and may lead to worse hangovers.

Posted in Health | 1 Comment

Prostate Experts See Familiar Scenario in Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis

Ed note: The article below relates the common misunderstandings about the benefits of screening for prostate cancer. The great majority of prostate cancers that are common in old men behave in a benign fashion, so most of us die with prostate cancer but not from prostate cancer. The rule is first do no harm–in order to prevent impotence, incontinence and radiation damage. We need a better test than the often inconclusive PSA. We need to understand which cancers are dangerous and which aren’t. At present, unfortunately, we don’t have the answers.


By Gina Kolata in the NYT

Some Americans say they don’t understand how former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. could have only recently learned that he had an aggressive form of prostate cancer that had already spread to his bones. How could the former commander in chief, a man with access to high-quality medical care, not have known earlier that he had such a serious condition?

Many prostate cancers are detected using a test called a PSA, and Mr. Biden’s last known PSA was in 2014, according to a spokesman, Chris Meagher. Guidelines from professional organizations that advise doctors and public health officials recommend against screening for men over age 70. Mr. Biden is 82.

But many men, in consultation with their doctors, continue screening into their 70s, which is not unreasonable if the man is healthy and has a life expectancy of at least 10 years, said Dr. Scott Eggener, a prostate cancer specialist at the University of Chicago.

Prostate cancer experts also say, though, that even if Mr. Biden had been screened regularly, it’s entirely possible the cancer was not detected till recently. They said that some men suddenly find out they have advanced prostate cancer even after being screened regularly year after year and told they have a clean bill of health.

It is unusual, but it does happen.

“I have an entire collection of what I call rocket PSAs,” said Dr. Ian Thompson, a prostate cancer specialist at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio. These are men, he said, who are screened year after year with the PSA, a blood test that can pick up signs of prostate cancer. Year after year, their PSA is very low. Then, suddenly, it soars.

He also sees men with advanced prostate cancer who have normal results on their PSA screening tests. (continued)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Prostate Experts See Familiar Scenario in Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis

Remembering those words

Posted in Satire | Comments Off on Remembering those words

Medicaid cuts proposed for 8.6 million people. Impact will differ across states.

From The Epidemiologist

A recent study found that, since 2010, Medicaid expansion has reduced the mortality of the low-income adult population by 2.5%. In other words, Medicaid expansion saved more than 27,000 lives. Deaths fell not only among older enrollees (who are usually most sick) but also among those in their 20s and 30s, too. The study also found that Medicaid expansions were cost-effective.

Congress is debating a bill to cut Medicaid—even though 80% of Americans oppose such cuts. If passed, an estimated 8.6 million people could lose healthcare coverage by 2034 (out of the 71.2 million people with Medicaid). This would be the largest Medicaid cut in history. (Note: it has just passed through the House Budget Committee)

The impact of this bill will depend on where you live. KFF outlined a few key factors:

  • State budgets: Each state will respond differently to the loss of federal funds. For instance, states that expanded Medicaid to cover long-term care may see that as an area to cut first.
  • Population needs: States with higher rates of unemployment or poorer overall health will be hit harder.
  • Access to care: The more limited the healthcare infrastructure in a state, the more damaging the cuts could be.

States like West Virginia and Mississippi are likely among the hardest hit. Below is a breakdown of the most affected states, depending on what factors we take into account.

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation; Annotated by Your Local Epidemiologist

What does this mean for you? Time to reach out to your representatives. Here are some tips. Dr. Emily Smith has a great Medicaid explainer if you want more information.

Note that Medicaid programs go by different names in each state, making it tricky to track how federal changes might affect your health care. For example, “cutting Medicaid” is the same as “cutting PeachCare” in Georgia or “cutting Healthy Connections” in South Carolina. Hover over the graph below to see what Medicaid is called in your state.

Medicaid programs go by different names in different states.

Hover over your state to find the name of your Medicaid program

Posted in Government, Health | Comments Off on Medicaid cuts proposed for 8.6 million people. Impact will differ across states.

These stunning photos show how nature came back after the world’s largest dam removal project

by BY Adele Peters thanks to Pam P.

It’s been less than a year since the world’s largest dam removal project was completed along 420 miles of the Klamath River, near the border of Oregon and California. But if you look at the river now, you might not know that four dams had ever been in place. Instead of concrete walls and artificial reservoirs, the river is now free-flowing—and parts of the former infrastructure have been replaced by wildflowers that are in bloom.

Iron Gate Dam, circa 2023 [Photo: Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images]

“It’s been an incredible transition,” says Ann Willis, California regional director at American Rivers, a nonprofit that supported Native American tribes in a decades-long fight to take out the dams. “It’s really strange and wonderful to stand on the bridge that goes across the Klamath River and look upstream where Iron Gate Dam used to be. I used to imagine a river above it, and now I see the river.”

Construction crews remove the top of the cofferdam that was left of Iron Gate Dam, allowing the Klamath River to run in its original path for the first time in nearly a century near Hornbrook, California, in August 2024. [Photo: Carlos Avila Gonzalez/San Francisco Chronicle/Getty Images]

The dams were built between 1918 and 1962 to provide hydropower, and immediately blocked salmon from migrating. Over time, the ecosystem started to collapse. By 1997, coho salmon in the river were listed as endangered. (The river was once the third-largest salmon fishery in the continental U.S.) In 2002, when the federal government diverted water to farms instead of letting it flow downstream in the river, tens of thousands of salmon died. Local tribes like the Yurok—who have lived by the river for at least 10,000 years, and who consider salmon a central and sacred part of their culture—started the long fight to take out the dams. (continued)

Posted in energy, environment, Nature | Comments Off on These stunning photos show how nature came back after the world’s largest dam removal project

Maja Sereda: Back to the Wild

Ed note: You can find more about Maja — her art, teaching and wildlife advocacy at her website https://majasereda.biz/.

Maja Sereda is a multidisciplinary artist who immerses herself in the world of abstraction, fiber arts, and highly detailed drawings. Throughout her life, nature has unfailingly been her refuge, a steadfast source of solace, and an anchor for inner peace.

After studying graphic design at University of Pretoria and working as an art director in advertising agencies, both in South Africa and Ireland, Maja became an award-winning book illustrator. She has illustrated more than 20 books with many major publishers including Penguin Random House, Maskew Miller Longman, Oskar Editeur, Tafelberg & Lapa Publishers. Amongst others, she won the Crystal Kite award in 2011 and the Katrine Harries Award for best illustration for 2010. In 2012, she was also invited to illustrate a book with a French author, Yves Pinguilly titled La Grande Fleur (The Big Flower), followed by an invitation to Salon du Livre fair in Paris, France and La Reunion, where she showcased her books and led art workshops for children. 

With the outbreak of COVID, she began teaching drawing classes online. By investing deeply in her students’ work through highly individualized feedback, research and demonstrations, she nurtured an online community of over 250 artists. 

Now based in Seattle, with a deep passion for nature, Maja has founded Guardians of the Jungle, a creative project which aims to save endangered wildlife and protect precarious ecosystems.

Posted in Advocacy, Animals, Art | Comments Off on Maja Sereda: Back to the Wild

The Second Poem the Night-Walker Wrote

Thanks to Bob P.

Posted in Poetry | Comments Off on The Second Poem the Night-Walker Wrote

Bruce Springsteen’s opening comments

May 14, 2025 MANCHESTER (thanks to Pam P.)

Tonight, Bruce Springsteen and The E Street Band opened their Land of Hope & Dreams Tour in Manchester, England. Bruce launched this run of shows with three statements about the situation in the United States, with comments preceding his songs “Land of Hope and Dreams,” “House of a Thousand Guitars” and “My City of Ruins.”

Posted in Advocacy, Government, Music | Comments Off on Bruce Springsteen’s opening comments

Corruption, habeas corpus, emoluments and more

Heather Cox Richardson

The biggest news over the weekend was silence: the silence of Republicans. They refused to disavow White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller’s statement that the administration is looking at suspending the writ of habeas corpus, that is, essentially declaring martial law. They have also stayed quiet after the administration announced it was planning to accept a gift of a $400 million luxury Boeing 747-8 plane from the Qatari royal family. President Donald J. Trump would use the plane as Air Force One during the rest of his presidency and take it with him when he leaves office.

This is in keeping with the refusal of 53 Republican senators to answer questions from Rolling Stone’s Ryan Bort after NBC’s Kristen Welker asked Trump, “Don’t you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States, as president?” and he answered: “I don’t know.” Only Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) went on the record, posting on social media: ​​“Following the Constitution is not a suggestion. It is a guiding force for all of us who work on behalf of the American people. Do you agree?”

It seems as if Republicans who are not on board the MAGA train are hoping the courts or reality will stop Trump’s authoritarian overreach. As Steve Vladeck noted on Friday in One First, there is “near-universal consensus…that only Congress can suspend habeas corpus—and that unilateral suspensions by the President are per se unconstitutional.” In addition, Miller’s insistence that it would be appropriate to suspend the writ of habeas corpus because the United States is under attack—a position Trump echoed yesterday when he posted, “Our Country has been INVADED by 21,000,000 Illegal Aliens, many of whom are Murderers and Criminals of the Highest Order”—has failed repeatedly in court.

Reality will trip up Trump’s plan to take possession of the Qatari gift. As David Kurtz noted this morning in Talking Points Memo, retrofitting the luxury plane with the defense capabilities and security protections necessary for Air Force One will take years, not months. (Air Force One is not a specific airplane; it is the call sign given to any Air Force aircraft carrying the president of the United States).

Still, the Republicans’ silence matters. Whether Trump’s plans are all possible is not the point: he and the members of his administration are deliberately attacking the fundamental principles of our democratic republic. That lawmakers who swore an oath to uphold those principles are choosing to remain silent makes them complicit in that attack.

The framers of the U.S. Constitution recognized that democratic government was a new departure from a world in which the world’s monarchs made deals amongst themselves. They placed strong guardrails around the behavior of future chief executives to make sure they would not sell the American people out to foreign leaders. “[N]o Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State,” they wrote in the Constitution. An emolument is a payment. (continued on the website on page 2)

Posted in Government | 1 Comment

What Paris and Skyline will have in common!

Thanks to Deborah C.

Posted in Architecture | Comments Off on What Paris and Skyline will have in common!

Josh Hawley: Don’t Cut Medicaid

By Josh Hawley

In the NYT. Mr. Hawley is a Republican senator from Missouri.

Polls show Democrats down in the dumps at their lowest approval level in decades, but we Republicans are having an identity crisis of our own, and you can see it in the tug of war over President Trump’s “one big, beautiful bill.” The nub of the conflict: Will Republicans be a majority party of working people, or a permanent minority speaking only for the C suite?

Mr. Trump has promised working-class tax cuts and protection for working-class social insurance, such as Medicaid. But now a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing — is urging Congress to ignore all that and get back to the old-time religion: corporate giveaways, preferences for capital and deep cuts to social insurance.

This wing of the party wants Republicans to build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor. But that argument is both morally wrong and politically suicidal.

Let’s begin with the facts of the matter. Medicaid is a federal program that provides health care to low-income Americans in partnership with state governments. Today it serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.

As for Missouri, it is one of 40 Medicaid expansion states — because our voters wanted it that way. In 2020, the same year Mr. Trump carried the Missouri popular vote by a decisive margin, voters mandated that the state expand Medicaid coverage to working-class individuals unable to afford health care elsewhere. Voters went so far as to inscribe that expansion in our state constitution. Now some 21 percent of Missourians benefit from Medicaid or CHIP, the companion insurance program for lower-income children. And many of our rural hospitals and health providers depend on the funding from these programs to keep their doors open.

All of which means this: If Congress cuts funding for Medicaid benefits, Missouri workers and their children will lose their health care. And hospitals will close. It’s that simple. And that pattern will replicate in states across the country.

One of my constituents, a married mother of five, contacted me to explain why Medicaid is vital to her 8-year-old daughter, who depends on a feeding tube to survive. Formula, pump rentals, feeding extensions and other treatments cost $1,500 a month; prescriptions nearly double that cost. These expenses aren’t covered by private insurance. The mother wrote to me, “Without Medicaid, we would lose everything — our home, our vehicles, and eventually, our daughter.”

Congress should be doing everything possible to aid these working families, to make their health care better and more affordable. We should cap prescription drug costs, as I have recently proposed. We should give every family in America with children a hefty tax cut. What we should not do is eliminate their health care.

Mr. Trump himself has been crystal clear on this point. Since taking office he has repeatedly rejected calls for Medicaid benefit cuts. Just the other week, he said, “We are doing absolutely nothing to hurt Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security. Nothing at all.”

And for good reason. The president understands who his voters are. Recent polling shows that 64 percent of Republicans hold a favorable view of Medicaid. About one in six have personally been on the program. Meanwhile, more than 80 percent of Americans oppose significant cuts to Medicaid and over half — half — have a personal or family connection to the Medicaid program.

It’s safe to say the Trump coalition was not pulling the lever for Medicaid cuts in November. Mike Johnson, the House speaker, finally woke up to this fact last week, when he withdrew his support from one of the most aggressive reductions to Medicaid on the table. But many of my House and Senate colleagues keep pushing for substantial cuts, and the House will begin to hash out its differences in negotiations this week.

My colleagues have cited the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal, which has been pushing that line for months, including in a recent editorial that inveighed against my opposition to Medicaid benefit cuts. But following The Journal’s prescriptions would represent the end of any chance of us becoming a working-class party.

Republicans need to open their eyes: Our voters support social insurance programs. More than that, our voters depend on those programs. And there’s a reason for this that Republicans would do well to ponder. Our economy is increasingly unfriendly to working people and their families.

For the better part of 50 years, working wages have been flat in real terms. Working people cannot afford to get married when they want to, have the number of children they want to or raise those children as they would like. These days, they can barely afford to put a roof over their kids’ heads, to say nothing of health care.

Both Democrats and Republicans share the blame for this state of affairs, which is one big reason Mr. Trump got elected. He promised to shake up the status quo. Republicans in Congress should pay attention. Our voters not only want us to protect the social insurance they need to get by; they also want us to fight for a better life — for a better economy with the kinds of jobs and wages that allow working people to get married and start families, to buy homes and have a stake in their towns and neighborhoods.

That’s the promise of American life. If Republicans want to be a working-class party — if we want to be a majority party — we must ignore calls to cut Medicaid and start delivering on America’s promise for America’s working people.

Josh Hawley is a Republican senator from Missouri.

Posted in Government, Health, Insurance | 1 Comment

Design lab invents first-of-its-kind 3D-printed wheelchair for kids — and will give them away for free

from Good Good Good – thanks to Pam P.

The average pediatric wheelchair can cost thousands of dollars. And when children grow and their needs evolve — or a wheelchair gets damaged — those costs multiply.

So, the team at MakeGood NOLA, a New Orleans-based adaptive design lab, has made something that can transform the world for disabled children.

“Introducing the world’s first fully 3D-printed wheelchair,” MakeGood founder and president Noam Platt started a recent social media video.

A green 3D-printed wheelchair for toddlers
The new 3D-printed chair by MakeGood. Photo courtesy of MakeGood NOLA

He wheels a small, almost toy-like lime-green wheelchair into the frame, complete with a matching harness, suitable for children ages 2 to 8.

“Everything from the body, to the wheels, to the tires, the seat, and even the straps, all were 3D printed on a regular Bambu Labs A1 machine,” Platt continued.

This means the design is fully compatible with a regular 3D printer anyone can have in their home.

“We designed this to be modular and easy to make,” Platt continued. “Really, anyone with a 3D printer and some filament can download the files and print it.”

Posted in Health, Kindness | Comments Off on Design lab invents first-of-its-kind 3D-printed wheelchair for kids — and will give them away for free

Finding your mother!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Finding your mother!