From Rifleman to Concertmaster, Stuart Canin Looks Back 90 Years

Thanks to Bob Petersonn

By Cristina Schreil

Stuart Canin whips open the door to his Berkeley home and shakes my hand with the kind of solid clasp you’d expect from any lifelong violinist. While many in the Bay Area music scene know him as the celebrated former concertmaster of the San Francisco Symphony and first music director of the New Century Chamber Orchestra, history buffs may recognize him from his role in a unique performance right after World War II. 

Canin, a Far Rockaway, Queens, New York native, was an army rifleman who thought to bring to war a cigar-box violin to “keep it in the fingers” while away from his famed teacher Ivan Galamian. Months later, he found himself on a balcony porch off a private home in Potsdam, Germany, with pianist Eugene List.

The mysterious task: Perform for President Truman. The date: July 17, 1945—what would later be known as day one of the Potsdam Conference.

I pick up a Brahms sonata now that I’ve played all my life and for some strange reason, I get a whole different look at it. You get, I think, closer to the composer’s intention as you mature. So, that’s how life goes. If you stay with it.

“Suddenly we heard automobile motors coming around the block and a bunch of limousines showed up and out of one stepped Joseph Stalin in his Marshall’s uniform,” Canin says, chuckling. “And Winston Churchill stepped out of the other. And Molotov, and Secretary of State Byrnes. Everybody who was ever on the front page of the New York Times came out of those cars and started into the house, and we said, ‘What’s this?’”

Hours later, the three titans—Truman, Churchill, and Stalin—sat on a small couch before the musicians. “And then Truman said, ‘Gentlemen, would you play something for us?’” Canin smiles as he recalls, “You could imagine, I was all of 19.”

Seventy-one years after the Potsdam concert, Canin was gearing up last November for a sold-out January Lincoln Center concert reenacting that exact program, to take place after the premiere of a documentary charting his role in the performance.

But Canin’s involvement in culturally significant moments hardly ended—or even began—with Potsdam. Canin, who, at the time of our interview looks forward to his 90th birthday in April, is warm and grounded as he glances back at his remarkable musical life.

Photo by Cristina Schreil

So, you picked up the violin at age five, correct? 

My father actually picked it up. I didn’t know anything about the violin. [Laughs.] And he brought it home one holiday season and said, “Let’s try.” My father was absolutely nuts about the violin.

Did you take to it immediately? 

At age seven, I remember playing a Vivaldi concerto with a little orchestra. My first teacher lived on 84th Street in Hammels near Rockaway Beach, so I used to go up there for lessons. He had a little orchestra and I played the Vivaldi A minor violin concerto at age seven for people—that’s pretty good. So, my father goes, “Hmm, maybe this has got a future.” 

And how did that lead to you playing on the Fred Allen Radio Show at age ten?

The Fred Allen Show took out a little notice in the newspaper and said they were paying $75 for an appearance. And, since my father was making $25 a week [laughs], he said, “Well, let’s try for this!” So I went into New York and I played for a gentleman who was Fred’s assistant. His name was “Uncle” Jim Harkins. He was very well-known in the radio trade. I played a piece called Praeludium and Allegro by Fritz Kreisler and it took about five minutes. And when I finished he said, “You know, we’d love to have you on but our sponsor will not see us allowing a ten-year-old (which I was at that time) to have five minutes of national radio time playing this.” They watched the pennies like that. He said, “Do you have something shorter?” 

I said, “I think I do.” So, I went home—I was practicing a piece called François Schubert’s The Bee—and I practiced until I got it down to about 45 seconds and I went back and I played it and Jim said, “Perfect.” And so on December 30, 1936, I performed on the Fred show. I got a very big hand on that round and Fred Allen said some nice things and then he said something to the effect that, “This ten-year-old boy can play The Bee so well and that 39-year-old comedian [Jack Benny] sounds like a she-wildcat defending her young when he plays.”

You have to have an intense love. That’s number one. If you just don’t care that much, you have to really go through heaven and hell to become part of that profession. And also, you have to practice. What else can I say?

You jumpstarted the rivalry.

The Benny-Allen feud, which became legendary! 

As a kid, already at that point were you saying, ‘I would like to make a career doing this?’

No, no, no, no, no. I was practicing. My father was very level-headed . . . . At one point the NBC network called my dad and asked if he would like me to have a 15-minute radio show every week. My father said, “No, no, I want him to grow up as a normal kid.” It was really quite interesting. 

When you turned 18, it was 1944. The war was starting to turn to the Allies’ favor. 

And in October ’44 I received, what we used to say, “a letter from Franklin Roosevelt.”

And then everything changed?

I was drafted into the army and the only thing they found for me to do was become a rifleman. I was sent to Camp Blanding, which is in Florida, and trained there. This was November and suddenly in December the Battle of the Bulge happened, which shorted my training weeks from 17 to 13. In 13 weeks I became a full-fledged rifleman, capable of defending the United States. I was sent back home to take a vacation for a week before we went back into the army and then I was kind of worried about what would happen to my violin playing because nobody knows how long you’re going to be in the army. It depends on how the war is progressing. So I was sent overseas at the end of February, I believe, and I decided to take a violin—you know, just the cheapest fiddle I could find. What I will never forget, I walked up the gangplank of a troopship in New York harbor and I carried my barracks bag on one shoulder, my rifle on the other—you know you carry all this stuff with you—and my violin case, and when I walked up the gangplank my commanding officer says, “What are you gonna do with that?” pointing at the violin. And I said, “Well, you never know!” But really I just didn’t want to lose it. If I ever had any opportunity, [I wanted] to take it out and play. Just to keep it in the fingers. So on the troopship going across I played, I practiced. And in fact, I have confirmation of that because just a few years ago, maybe 15 years ago, I met someone who was on the same troopship. He said, “You know, I used to hear you playing.” Isn’t that funny? Somewhere in the hold! 

Once in Europe, how did music still play a role in your life? 

The war ended on May 8 and I was in Kassel, Germany. On May 10 I got orders giving me my next assignment. 

And it turned out to be Paris. I said, “Wow that is something. Maybe I’ll be able to do something with my violin.” So they sent me back to Paris and the army was starting a soldier-show company. And I still remember these numbers: 6817th Soldier Show Company. They were collecting G.I.s who were all entertainers.

Did you collaborate with any other musicians there?

A pianist by the name of Eugene List, who was a very well-known American pianist. He was a wonderful pianist and my commanding officer said, “You know there are so many wounded soldiers in hospitals around Paris, it would be nice if you two guys got together and put together a program to play for the troops.” 

How did you choose your program?

First of all, the pieces needed to be short enough, because these guys were in bad shape. They had to have one idea—either very lively and jokey pieces or sweet songs that they could kind of relate to.

Playing together led to your being chosen to perform for Truman in Potsdam. How did that unfold?

One day our CO, commanding officer, came to us and said, “You know we just had word that Truman was coming over.” Mickey Rooney, Gene List, and myself, they flew us to Berlin because he was coming to Berlin—again nobody knew why—and we landed there and they drove us to Potsdam. They had a tent all set up for us. 

So if you can imagine living in a tent with Mickey Rooney for a week! [Laughs.] So one day, we’re in the tent and my CO comes across and says, “You and Eugene get your shoes shined and your pants pressed and take a shave.”

Later, when Truman, Churchill, and Stalin were sitting there, how did it go?

I had put my violin behind the piano to just get it out of harm’s way and when I went behind the piano to get my fiddle, a Russian aide to Stalin, who was standing behind him, leaped across the room to see what I was taking out! 

Out of this big, black case?

Exactly. So when I took the fiddle out he started to laugh and he went back.

What was the program?

One was the Praeludium and Allegro, which is the piece I played for the Fred Allen Showbut  was too long.

You redeemed it.

I redeemed it! Yes, I always say this piece is what started the Potsdam Conference.

What else did you play?

I played the slow movement of the Wieniawski D minor violin concerto, which is a lovely tune, and then another Kreisler piece, Tambourin Chinois, which is a short, sappy kind of piece with a Chinese overtone, and then played another famous piece of Kreisler’s, Liebesleid, and then finished with a piece called La Vida Breve, by Manuel de Falla. We felt that each piece had a little different color. 

Were you nervous?

When I was getting my violin out I was terribly nervous because of my audience. Where else do you get three people like that as your sole audience? We went back three nights in a row to play for Truman and his aides.

You helped break up the tension before this big conference. 

That’s what people think, that Truman thought that would be a good way to get started. One of my letters [home to my parents] said Truman’s aides said that [in concerts on the following evenings] he became suddenly more upbeat and seemed to be cheerful—and of course he had just gotten news that they had successfully exploded the atom bomb. 

After the war, how did you start to build a career?

I got in touch with my teacher Ivan Galamian, he was a very well-known teacher at Juilliard, and I went to Juilliard for the next three years. The war broke us up for about two years. And of course, I had to get back in shape. I had started with him at age 12, so I had been with him for about six years before I went into the army. 

So, I went back to Juilliard. You’re always wondering what to do with your life, when you’re a violinist, so I decided . . . to opt for a teaching position.

Well first, I got married—that was very important. My wife and I decided I did not want to hang around New York and just play on radio programs or commercials or whatever. So I took a position at the University of Iowa as a professor of violin and was first violinist of its Iowa String Quartet, and moved out of New York. I was there for three or four years at Iowa teaching, performing, playing concerts. You know, learning my trade.

And, we loved it.

What was interesting to you about chamber music?

I’ve always liked smaller groups—although that changed over the years—and one of the reasons is when you’re growing up and starting to play with other people, first you get to play with smaller groups. You play trios, string quartets, quintets. And that somehow was my grounding in music. 

First of all, the music is extraordinarily beautiful. And fascinating, interesting, and just struck a chord (if I may say that) in me. I used to do a lot of chamber music when I was in New York, wondering what to do, at Juilliard.

When did you opt for less teaching and more playing?

In 1959, I saw that there was a competition called the Paganini International Violin Competition. So I thought I would try that out. I saw the repertoire and it looked good to me so I went and I won.

You earned a special status in addition to winning, right?

Yeah, I was the first American to win the Paganini Competition Prize. So anyway I did some big concertizing at that time based on the follow through of the big competition and then, you know, unless you are determined to be a traveling concert artist—Isaac Stern, Itzhak Perlman, that kind of thing—it never worked out that way. I’m not sure that I was ever cut out for that sort of thing.

A couple years later, you got an invitation to teach at Oberlin.

I taught there for five years. And I realized I wanted to get back to playing. There was a small orchestra being started by a well-known violinist called the Chamber Symphony of Philadelphia. So I was with this group for two years. 

I was concertmaster, violin soloist with them, and we made a lot of records for RCA because they liked the idea of the small group that didn’t cost so much. But then I found out that there was an opening in San Francisco for concertmaster. I tried for it. I played for Seiji Ozawa, who was the conductor at that time, a Japanese phenomenon, and he offered me the position.

What was it like to be part of a symphony all of a sudden?

I had gotten a little bit of a desire when I was with this chamber symphony in Philadelphia. [In San Francisco], we were playing big repertoire; we were recording for RCA Victor, and so I began to see the professional musician’s life. Different from playing in a little string quartet with your friends. People paid money and came to hear us. We had big national tours. And then [I had] the idea: Maybe I should move on. I was always compelled to move on. You don’t want to get too comfortable in one spot. 

You went on to work as a freelance musician in movie-soundtrack studios in Los Angeles for 12 years. At one point you were concertmaster for John Williams, and you played for the Jurassic Park and Forrest Gump soundtracks, right?

It was a lot of fun. It was much more lucrative. First of all, it was a for-profit organization and I had two kids in medical school at that time. [Laughs.] So, a lot of bucks I needed. And as concertmaster you have a special position in the orchestra. You’re always invited into the recording booth to listen to the playback. 

You can hear the string area, see whether it’s sounding right. You’re a much bigger part here than in the symphonic world. So, we went to Los Angeles, in the studios, and then we came back and I was asked to start this New Century Chamber Orchestra, here, which is still going 20 years later.

So, I did that for seven years and then Kent Nagano, the conductor, was given the position of music director of the Los Angeles Opera and he and I knew each other very well. I had helped him out at the Berkeley Symphony a number of times, by playing concertmaster for him, and he said, how would you like to come back to Los Angeles? I went down for a year and I stayed ten.

You also worked with Paula Abdul.

On “Rush, Rush,” one of her big hits. I played the violin solo.

How would you say your diverse experiences over the years have molded you into the player you are today?

Well, without question, the varied forms of classical music that I’ve participated in, you know, unless you’re a complete dunderhead, you get ideas from everyone you’ve played with. Good, even bad people, you get ideas of “Don’t do that!” 

So when I got into the symphony field, to meet great conductors all the time who have their own ideas, to get to know Nagano and [James] Conlon more intimately. Every little thing helps, you know? To this day I still listen to performances. You don’t copy, but you get ideas, if you understand what I’m saying. So, you always kind of stay fresh with music now. I pick up a Brahms sonata now that I’ve played all my life and for some strange reason, I get a whole different look at it. You get, I think, closer to the composer’s intention as you mature. So, that’s how life goes. If you stay with it.

Do you still play every day?

Oh yeah, I do. I play an hour and a half every day. I just gave a concert at Old First Church [on Sacramento Street in San Francisco] a couple of weeks ago and I have this documentary thing at Lincoln Center, so I have to play.

You mentioned being nervous before the Potsdam Conference concert. Have nerves ever been an issue for you otherwise?

I was nervous when I saw them. But, once I started to play, my focus was on playing the music and not on who I was playing for. So, that left me. To this day I’ve been pretty good about focusing on what I’m doing, rather than who I’m playing for.  

Is that general advice you’d offer any player?

Well yeah, but you never know what the mind is going to do. Focus and also become sure enough of what you’re doing. I say people who know what they’re doing generally are not nervous. It’s people who have little weaknesses or little soft spots in their technique—that makes you nervous. 

Looking back over your career, what do you see as the key moments, or the big risks that you’re happy you took?

Just starting to play the violin! [Laughs.] That was the biggie. In everything, that was the big stream, or the big river, and all the tributaries flowed from that.

Well, there are important things. Marrying my wife, who loves music more than I do, has been very helpful.

And then, winning the Paganini Competition was the thing. And, of course the Potsdam Conference. The whole thing is to try to distinguish yourself among the thousands of people playing the violin, and you can only do that by getting some sort of name in a good way.

Do you have a favorite piece or a favorite concert that you gave?

You know something, it’s like the old song: When I’m not near the girl I love, I love the girl I’m near.

Whatever music I’m playing. I have no favorite composers; you cannot play one composer forever. I’m also open to doing new music.

What advice would you give musicians with an up-and-coming career?

There’s always some forward thinking that you can do. First of all, you have to have an intense love. That’s number one. If you just don’t care that much, you have to really go through heaven and hell to become part of that profession. 

And also, you have to practice. What else can I say?

I mean, I’m still, to this day, at 89, I’m still practicing, because there’s always something to learn. I would say you have to have the love for it. I mean, I’m not just talking about a fondness; I’m talking about a real desire or love.

Would you say playing over the years has kind of kept you young?

You don’t know why, but it keeps you alive. I mean, alive in the sense that your senses are alive—not just that you’re alive and walking . . . . Definitely it keeps you going and it’s just a great, great profession—if you can make your way in it. That’s the hard thing. 

Do you think if your father had not handed you that violin—

I never would have played it. 

Really?

Well, why would I have?

You don’t think you would be walking down the street and see a violin store and—

No. Well . . . I will never know. 

Your 90th birthday is in April. Any big plans?

No, no. I’m telling my wife, I’m interested in 91. I don’t want anything big. That’s a finish. I don’t want a finish.

Posted in History, Music | 1 Comment

The Four Living Presidents

Thanks to Mary Jane “MJ” Francis

Posted in Government, Politics, Voting | Leave a comment

Not coming Soon Anymore

Thanks to Janet Miller

No need to wait any longer for the Italian restaurant “Coming Soon” at the Museum House apartment building across from the Frye. That sign is gone!

Posted in Dinning, Neighborhood | Leave a comment

This grandma fought for a bill to allow happy hour at retirement homes

Thanks to Gene Carlson

Anita LeBrun said she hoped to enjoy a drink with her friends, but it was also a matter of independence.

Anita LeBrun spoke at a bill signing ceremony at Amira Choice in Champlin, Minnesota, on July 14. (Office of Governor Tim Walz)

By Kyle Melnick (of Washington Post)

Anita LeBrun wanted to drink a glass of pinot grigio with her friends at their retirement home. 

She was a regular at the facility’s semiweekly happy hours, but she thought it was ridiculous that they were dry. Minnesota law prohibited retirement homes from serving alcohol without an additional license.

“Everybody enjoyed it so much,” LeBrun, 82, said about the happy hours. “I just wanted it to happen that we could have, you know, a couple drinks.”

So LeBrun became the face of a movement to change the law.

LeBrun’s advocacy led her to testify before state lawmakers, gain national fame and stand beside Gov. Tim Walz (D) as he signed the bill, which became known among lawmakers as the “Grandparents’ Happy Hour” bill.

During 59 years of marriage, LeBrun and her late husband, Richard, often enjoyed happy hours at Minnesota bars and restaurants. LeBrun ordered white wine; Richard drank a beer or a vodka tonic.

LeBrun and Richard moved to Amira Choice, a senior home in Champlin, Minnesota, in June 2024. Five months later, Richard, 81, died of stomach cancer.

Amid her grief, LeBrun found a community at Amira Choice, which has about 125 residents. Friends knocked on her door to invite her to bingo, a gardening club and tea time. Tuesday and Friday afternoons were for happy hour, where facility employees served wine and beer, not knowing there was a law banning it. Residents were each limited to two drinks.

In April 2025, Amira Choice planned to celebrate its remodeling with an event that included sparkling wine. City officials, however, stepped in and said state law prohibited retirement homes from serving alcohol without a license. Residents were allowed to drink on their own, but they couldn’t be served alcohol at the facility. 

At happy hours, LeBrun, who has five grandchildren, began drinking 7Up. Then she joined facility leaders in meeting with lawmakers to discuss changing the law.

In March, state Sen. John Hoffman (D) and state Rep. Danny Nadeau (R) filed bills that would allow nursing homes and assisted-living facilities to serve alcohol. Soon came the part of the process that was the most nerve-racking for LeBrun: testifying before lawmakers.

LeBrun, who was a day care provider for more than three decades, said she’s shy and used to lean on her husband to lead conversations. But her daughters, Tonya and Kristen, encouraged LeBrun to believe in herself — the same advice LeBrun gave them when they were nervous about sports tryouts and tests when they were growing up. She practiced her speech to lawmakers in front of a mirror.

While waiting to testify before a Senate committee at the State Capitol in St. Paul in March, LeBrun saw a camera nearby, she said, but Abby Dahl, the executive director at Amira Choice, reassured her that most people would likely be watching more consequential hearings.

Dahl testified that her facility already followed the state’s health requirements for food and drinks. Adding a liquor permit would cost the facility between $1,000 and $6,700 annually, depending on the type of license they requested, according to the City of Champlin.

“Requiring a liquor license is simply red tape without value,” Dahl testified. “It is duplicative, not protective.”

Then LeBrun introduced herself, saying she was testifying “on behalf of the entire community of residents.”

“My friends and I love happy hour, just like many of you do, I am sure,” LeBrun said. “Over a shared drink, we get to reminisce about parts of our life, military service, raising a family, the loss of a friend and celebrating the golden phase of our lives.”

In the following days, LeBrun was shocked to see her speech on the news. More than 2 million people watched a video of her speech on Instagram. LeBrun’s friends jokingly asked for her autograph.

Later in March, LeBrun shared a similar message to a House committee. The bill passed the House and the Senate in April.

Walz visited Amira Choice on July 14 to sign the bill.

“Sometimes in the best intentions, we get in the way of things,” Walz said. “And this is one of those cases that government can get out of the way.”

LeBrun spoke after the lawmakers, wearing a red sticker that said “Raise your glass TO MINNESOTA SENIORS.”

“We raise our glasses not just for happy hour,” LeBrun said from behind a lectern, “but for independence.”

Five people, including LeBrun, grabbed tall glasses of sparkling wine after Walz signed the bill. The wine was alcohol-free; the law doesn’t take effect until Aug. 1. Before drinking, Hoffman said: “Here’s to good friends. Here’s to community. And here’s to Anita making a compelling argument.”

On Aug. 4 — the first Tuesday under the new law — staff members plan to serve wine and beer to residents. LeBrun said she’ll make sure to have a glass of pinot grigio.

Posted in Legislation, Retirement, Seniors | Leave a comment

Woman and Three ‘Gym Bros’ Perform a Coordinated Dance on Treadmills

Thanks to Bob Peterson for this Instagram post

https://www.instagram.com/reels/DbBA4CUiGqM

Posted in Humor | Leave a comment

Jimothy, Seattle’s beloved raccoon, inspires art auction and raises over $12K for local food bank

Thanks to Pam Peterson

He’s been called a legend, a cryptid, and an internet meme, but whatever you call him, Jimothy the Seattle raccoon has undoubtedly skyrocketed to fame in the short span of a week. 

Due to the shape of his distinct, rounded body, researchers believe that Jimothy has a rare congenital spine condition. Fortunately, he appears to be happy and mobile, roaming backyards and scurrying around trash cans like any other raccoon. 

Seattle residents have recorded clips of him through the years, including “baby footage” from Ballard local Ben Trammell, and the internet can’t get enough. 

Locally, his fame has inspired murals, tattoo flash sheets, and even a city proclamation

He also inspired Seattle artist Ryan Henry Ward. 

FOOTAGE OF JIMOTHY AS A BABY. SCREENSHOT/INSTAGRAM: @BWTRAMMELL

On July 18, Ward shared a photo of an original painting he made of the online icon, adding his own distinct touch of surrealism and forced perspective. 

“Jimothy. The hero we needed,” Ward wrote in the photo’s caption. “I’ve decided to give 100% of the money made from this painting to Ballard Food Bank, a place that helped me through some of my hardest times.”

Since the 1970s, Ballard Food Bank has been fighting food insecurity in northwest Seattle. With their unique “grocery store” model, locals in need can browse shelves and shop for everything from canned goods to fresh produce, hygiene items, and even pet food.

In the same post, Ward invited locals to make an offer in his direct messages. 

“The highest bid by midnight will get the painting, and the Ballard Food Bank will get a hook-up they deserve,” he said. 

Amidst a swell of local support in the comments, the brand account for Amazon also pledged to lend a hand. 

“What a fun way to celebrate a Seattle favorite while supporting a great cause,” the account commented on July 18. “We’re excited to match the winning auction donation to the Ballard Food Bank, and we’d love to see other Puget Sound companies join in too. Good luck to everyone bidding — and thanks, Henry, for using your art to give back!”

Within 24 hours, Ward announced the winner of the “Jimothy” painting.

RYAN HENRY WARD’S PAINTING “JIMOTHY.” SCREENSHOT/INSTAGRAM: @HENRY_BEYOND_MUSEUMS

“So many messages and so many huge hearts on the bid for the Jimothy painting,” he wrote on social media. “If you could glance at my DMs tonight, you’d see what a powerful altruistic community we have.

“The highest bid was $6,543.21 by Angela Galdabini,” he said. “The Ballard Food Bank will be receiving 100% of this. Thank you, Jimothy, for inspiring us all to greatness.”

On July 20, Ward showed a receipt of the donation going through. 

“Thanks to an awesome auction winner and to the power of community and in gratitude to Jimothy, Ballard Food Bank has received their donation and the world is a little better.”

Niche Ballard, a local art gallery, also shared the story on their social media page and praised Ward for his unique fundraising method. 

“Doing what you can to help others is amazing!” The art gallery commented beneath Ward’s announcement. “It doesn’t need to be perfectly run or a long-term commitment. You, Henry, stepped up in your way and helped neighbors in need. Bravo!”

For people looking for additional ways to support Ballard Food Bank, the art gallery announced that they were hosting a fundraiser from August 8 through August 30 with the Seattle Spoon Club, a woodcarving club that meets on the third Friday of every month at the Pratt Fine Arts Center in Seattle’s Central District. 

“The kickoff event is the Ballard Art Walk.” The art gallery shared. “Join us! We probably won’t raise as much as Ryan Henry Ward, but every bit helps.” 

Mary Montgomery added: Not only that, but I just heard on the radio that Amazon and a couple of other local companies each matched the amount, bringing it up to $45,000!!

Posted in Animals, Art, Charity, Education | Leave a comment

Spotted downtown on a World Cup day

Thanks to Mary Montgomery

Posted in Animals, Sports | Leave a comment

Frightening. Is this Munich 1933?

Thanks to John Roper

Goebbels could not have said it better.

“Fascism is the supreme expression of self-righteousness. It is the belief that one’s own group possesses a monopoly on virtue, and therefore has a holy duty to crush everyone else.” — George Orwell

Posted in Advocacy, Education, History, Politics | Leave a comment

Narcissus Seeing His Reflection

Ed.: Thanks to Janet Miller

Posted in environment, Ethics, Justice | 2 Comments

Seniors at the Crossroads Demonstration

Thanks to Judy Mayotte

Join us for the next Seniors at the Crossroads**demonstration. 

WHEN: Thursday, July 23

TIME:  4:30-5:30 p.m.

WHERE:  8th and Madison intersection

Our regular gatherings are on the second and fourth Thursdays at 4:30 p.m.  Mark your calendars.

Bring your signs and voices!

Posted in Advocacy, Politics | Leave a comment

The End of Reading Is Here

Optimists once believed that universal literacy was inevitable. Now it seems that the age of reading might be a short anomaly in human history.

By Rose Horowitch in The Atlantic (a subject for Guy Talk on Monday)

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Posted in artificial intelligence, Books, Education, Essays, language | Leave a comment

Let’s better equip the elevators for those inconvenient breakdowns

Thanks to David Pelton who notes that A J used his IT skills to render an elevator that accommodates all, but sadly has room for only two occupants!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Neighborhood Notice of Public Meeting

Found: this notice in the window of Coffee Tree on 9th between Cherry and James.

July 23, 2026 @ 6 PM – 7 PM at the Harborview Research and Training Building at 300 9th Ave. Seattle, WA 98104 Room 109 and 113.

The King County Harborview Construction and Infrastructure Division and Harborview Medical Center will discuss a phased project at 755 Alder St in Seattle.

The project includes a seven-level below-grade parking structure and future six-story shell and core of a medical office building. Meeting information collected may be made public.

learn more at HarborviewBondProgram.com/NinthandAlder, and Services.Seattle.gov (SDCI Project #: 3044234-LU)

Posted in Health, In the Neighborhood | Leave a comment

Mount Rushmore…or Less?

We the People must act quickly on an issue that’s absolutely rocking America…


by Parker J. Palmer (thanks to Mary Montgomery)

Mount Rushmore as created by God, Geology and Gutzon Borglum
“Life is a hard battle anyway. If we laugh and sing a little as we fight the good fight of freedom, it makes it all go easier. I will not allow my life’s light to be determined by the darkness around me.” —Sojourner Truth
I. POTUS has made it clear that, in his humble opinion, he deserves to have his image sculpted into South Dakota’s Mount Rushmore, alongside those of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. He is, after all, the greatest American president ever to bear the cross and wear the crown, a legend in his own mind.

While I’m sure his Mount Rushmore idea will meet with vast public support—or at least half-vast support—there’s a problem, as happens from time to time with POTUS’s Big Ideas. Experts say that adding a fifth head to the unstable rock next to Lincoln might bring the whole thing down.

This will not deter POTUS, of course. His ego is larger than any mountain, including Mount Sinai. But South Dakotans will surely balk at trashing one of their major tourist attractions, since another one—former Governor Kristi Noem—recently trashed herself. Wall Drug Store, thank God, carries on as if time were standing still.

II. But I digress. As a loyal citizen of the U.S., my purpose with this post is to propose two possible ways forward that will will keep Mount Rushmore intact and, more important, keep POTUS happy. As everyone knows, if POTUS ain’t happy, ain’t nobody happy.

My inspiration for all of this began with a photo taken on June 1, 2020, when POTUS staged a photo-op in front of St. John’s Episcopal Church in D.C., right after he used tear gas and flash-bangs to clear peaceful protestors from Lafayette Square.

Flanked by what appear to be poorly crafted cardboard cut-outs of Attorney General William Barr, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, and Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, POTUS has a Bible in his left hand and the forefinger of his right hand pressed to his lips, the universal sign for “shush.”

Talk about a picture being worth a thousand words! Here’s the Project 2025-MAGA playbook in a nutshell: get a “reality” TV star to play a faux “strong man,” surround him with spineless men and women, keep a Bible handy to invoke divine blessing, and get opponents and the free press to shut up. Toss in “keep the billionaires happy” and you’ve got the whole kielbasa.

June 1, 2020, in Washington, D.C., as POTUS tells his opponents to shut up
III. By now, maybe you can see where I’m going with this. (If so, I hope you’ll get professional help ASAP, lest you follow me around the bend.) Yes, I’m proposing that we start transforming Mount Rushmore as shown below, before POTUS tries to seize or blow up another country because his feelings are hurt. Time is of the essence.

Mount Rushmore as recreated by PJP and ChatGPT
Of course, a few picky readers are now saying, “Wait! Where did Abraham Lincoln go?” Please, people, follow the bouncing ball. Since we can’t carve a fifth head into the rock to the right of Lincoln without risking the whole thing, replacing Lincoln is the only way to go, if the Rushmore Solution is what we decide on.

Plus which, making this move would make POTUS even happier. He’s often said that, given the extraordinary accomplishments of his still-young second term, he’s a better president than Lincoln ever was. I rest my case.

IV. But now I can hear the voices of other picky readers saying, “I’d love to have this abusive father figure glaring at us day and night, threatening punishment for our sins. We’ve never had a president who knew more about sin. But who’s doing quality control on this project? POTUS is holding the Bible upside down!”

People. C’mon. What don’t you understand about symbolism in fine art? Clearly the upside-down Bible is a tribute to the regime for their absolute genius at turning an entire religious tradition on its head, and convincing millions of people that it means exactly the opposite of what it says.

Only a genius could take dozens of Biblical verses about the importance of caring for the stranger and turn them into, “Scoop ‘em up without warrants, shoot ‘em if need be, toss ‘em into for-profit detention camps, and deport ‘em to wherever you want.” Yet that’s the program that MAGA Christians are cheering for. IMHO, they deserve at least one public monument to their monumental mendacity.

V. But here’s the thing. I’m a political realist, so I know how easily a bill to redo Mount Rushmore could get swallowed up in the giant black hole we call Congress, never to be seen again until the Bermuda Triangle coughs up the Epstein files.

So I have an alternative proposal, one that might make everyone happy. Let’s erect a monument in POTUS’s home state of Florida, where things like this happen several times a week (see Dave Barry for details). To avoid confusion with South Dakota’s Mount Rushmore, let’s call the Florida version “Mount Shushmore.”

Mount Shushmore as envisioned by PJP and ChatGPT
There’s only one place in Florida where this monument will get the visibilty it deserves. The highest spot in the state is Britton Hill, which rises to 345 feet above sea level. Amazingly, it has also been called “the lowest high point in the United States”—which sounds like something future historians might say about this presidency.

So how about making a mountain out of this molehill? At very least, it would give us a place to scatter the ashes of what was once the world’s most promising experiment in democracy when MAGA and POTUS get done with burning us to the ground.

VI. With our democracy at risk, I’m not going to make the final decision on this by myself. Instead, I invite you to cast your votes in the comments section below, along with whatever messages you wish to leave behind for posterity. Vote early and vote often! Just be sure to bring proof of existence when you do. And don’t worry, this election is already rigged. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

Posted in Government, Parks, Remembrances | Leave a comment

The Living Presidents’ Call to Vote

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Trump setting stage to interfere with mid-term voting – views of Attorney Ty Cobb

Posted in Government, Voting | Leave a comment

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson scores as sports fan in chief

 

By David Horsey Seattle Times cartoonist

I am sure that when democratic socialist Katie Wilson was running for mayor she was thinking about how she would handle homelessness, strike the right balance on public safety and deal with downtown businesses that viewed her with suspicion. She certainly was not thinking about being the city’s sports mayor.

But, here she is, forced to be a big fan, even if she cannot tell a pick six from a bicycle kick.

Wilson’s first half year as Seattle’s mayor began with the Seahawks winning the Super Bowl and is now ending with World Cup fever overtaking the city. In between, she has gone to at least one Storm basketball game and an outing with the Mariners. Before her term is up, she may be overseeing the long-awaited return of the Sonics to Seattle.

Wilson says she is having fun with all this sports activity and, whether or not she would really rather be doing something else, it is probably politically smart for her to be in the stands cheering. Grim, overly zealous radicals with bullhorns at their lips rapidly grate on people, but someone with the same concerns about social justice can win over a lot of skeptics just by showing she is not that different from everyone else.

Being a sports mayor just might help Katie Wilson become a successful mayor.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

It’s how you look at it!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Charlie’s trip to the ER

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

‘Animal rescue mission was like a Terminator film’

Thanks to Pam Peterson

Lewis AdamsEssex

Nowzad Pen Farthing holding a small dog with light brown fur inside a blue shelter. He is wearing a green T-shirt and smiling.
Pen Farthing made two trips to Ukraine between April and June to help rescue animals

A former Royal Marine said the drone warfare he witnessed in eastern Ukraine was “like something out of a Terminator movie”.

Paul “Pen” Farthing, from Dovercourt, Essex, rescued 194 animals from the front line in Kramatorsk between April and June.

Russian troops have been advancing towards the city, which is one of Ukraine’s last remaining strongholds in the east.

“I’d hate to be a soldier right now,” said Farthing, who toured Afghanistan as a commando between 2006 and 2007.

“It sounds incredibly scary to be on the front line and know a drone is hunting you. It’s like something out of a Terminator movie. It’s crazy.”

Nowzad Pen Farthing and a woman are surrounded by dogs on a sandy track next to a white building. Some of the dogs are in cages and others are walking around.
Farthing and his team racked up more than 15,000 miles during their two daring operations

Farthing made headlines when he returned to Afghanistan in 2021, helping to extract 67 people and about 150 animals.

He racked up more than 15,000 miles (more than 24,000km) during two high-stakes missions to Ukraine, rescuing, dogs, cats and farm animals, and returned to the UK in June.

Working with other volunteers, including vet Angela Stoop, Farthing took the animals to shelters in safer locations ahead of rehoming them.

They had to dodge drones during their latest daring operation – weapons Farthing told the BBC he was “extremely grateful” the Taliban never had.

“It was incredibly different from what I experienced as a Royal Marine back in Afghanistan,” he said.

“Sadly, the Ukrainian people are now having to live through this every single day.”

A map showing the city of Kostyantynivka in eastern Ukraine – with red areas to the east under Russian control.

Farthing first visited Ukrainian animal shelters in 2022, shortly after Russia launched its invasion.

He said Kramatorsk had changed dramatically since then and “there is not a single road that is safe” today.

“The van I was in was going nothing less than 110mph, and we were the only vehicle on the road,” the veteran added.

Nowzad Pen Farthing loading a grey crate containing an animal into a white van full of other crates. He is wearing a black T-shirt and has sunglasses on top of his head.
Farthing is “incredibly proud” of his team and charity donors

He thanked supporters of his charity, Nowzad, and appealed for help in funding future efforts, including paying for shelters, animal food and medication.

Reflecting on his team’s work, Farthing said: “I feel incredibly proud. It’s amazing that people are willing to put themselves on the line like that to come in and support.”

Posted in Animals, Politics | Leave a comment

What the World Cup taught us

Thanks to John Roper

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Don’t turn off my TV!

Thanks to Mary Jane Francis

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

In Israel, Rahm Emanuel Calls for End of Unconditional U.S. Support

Ed note: The Emanuel family is quite amazing. All three sons–Rahm, Ezekiel and Ari–are highly accomplished. Their father a pediatrician, was born in Jerusalem. Intellectual debate was part of their dinner table conversation growing up.

The former Chicago mayor, a Democrat exploring a 2028 presidential run, delivered a speech in Tel Aviv that was sharply critical of Benjamin Netanyahu.

Rahm Emanuel speaks at a white podium in front of flowers.
Rahm Emanuel, the former Chicago mayor and White House chief of staff, is trying to chart a course between the anti-Israel left and the pro-Israel right.Credit…Amir Cohen/Reuters

By David M. Halbfinger in the NYT

Rahm Emanuel, the former Chicago mayor and White House chief of staff who is exploring a 2028 presidential run, landed in Israel this week with a stern tough-love message for America’s most embattled, isolated ally — a message that he hopes could point the way forward on one of the most divisive issues in U.S. politics.

Unconditional U.S. support of Israel should end, Mr. Emanuel bluntly warned in a speech at Tel Aviv University on Wednesday, demanding that Israel make major changes if it is to retain U.S. backing at its historic strength.

Above all, he said, Israel will need to allow again for the possibility of Palestinian sovereignty and give up on dreams of annexing all of the West Bank.

He said that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government have isolated Israel and led it “into a dead end” and argued that Mr. Netanyahu sees every security problem as a nail and military action as the only hammer.

“It should be obvious that strategic isolation is not a foundation for security,” Mr. Emanuel said. “It’s a countdown clock.”

At a time when Israel is hemorrhaging support in the United States, and especially in the Democratic Party, Mr. Emanuel is trying to chart a course between the anti-Israel left and the pro-Israel right.

Not surprisingly, Mr. Emanuel, whose career in Democratic politics has involved considerable friction with the party’s left, positioned himself in what he portrays as a realistic middle, between demonstrators chanting, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” and right-wing Israelis pushing to swallow up the West Bank as part of “Greater Israel.”

“Both are fantasies chanted by fanatics,” he said.

Mr. Emanuel’s ideas break little ground, however, and his overall rethinking of the U.S.-Israel relationship comes after many Democrats have already made a similar turn. A New York Times/Siena poll this spring found that 60 percent of Democratic supporters said they were more sympathetic to Palestinians than Israelis; only 15 percent were more supportive of Israel.

Like a growing number of Democrats — and like Mr. Netanyahu himself, of late — Mr. Emanuel called for an end to U.S. military aid to Israel, saying bluntly that Israel was wealthy enough to buy weapons like any other ally. He said that he would use sanctions, much as former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. did, to fight both construction of illegal settlements and violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.

But Mr. Emanuel also offered a carrot to Israelis who may be uneasy with their diminished international standing but are warier than ever, after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on southern Israel, of a Palestinian state next door.

In his speech, he sketched out an idea for a new peace process aimed at a “23-state solution” whose broad contours resemble the Arab Peace Initiative proposed by Saudi Arabia in 2002. Israel would win recognition from and full diplomatic relations with all 22 members of the Arab League, who in turn would back the creation of a new Palestinian entity.

How such an entity might achieve sovereignty, and how Israel’s security would be guaranteed, would all need to be negotiated, Mr. Emanuel said in an interview Tuesday night in Jerusalem. But he said he had yet to see better ideas for how to address Israel’s predicament and its plummeting support in the United States.

“You can’t beat something with nothing,” he said, quoting his onetime boss, former President Bill Clinton.

Mr. Emanuel said little about what he would do about Israel’s conflict with Iran, instead singing the praises of an international plan for an economic corridor linking India, the Middle East and Europe, as a way to bypass the Strait of Hormuz. He said it would turn Israel and several Gulf countries into “indispensable nodes” in the global supply chain.

But he criticized Mr. Netanyahu for having campaigned against former President Barack Obama’s Iran nuclear deal, and then having persuaded President Trump to torpedo it.

“And look what happened,” he said Wednesday. “You’ve lost ground. You’re less safe today, not more.”

He also faulted Mr. Netanyahu for squandering what he described as a golden opportunity to reach at least a security agreement with Syria under its new leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, who has said that Israel and Syria share a common enemy in Iran.

“Everybody knows you know how to use an F-35,” he said, saying that Israel needed at least to “pick up the phone” and make an effort.

“If you can’t do it, get caught trying to do it,” he said.

Whether Israelis will heed him is uncertain, but Mr. Emanuel brings considerable credibility as a longstanding supporter of the country. His father was born in Jerusalem and fought in Israel’s war for independence. He was an adviser to Mr. Clinton during the signing of the Oslo accords in 1993 and, informally, during the Camp David peace talks in 2000.

He also has some firsthand experience with the Israeli right. Speaking to reporters Wednesday, Mr. Emanuel noted that in 2010, when he brought his son to the Western Wall to celebrate his bar mitzvah, Itamar Ben-Gvir, a right-wing extremist, was arrested while protesting Mr. Emanuel’s presence there. Mr. Ben-Gvir is now Israel’s minister of national security.

In his speech, sponsored by Tel Aviv University’s Center for the Study of the United States, Mr. Emanuel was an equal-opportunity blame-placer. He called the Palestinian leadership corrupt and said that Arab leaders who have “exploited Palestinian rights as a slogan for decades” needed now to help create a new Palestinian entity capable of “accepting the historic Jewish connection to this land.”

But he expressed far more outrage toward the Israeli right, over land grabs and violence against Palestinians.

“Your government is complicit in the horrors now being inflicted on innocent families in the West Bank,” he said. “That undermines your international legitimacy, was a small nation, at a time when you can least afford it.”

Adding that “we’ve done you no favors by averting our eyes,” Mr. Emanuel said that he would impose sanctions on Israeli individuals who attack Palestinians or their property, and on Israeli officials who support such violence. Perhaps more significantly, he would impose sanctions on construction companies or banks involved in illegal settlement construction.

Mr. Emanuel, who boasts of having incurred Mr. Netanyahu’s anger during the Obama administration, repeatedly attacked the prime minister. He partly blamed U.S. policymakers over the years who believed “that the best thing Washington could do for Jerusalem was to blindly and silently stand behind your government.”

That, he said, produced a prime minister who could count on paying little price “if he ignored America’s concerns about settlements and sparked a regional war.” It allowed Israel to deny food and medical relief to suffering Gazans, “leaving the world to conclude that Israelis not only want to kill Palestinians” but are “completely indifferent to their death,” destruction and suffering. And it emboldened a governing coalition, he said, that learned that it could burn West Bank farmland and “terrorize Palestinian families without consequence.”

He also faulted Mr. Netanyahu for refusing to plan for the day after the war in Gaza, leaving Israel stuck in a holding pattern of “occupation and isolation.”

“Hamas’s goal on Oct. 7 was not just to kill and abuse as many Israelis as possible — it was to extinguish the idea that one day, Israelis and Palestinians could live side by side and find common ground,” he said. “The tragedy is that Netanyahu has helped Hamas achieve that objective.”

Mr. Emanuel’s audience of students and Tel Aviv liberals appeared to have been well chosen for the occasion. When he alluded to this year’s elections — the election of a new government in Israel in October, and the U.S. midterms in November — he spoke of his unhappiness with the Trump administration.

“We’re going to have a correction this fall,” he said.

A man in the audience responded: “So are we.”

Posted in Crime, Ethics, Government, History, Justice, Kindness, Law | Leave a comment

A trip to the ER

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why a Standard Living Will May Fall Short if You Develop Dementia

By Cheryl Winokur Munk in the Wall Street Journal

Illustration of a human head in profile with papers appearing to float or fly out from the top and back of the head.

Sharing your wishes for medical care and end-of-life decisions should be standard practices for people as they age. But for people with dementia, the usual advance directives—such as a living will and a durable power of attorney for healthcare—may not be detailed enough.

That’s why documents called dementia directives are gaining popularity, to help people make decisions about their care if they’ve been diagnosed with dementia or there is a high likelihood they could be in the future.

It’s something for everyone to at least think about, given that there’s a 42% risk of Americans developing dementia after age 55, according to a study published in Nature Medicine in January 2025.

With that in mind, here’s what you need to know about dementia directives:

What’s in a dementia directive?

Broadly speaking, dementia directives spell out a person’s wishes for care at different stages of the disease. This includes the types of medical interventions you might want if you have mild dementia, moderate dementia and severe dementia.

For instance, says Elizabeth Edgerly, senior director, community programs and services, for the Alzheimer’s Association, you might want to continue your daily medications at one stage, while later, you might only want what’s needed to keep you comfortable and not prolong your life with medication.

Different versions of directives are available free online, including one from Dartmouth College and another developed by Dr. Barak Gaster, a professor at the University of Washington School of Medicine. People can choose whichever works best as a framework for their wishes.

The Dartmouth version, for example, has a section on nutritional support during the stages of dementia and an option to indicate preferences for participating in research, while Gaster’s document focuses more on goals for medical care for a person with mild, moderate or severe dementia. But whatever directive you use, you can also add any instructions and preferences that aren’t already outlined.

The version you use is less important than having a conversation with family members about your wishes and getting them in writing, says Dr. Robert V. Brody, a physician in San Francisco who is the board president of End of Life Choices California, a nonprofit focused on helping individuals and families navigate end-of-life issues.

Is it legally binding?

Dementia directives are not legal documents. Rather, they should be used alongside documents like a living will and healthcare proxy, says Sheryl J. Dennis, partner at Fields & Dennis in Wellesley, Mass., to spark conversations among families and document a person’s wishes in writing.

They allow people to be more specific about their dementia-related care than a standard advance directive, says Robert Santulli, a senior lecturer in the department of psychological and brain sciences at Dartmouth, who co-created the Dartmouth dementia directive. Attorneys can work specific language about dementia care into advance directives, but for many people, having a dementia directive as an addendum is a cost-effective option.

As a primary care-doctor, Gaster has seen numerous families struggle to make decisions on behalf of loved ones with dementia. They wish they had had conversations and documented the family member’s wishes before the disease took over, he says.

Unlike other life-threatening diseases, like kidney failure or heart failure, dementia causes people to lose the ability to direct their own care fairly far in advance of their death, Gaster says. “It’s the most common reason that people lose decision-making capacity for often a year or two or three years before they die,” he says.

How can it help caregivers?

Bob Knickerbocker of Seattle filled out a dementia directive after being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s. His wife, Linda, age 88, says filling out a dementia directive was an opportunity for her family to discuss Bob’s wishes and agree on his care.

He made clear in those discussions and in the directive that he didn’t want extra medicine or treatments at the later stages of his disease, which gave Linda reassurance when she directed doctors to discontinue blood thinners meant to treat blood clots that had developed in his lungs.

Bob was adamant about not being remanded to a nursing home. “He wanted to be at home, not in a strange bed somewhere. He didn’t want the whole atmosphere of the nursing home,” Linda says. Honoring his wishes, Linda arranged for in-home hospice, and her husband of 65 years died in January 2025 at age 89.

Who should consider one?

Anyone can fill one out, but it’s especially advisable for people with a family history of dementia or who have been diagnosed. But there’s also no harm in filling one out well before your senior years.

Some people may feel it’s enough to give verbal instructions. However, Jonathan White, trusts and estates partner with Jordan & White in Danvers, Mass., says it’s better to get your wishes in writing, even if it’s just for the caregiver’s peace of mind.

“It’s nice to have a paper backup, because if you’re in a position that you have to make a decision, it’s nice to have reassurance that you’re doing what the person wanted you to do,” he says.

Posted in Dementia, end of life, Uncategorized | Leave a comment