Retreating from Afghanistan – a lesson from 1842

The British troops in the city were greatly outnumbered and unable to defend themselves properly, as the cantonment was encircled.

A truce was arranged in late November, and it seems the Afghans simply wanted the British to leave the country. But tensions escalated when the son of Dost Mohammed, Muhammad Akbar Khan, appeared in Kabul and took a harder line.

British Forced to Flee

Sir William McNaghten, who had been trying to negotiate a way out of the city, was murdered on December 23, 1841, reportedly by Muhammad Akbar Khan himself. The British, their situation hopeless, somehow managed to negotiate a treaty to leave Afghanistan.

On January 6, 1842, the British began their withdrawal from Kabul. About 4,500 British troops and 12,000 civilians who had followed the British Army to Kabul left the city. The plan was to march to Jalalabad, about 90 miles away.

The retreat in the brutally cold weather took an immediate toll, and many died from exposure in the first days. And despite the treaty, the British column came under attack when it reached a mountain pass, the Khurd Kabul. The retreat became a massacre.

Slaughter in the Mountain Passes

A magazine based in Boston, the North American Review, published a remarkably extensive and timely account titled “The English in Afghanistan” six months later, in July 1842. It contained this vivid description:

“On the 6th of January, 1842, the Caboul forces commenced their retreat through the dismal pass, destined to be their grave. On the third day they were attacked by the mountaineers from all points, and a fearful slaughter ensued…

“The troops kept on, and awful scenes ensued. Without food, mangled and cut to pieces, each one caring only for himself, all subordination had fled; and the soldiers of the forty-fourth English regiment are reported to have knocked down their officers with the butts of their muskets.

“On the 13th of January, just seven days after the retreat commenced, one man, bloody and torn, mounted on a miserable pony, and pursued by horsemen, was seen riding furiously across the plains to Jellalabad. That was Dr. Brydon, the sole person to tell the tale of the passage of Khourd Caboul.”

More than 16,000 people had set out on the retreat from Kabul, and in the end, only one man, Dr. William Brydon, a British Army surgeon, had made it alive to Jalalabad. 

The garrison there lit signal fires and sounded bugles to guide other British survivors to safety. But after several days they realized that Brydon would be the only one.

The legend of the sole survivor endured. In the 1870s, a British painter, Elizabeth Thompson, Lady Butler, produced a dramatic painting of a soldier on a dying horse said to be based on the story of Brydon. The painting, titled “Remnants of an Army,” is in the collection of the Tate Gallery in London. 

A Severe Blow to British Pride

The loss of so many troops to mountain tribesmen was, of course, a bitter humiliation for the British. With Kabul lost, a campaign was mounted to evacuate the rest of the British troops from garrisons in Afghanistan, and the British then withdrew from the country entirely.

And while popular legend held that Dr. Brydon was the only survivor from the horrific retreat from Kabul, some British troops and their wives had been taken hostage by Afghans and were later rescued and released. A few other survivors turned up over the years as well.

One account, in a history of Afghanistan by former British diplomat Sir Martin Ewans, contends that in the 1920s two elderly women in Kabul were introduced to British diplomats. Astoundingly, they had been on the retreat as babies. Their British parents had apparently been killed, but they had been rescued and brought up by Afghan families.

Despite the 1842 disaster, the British did not abandon the hope of controlling Afghanistan. The Second Anglo-Afghan War of 1878-1880 secured a diplomatic solution that kept Russian influence out of Afghanistan for the remainder of the 19th century.

This entry was posted in History, Politics, War. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Retreating from Afghanistan – a lesson from 1842

  1. Frank Conlon says:

    Some years ago, shortly after 9/11, the conservative talk radio host and sometime state politician John Carlson had me on his program on KJR to discuss whether the US should go into Afghanistan. I said that, based on the history of such earlier entities as the Mongols, Persians, Uzbeks, British (from India) and Russians, it would be a very unwise decision to get involved in a war within Afghanistan. Carlson’s listeners–who were not accustomed to the idea that the US could not win a war anywhere, were outraged and they had so many calls, that what was to have been a 30 minute slot lasted for an hour and a half. Some commented on my “communist leanings” and one man suggested I go back where I came from–to which I explained that that would be Omaha. Alas, as we see the dreadful situation evolving in Afghanistan today, I have to confess I am afraid that my opinion twenty years ago did merit more consideration than it received.

Comments are closed.