College Football is in Full Conflagration: We Need a New National Model

Part of the reason is a matter of geography that is immutable. Largely in the Pacific time zone on Saturdays, many games were telecast when fans in the rest of the country were already passed out drunk. Even those Pac-12 games in national prime time typically draw smaller local TV ratings because college ball comes in second or worse in the league’s big cities awash in pro sports: Bay Area, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Seattle and Denver.

The marketing slogan of the all-powerful Southeastern Conference, rich in college towns, addresses the contrast slyly and succinctly: “It just means more.” Even though the networks try to claim the much-lamented Pac-12 late kickoffs are in a valuable TV time slot, that’s crap. In the digital ad world, they’re called remnants, an inventory of ads sold at a discounted rate because of smaller audiences.

A bigger reason for the demise was self-inflicted: The Pac-12 Networks. In 2011, then-new commissioner Larry Scott introduced an innovative platform bought by the schools: A wholly owned, 24-hour cable channel that would distribute all football and men’s basketball games not taken by the networks, plus all the non-revenue (Olympic) sports that rarely get TV time. The problem was that the biggest distributor in the West, DirecTV, refused to agree to Scott’s pricing, because it didn’t believe there was an audience beyond family/friends for the other sports. As a result, Pac-12 Networks were invisible to large swathes of the conference footprint.

The epic misjudgment was compounded by the naive belief of presidents and chancellors that their own network would serve as a contemporary, yippee-skippee postcard for all member schools, and underscore to the colleges’ liberal sensibilities of inclusion and equality by giving time to sports beyond football and basketball. The noble aspirations came without traction. DirecTV was correct.

As a result, Pac-12 per-school annual revenues among the Power 5 conferences fell behind the SEC, Big Ten and the Atlantic Coast Conference, and barely ahead of the Big 12. Facing an entertainment industry in financial distress, George Kliavkoff, Scott’s successor, came in late and low with an exclusive proposal from Apple TV that was all streaming with no linear TV. The early-year revenues were well below the previous media-rights deal from ESPN and Fox. Oregon said no first. Washington said no second. The Pac-12 was dissolving: Every school for itself.

Arizona, Arizona State and Utah followed Colorado to the Big 12, leaving Washington State, Oregon State, Cal and Stanford adrift; a sudden, ignominious end years in the making.

Pat Chun, WSU’s athletics director, was predictably, publicly aggrieved.

“There’s a century of history that has gone by the wayside because this conference has mismanaged itself on a bunch of different levels,” he told the Spokesman Review. “And when you have poor leadership, one of the outcomes is failure. That’s what has happened to the Pac-12.”

College football is now in the awkward early stage of a years-long transition. Even if the Pac-12 had somehow stayed afloat, the increasingly harsh truth is, independent of conference affiliations, the haves in the sport are way ahead of the have-nots.

USA Today annually compiles revenue and expense data among 232 NCAA schools. In a June story about 2022 numbers among the public schools surveyed, Ohio State led with $252 million in revenues. Oregon’s $153 million was 19th. Washington was 25th at $145 million, behind seven Big Ten schools. WSU was 53rd at $85 million, just ahead of Oregon State at $83 million.

For the Cougars and Beavers to stay as competitive in football as they have been is remarkable. Money isn’t everything. But when it comes to the industry’s business future, it is the only thing.

For the 120-plus schools in the current top-tier Bowl Championship Series, the argument needs to be made for a British soccer-style system of tiers. The best big-budget schools play their like, then after the season, the worst several among them get relegated to a second tier. They are replaced in next season’s first tier by the best several from the second tier. 

Three tiers of 40? Six tiers of 20? Those are the details to be negotiated with the TV overlords. The urgent need is for radical realignment into a national — not regional — system. National reform is exactly what the conferences are seeking from Congress in their pursuit of federal laws regulating the private money of name/image/likeness that is anonymously disrupting the industry.

If national rules are required for NIL, why not create a national sports league? The beauty of a system of relegation is that it automatically creates dramatic tension for ordinary games, which makes good sports TV and increases attention and revenues. Regarding the loss of geographic rivalries, the current realignment suggests that’s no longer a priority. There will be leagues with teams in all four lower-48 time zones.

In the ruthless world of sports entertainment, the Pac-12 leadership smugly believed itself above the fray, some sort of a special outfit not subject to the smarminess of the business of big-time college ball. If I had to pick a small but representative moment of too-late awareness, it was the time in the 2021 season when soon-to-be-fired UW football coach Jimmy Lake downplayed any recruiting rivalry with Oregon by saying, “We battle more academically prowess (sic) teams.” He followed that on game day by furiously chasing down his own player on the sidelines and swatting him on the helmet on national TV, then lying about it.

Those who care about college football need to get their collective swerve on and demand swift demolition and rapid national reformation. No one wants to see Lake appointed new commissioner of the Pac-4.

This entry was posted in Business, Sports. Bookmark the permalink.