Earth Day 2026: How to Celebrate Earth Day

or this? (thanks to Pearl McE.)

To learn more click here!

Posted in Advocacy, environment | Leave a comment

Peptides, explained: Answers to your top questions

by Katelyn Jetelina in Your Local Epidemiologist

Ed note:  Sir William Osler (1849–1919), a foundational figure in modern medicine, once stated: “The desire to take medicine is perhaps the greatest feature which distinguishes man from animals”.

“Peptides” is a very broad category, so each one lies on a spectrum ranging from “decades of human research” to “never been tested in humans.”

Evidence table for some peptides. Table by Your Local Epidemiologist

BPC-157 and TB-500, the two peptides generating a lot of attention right now, sit firmly in the “potentially promising animal studies” category. Rat studies show interesting effects: accelerated tendon and ligament healing, gut lining repair, reduced inflammation across multiple tissue types, and improved muscle recovery. TB-500 has even been studied and subsequently banned for use in racehorses, which tells you something about how seriously the performance world takes it, even without human data.

But animals aren’t humans. Rats heal differently, metabolize compounds differently, and are studied under controlled conditions that don’t reflect the complexity of human biology, health history, or dosing. There are many medicines that look remarkable in animals and fail, sometimes dangerously, in human trials.

For BPC-157, there are a few, very small human pilots, but no randomized controlled trials. TB-500 itself has not been studied in human trials, though its parent molecule (which isn’t identical), thymosin beta-4, has progressed to Phase I trials for specific conditions in China.

Other peptides that you see on social media may not even have evidence from animal studies.

In conclusion, the people currently using these compounds are, in effect, running an uncontrolled experiment on themselves. (continued on Page 2 or here)

Posted in Health | Leave a comment

Seniors at the Crossroads Demonstration

Thanks to Judy M.

Hello friends,

Join us for the next Seniors at the Crossroads** demonstration:

WHEN: Thursday, April 23

MEETING TIME: 4:30-5:30 p.m.

WHERE: 8TH and Madison intersection

Our regular gatherings are on the second and fourth Thursdays at 4:30. Mark your calendars.

Bring your signs and voices!

NOTE: Please notify us if you do not want these emails.

NOTE:  On Friday, May 1st, workers, students and families across the country will rally, march, and take action to demand a nation that puts workers over billionaires, with many refusing business as usual – “No School. No Work. No Shopping.”  In Seattle, there will be a noon rally at Cal Anderson Park, followed by a march.

Seniors at the Crossroads Steering Committee

**Seniors at the Crossroads is an informal network of seniors who regularly gather at their nearby busy crossroads and intersections to use their First Amendment rights in defense of the Constitution, the Rule of Law, and Justice.  We call for a country that values and cares for all its people.  Twice a month, on the second and fourth Thursdays, our local group gathers for an hour, with home-made signs and our voices, to defend these principles.  We meet from 4:30 to 5:30 pm.

Posted in Advocacy, protests | Leave a comment

New Vaccine Recommendations Page from DOH

Thanks to Ed M.

The Washington State Department of Health (DOH) has launched a new Vaccine Recommendations webpage in response to House Bill 2242 (PDF). The page provides current state immunization recommendations and related guidance for health care providers and local health jurisdictions.

It includes PDF schedules for childhood and adolescent and adult immunizations, along with answers to frequently asked questions. Recommendations are based on evidence from leading medical and public health organizations and outline who should receive vaccines, when, and under what conditions. 

All vaccines recommended by DOH remain available at no cost for children under age 19 through Washington’s Childhood Vaccine Program (CVP) at participating providers. Uninsured adults ages 19 and older can receive recommended vaccines at no cost through the Adult Vaccine Program (AVP). 

For additional information, visit the Immunizations and Vaccines page. For questions about Washington’s immunization recommendations, contact OI@doh.wa.gov.

Visit the new Vaccine Recommendations webpage to learn more.

Posted in Health, Vaccines | Leave a comment

Robots just installed 100 MW of solar panels in the desert

Robots are helping humans install solar panels at previously impossible rates

By Skye Jacobs in Technospot (thanks to Pam P.)

Robots just installed 100 MW of solar panels in the desert

The takeaway: The expansion of automation in renewable energy construction has taken a significant step forward in California’s Mojave Desert, where a fleet of Maximo robots has completed the installation of 100 megawatts of solar capacity at AES’s Bellefield solar complex – one of the largest demonstrations to date of field robotics operating at utility scale. The project marks a shift for solar construction, an industry traditionally dependent on manual labor.

According to Maximo, its Version 3.0 robots now enable crews to install solar panels at rates previously impossible by human teams alone. Workers using the robots have been able to place as many as 24 photovoltaic modules per hour per person, supported by machines that assemble panels at a rate of more than one per minute. This pace – nearly doubling throughput compared with other large-scale photovoltaic sites across Southern California – highlights the growing role of robotics in a process that has long been labor-intensive.

“Reaching 100 MW is an important milestone for Maximo and for the role robotics can play in solar construction,” said Chris Shelton, president of Maximo. “It demonstrates that field robotics can move beyond experimentation and deliver consistent results at utility scale.”

For Maximo, the Bellefield deployment also demonstrates how industrial AI systems can accelerate robotics development. The company built and refined its robotic models using Nvidia and Amazon Web Services cloud technologies. By leveraging Nvidia’s AI infrastructure, Omniverse simulation libraries, and the Isaac Sim robotics development platform, engineers were able to digitally model and stress-test robot movements before deploying updates to live sites. According to Maximo, this approach has shortened development cycles and improved performance confidence across its growing robotic fleet.

The Bellefield complex, which will eventually exceed 1 gigawatt of generation capacity, is part of a wave of large-scale solar and storage projects across the American Southwest. These developments are arriving at a moment of heightened urgency for energy diversification.

With energy markets still rattled by the ongoing Middle East conflict and depleted fossil fuel supplies, the need for reliable, carbon-free generation has become acute, especially as new data centers and electric vehicle infrastructure place additional pressure on the grid.

This convergence of rising energy demand and industrial labor shortages has made automation particularly attractive to developers. Construction remains one of the most labor-constrained sectors in the US, prompting growing interest in robotics platforms that can supplement human workforces while improving throughput and consistency.

Maximo’s achievement offers a glimpse of what widespread robotic integration could mean – not just for renewable energy projects, but for heavy construction more broadly.

Posted in Climate, Science and Technology | Leave a comment

The Erratic President and FBI Director

by Heather Cox Richardson (thanks to Pam P.)

Late Saturday evening, Josh Dawsey and Annie Linskey of the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump was so unstable and angry after learning on April 3 that Iranians had shot down an American jet that his aides kept him out of the room as they received updates, simply telling him what was going on at important moments.

The journalists describe an erratic president who entered the war after Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu convinced him the Iranian people would support such strikes and after his successful extraction of Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro and his wife Celia Flores convinced him the military could pull off another quick victory. He seemed to believe that if his gamble worked, he would be saving the world.

But while the strikes did indeed kill Iran’s top leaders and badly damage its military, the Iranians closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump did not foresee this outcome, although he was warned of it. He told his team that the Iranian government would give up before it closed the strait and, if it did manage to close the strait, the U.S. military would handle it. The journalists report Trump has “marveled at the ease with which the strait was closed.”

Once the strait was closed, the president flipped back and forth between demanding other countries help reopen it and insisting the U.S. didn’t need any help, between wanting to fight and calling for negotiations. On April 5, Easter morning, after the recovery of the second airman, he turned to trying to scare Iranian leaders into reopening the strait and ending the conflict, warning: “Open the F*ckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell.”

He added an Islamic prayer to be as insulting as possible, he later told senior administration officials. That, like his threat that “a whole civilization will die tonight,” was “improvisational,” officials told Dawsey and Linskey.

Seemingly unable to figure out how to find a way out of the war, Trump has told aides he wants to focus on other topics, and shifted his attention to fundraising events for the midterms or details for his ballroom. Clara Ence Morse and Dan Diamond of the Washington Post offered proof of Trump’s growing enthusiasm for his ballroom, noting that he has called public attention to it on about a third of the days this year, mentioning it less than tariffs or Iran but more than healthcare insurance or affordability. And his focus on it has increased as the year has progressed. (continued on Page 2 or here)

Posted in Addiction, Government, Mental Health, War | Leave a comment

Hegseth – Slammed for Pulp Fiction Prayer

Posted in Military, prayer, Religion | Leave a comment

How you might feel a few months from now

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why the Stock Market Makes No Sense Right Now

By Kyla Scanlon

Ms. Scanlon, a contributing Opinion writer, is the author of “In This Economy? How Money & Markets Really Work” and Kyla’s Newsletter.

The stock market has been trying to ignore the war in Iran. That’s been true over weeks of escalation and de-escalation, cease-fires, a blockade, and a blockade of a blockade (now just a U.S. blockade). Markets have barely flinched, even as crude oil prices swing wildly each day and the world’s supply chains begin to shake.

The word to describe what is happening is “shrug.” The problem is not a lack of information. There is too much information, arriving in late-night social media posts and endless push notifications. These days when I see “Breaking News,” it feels like there’s an emphasis on “breaking,” in the sense of “Things are broken.”

The stock market has decided this available information is not relevant. That is a problem for all of us. President Trump deeply cares about the stock market, and if the stock market had been selling off, there is a good chance that this war would have been over a while ago. More broadly, the markets are showing the single lesson that the past 40 years have taught them.

It will always be saved.

Markets are not properly pricing risk, because they really don’t have to. They have assumed that the U.S. government will not allow them to implode, and that assumption is putting the world economy at stake. What’s more, the new rescuer investors are counting on — artificial intelligence — is vulnerable to the exact risks markets are ignoring.

This has huge consequences.

When Paul Volcker took the reins of the Federal Reserve in 1979, he showed that the central bank was willing to use rates as a blunt instrument. He hiked the federal funds rate above 20 percent to crush inflation, deliberately inducing a recession. It was brutal and effective, with unemployment rising and inflation cratering. His efforts saved the economy by destroying it, while establishing the precedent that the Fed could and would move the economy.

Alan Greenspan imparted the same lesson, but in an inverted way. Where Mr. Volcker disciplined markets, Mr. Greenspan rescued them. When the stock market crashed in October 1987, on a day known as Black Monday, Mr. Greenspan flooded the system with liquidity and cut rates.

The market recovered — and a template was born. In the late 1990s, the potential of a Long-Term Capital Management collapse and the dot-com bubble were met with Fed support. The markets learned: When things break, someone saves us.

That implication has a nickname — the “Greenspan put.” The implicit understanding (never written or formalized) is that the Fed would ease monetary policy whenever asset prices fell hard enough. It was necessary in many situations, but it also created a reflex.

For example, in 2008, Ben Bernanke, then the Fed chair, took rates close to zero and carried out three rounds of quantitative easing in response to the financial crisis. The Fed deployed trillions of dollars in asset purchases at a staggering scale and became a direct buyer in markets.

The markets came to expect a form of salvation. In fact, markets expected so much support that they threw what were called “tantrums” when they didn’t get it — as in 2013’s “taper tantrum,” when Mr. Bernanke suggested (suggested) that the Fed would be buying up fewer bonds. The bond market freaked out, with the 10-year yield jumping from 2 percent to 3 percent in a few months, setting off a cascade of depreciation in emerging-market currencies. The markets learned: They could demand rescue.

Then Covid happened. Both Congress and the Fed deployed trillions in combined and coordinated fiscal and monetary support within weeks at breakneck speed and scale. The stock market hit all-time highs within months of the worst economic shock since the Great Depression.

Markets inferred a guarantee. They’re running the same pattern: This is really bad, but we’ll get saved, so buy the dip.

The problem is that the rescue infrastructure is exhausted. The Fed is trapped. Inflationary pressures mean that rate cuts, the most powerful tool in the monetary tool kit, could risk making things worse. The Greenspan “put” is not really in the cards.

Fiscal policy is equally constrained. U.S. debt levels have reached a point at which any new spending programs face real limits. The dollar’s role as the global reserve currency is showing cracks. Foreign holders of Treasuries are watching U.S. policy with increasing skepticism.

What’s left? TACO, short for Trump Always Chickens Out: the strategy, if it can be called that, of substituting narrative for economic reality. Announce a tariff pause, stocks go up. Leak a deal, stocks go up. Post that “a whole civilization will die tonight,” stocks go up. The crisis becomes content, something to produce and consume and trade around, the way one trades around earnings or the weather.

But narrative management isn’t a functioning policy tool, because it doesn’t do anything other than distract and delay. It doesn’t restructure debt, lower interest rates, secure supply chains or produce more oil.

The only real backstop, if you look at where the money is going, is artificial intelligence.

This reliance on A.I. looks like an extraordinary concentration of bets. The Magnificent 7 (Google’s parent, Alphabet; Amazon; Apple; Facebook’s parent, Meta; Microsoft; Nvidia; and Tesla) are over 30 percent of the S&P 500, up from about 12 percent a decade ago. The four largest hyperscalers — Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon — are projected to spend nearly $700 billion combined in 2026 on A.I. infrastructure, an increase of more than 60 percent from last year, and are spending so aggressively that they’re likely straining their cash cushions.

The implicit argument embedded in current valuations across both public and private markets is that A.I. will be productive enough to offset an economic downturn as the economy loses jobs from A.I. The valuations also suggest that the A.I. industry will be efficient enough to navigate an energy crisis with the knowledge to reroute supply chains disrupted by, say, war.

Behind that sits an even deeper assumption: that if A.I. falters, the government will do everything it can, even with its constraints, to save the industry through all elements of support. We already see this with accelerated data center permittingmajor Pentagon contracts, a largely hands-off regulatory approach and state data center tax breaks. This redirects moral hazard from “the Fed will bail out the banks” to “the government will bail out A.I.” Call it the A.I. put — and this isn’t a critique of A.I. companies. They are responding to the incentives of a favorable policy environment.

But A.I. is not at all safe from the risks that markets are ignoring. If anything, it’s extraordinarily exposed to them.

A.I. is one of the most energy-intensive technologies ever built. In Virginia, where data centers are most concentrated, they already consume 26 percent of the state’s electricity. Nationwide, data centers consumed more than 4 percent of electricity last year, and that’s projected to reach as much as 12 percent by 2028. The technology that markets are counting on to save them is one of the first things to get squeezed if we have a full-blown energy crisis.

A.I. is also enormously dependent on stable global supply chains, particularly for advanced semiconductors. The chips that power these models are manufactured in a small number of facilities, mostly in Taiwan, and are largely shipped through contested waterways and subject to geopolitical leverage (like blockades).

The productivity miracle hasn’t come close to what valuations require. Now, it may happen. But the distance between “may” and “has” is the distance between a thesis and a prayer, and markets are very much pricing the prayer.

What do we do about it? Risk pricing needs to be honest and reckon with reality. We need insurance in case A.I. doesn’t deliver, as Asad Ramzanali, my colleague and the director of artificial intelligence and technology policy at the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator, suggests in a paper, “After the A.I. Crash.” He proposes solutions like a piece of legislation akin to the Glass-Steagall Act (which limited the power of commercial banks to engage in securities transactions) for A.I., which would separate model makers from data center owners. He also suggests a digital Works Progress Administration for workers who lose their jobs. And he argues that if the government does end up rescuing A.I. companies, any financial relief should come with public equity stakes, so that the public, which is already underwriting much of the risk, also shares in the upside.

The problem isn’t just the war, or the energy crisis, or the debt levels, or the trapped Fed, or the fragility of the A.I. supply chain. It’s all of them simultaneously, potentially compounding one another, processed by a market that believes it will be saved.

Posted in Economics, Finance | Leave a comment

A German View

Thanks to Pearl McE

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

When life was a bit simpler

thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This War Has Not Gone Putin’s Way

Credit…Hector Retamal/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

By Serge Schmemann

Mr. Schmemann, an Opinion writer, is a former Moscow bureau chief of The Times.See more of our coverage in your search results.

The Iran war has been an economic windfall for Russia, pushing oil prices sky-high and loosening sanctions. But if the Russian economy is having a brief respite, the battering of Iran by the United States and Israel marks yet another in a series of recent blows to the great-power role President Vladimir Putin so cherishes.

Iran has been Russia’s closest partner in the Middle East, supplying Moscow with drones for use in Ukraine and a critical route to evade sanctions over its war there. The large-scale damage to Iran’s economy and military comes on the heels of the capture of the Kremlin’s South American ally Nicolás Maduro in an American raid on Venezuela in January. Before that, the Kremlin was unable to prevent the fall of another comrade-dictator when Bashar al-Assad was toppled in Syria (and subsequently fled to Moscow). That left the future of Russia’s military bases in Syria in question.

“And Cuba’s next, by the way, but pretend I didn’t say that,” Mr. Trump playfully said at a meeting of investors at the end of March, threatening another This War Has Not Gone Putin’s Way Russian ally. Cuba is already in dire economic straits with the cutoff of Venezuelan oil and intensified American embargoes, and it was only with U.S. permission that Russia was able to send a tanker of oil to the island late last month. Russia is dispatching a second tanker, but the Trump administration has not said whether it will be allowed to reach Cuba.

Russia, moreover, has been excluded from any say in the future of Iran or its other allies. Instead, Russian oil companies are being squeezed out of post-Maduro Venezuela. In January, U.S. forces showed no compunction about seizing a Russian tanker that purportedly violated sanctions on dealing with Venezuela.

That cavalier treatment must be painful for Mr. Putin, who longs to restore his country’s global clout to Soviet levels. President Trump’s mysterious affinity for the Russian strongman has been a major card in Mr. Putin’s hand, one he has hoped to parlay into Washington’s support for the victory he seeks in Ukraine: the capture of the whole of the Donbas region and the neutralization of Ukraine. Accordingly, Mr. Putin has avoided criticizing Mr. Trump personally for the fate of his friends. (continued on Page 2 or here)

Posted in Government, War | Leave a comment

Report from Senator Jamie Pedensen

Thanks to Mary Jane F.

Sen. Jamie Pedersen
Dear friends and neighbors,One of my top priorities is to protect our state as the Trump administration assaults the rule of law, undermines science, and targets vulnerable communities in Washington. The Legislature took significant steps this session to defend our hard-fought rights and values in all of those areas. Just this week, the president signed an unlawful order targeting our secure and successful state voting systems.

I’m grateful to our Attorney General Nick Brown for his many efforts to fight back on behalf of Washington residents.The state’s supplemental operating budget signed into law this week will help protect Washingtonians’ core needs, while mitigating harms from the Trump Administration. The budget will provide food benefits for 30,000 immigrants with lawful status denied SNAP benefits, backfill Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, and provide healthcare for very ill or disabled Washingtonians who were kicked off Medicaid.Democrats in Olympia have been pushing back against Trump since we took back the majority in 2018 and that work will continue. Here are several bills passed this year that will help protect our state from federal overreach:
SB 5855 prohibits law enforcement, local police, federal agents, and immigration officers, from wearing masks during public interactions. It ensures transparency, accountability, and public trust by requiring officers’ faces to be visible and mandates display of identifying information while performing routine duties such as stops, patrols, arrests, and crowd control.
HB 2105 requires employers to notify workers about federal I-9 form audits, protects against retaliation, limits federal access to employment records, and establishes enforcement mechanisms and penalties to ensure that workers’ rights are respected.
SB 6002 establishes reasonable regulations on automated license plate reader cameras – such as the Flock cameras– to prevent their use by immigration enforcement and provide true community safety for all Washingtonians.
HB 2242 preserves continued access to affordable preventive health care services in Washington, including vaccines. The legislation updates state law so coverage of vaccines is tied to recommendations from the Washington State Department of Health instead of federal guidance.
SB 5892 protects sensitive voter information by designating certain information (full birthdate, SSN, driver’s license number) as confidential. An election officer or designee who discloses confidential voter information will be guilty of a class C felony.
HB 2165 prohibits individuals who are not law enforcement officers from making, providing, or possessing badges or other law enforcement insignias.
SB 5974 ensures law enforcement leaders are held to the same standards of professionalism and accountability that we ask of every other officer in the state. It will now be clear that a sheriff’s duty, first and foremost, is to uphold the Constitution and the laws of Washington state, including the Keep Washington Working Act, which is critical for the safety of our immigrant community, as well as gun violence prevention laws, such as ensuring weapons are removed from domestic violence abusers.
Thank you for taking the time to read this newsletter. If you missed my newsletters on the Millionaires Tax or affordable housing, they are available on my website. Please don’t hesitate to reach out to me with any questions at Jamie.Pedersen@leg.wa.gov.Best wishes,Jamie 
Posted in Government | Leave a comment

Now say it right

Thanks to John R.

Ed note: There are several poems about the weird names in our state. Here’s one.

“Washington Names — The Definitive (and Slightly Silly) Version”

There’s a place called Humptulips,
And Hoquiam by the sea,
And a valley called Hamma Hamma
Where a maiden’s heart went “hama hama”
When her young man bent the knee.

He took her up to Spokane—
Or so the story ran,
But after all the talking done,
It turned out well, “Spoke Anne.”

They honeymooned in Puyallup,
Or tried their best to go,
But every time they said the name
The locals answered, “No…”

They hurried on to Sequim next
(Pronounced “skwim,” not “seem”),
And wondered why those extra vowels
Were in that tricky scheme.

Then down through Steilacoom they drove,
And onward without pause,
To Wenatchee’s sunny hills
And Okanogan’s draws.

You may boast of Massachusetts,
Or Mississippi’s flow,
But Washington has names that twist
Your tongue at every go.

You can study them and practice,
You can say them loud and slow,
But unless you’re born a native,
They’ll betray you when you go.

So when you visit Washington,
And try to speak them true,
Remember Hamma Hamma—
And they’ll smile and welcome you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

After the Red Sea, this should be easy

Thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Words just don’t mean what they used to

Thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Art from Ashes

Thanks to Ann M.

Posted in Advocacy, Art, History, Justice, Music, Religion, Remembrances | Leave a comment

Which Deity?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Good reason to get the COVID booster

Thanks to Ed M.

The Washington Post reported that Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, director of the National Institutes of Health and former acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, delayed the publication of a study in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report showing the COVID-19 vaccine significantly reduced the chances of hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits last season.

The report was to be published on March 19. According to anonymous sources, Bhattacharya had issues with the methodology, but sources told the newspaper the methodology is the same one used to assess the efficacy of flu vaccines. According to the unpublished report, which was shared with the Post, from September to December last year, people who had received an updated seasonal COVID vaccine reduced their likelihood of ED and urgent care visits by 50% and the likelihood of COVID-associated hospitalizations by 55%

Posted in Health | Leave a comment

Trump’s post

Thanks to Mike Ca.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A minute after posting the image of himself as Jesus, Trump posted an image of a Trump tower on the moon

Commentary by Heather Cox Richardson

By the end of 2024, inflation in the U.S., which had soared in the aftermath of the Covid-19 lockdowns, was almost back to the Federal Reserve’s goal of 2%. Even so, during the 2024 presidential campaign, candidate Donald Trump promised he would bring prices down on Day One, beginning with energy prices, thanks to new high tariffs, business deregulation, and tax cuts.

It was a year ago today, just ten days after President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcement, that Trump’s senior counselor for trade and manufacturing Peter Navarro told the Fox News Channel that “90 [trade] deals in 90 days is possible. The boss is going to be the chief negotiator. Nothing’s done without him looking very carefully at it—he has such a fine attention to detail.”

Trump’s “Liberation Day” tore up the free trade principles on which leaders after World War II based the international order that promoted stability and prosperity. In their place, Trump first declared an emergency to take the power to manage tariffs away from Congress, then used that power to elicit favorable treatment for his own businesses or bribes from those who needed the tariffs on their products lowered.

The Supreme Court declared those tariffs unconstitutional on February 20, and later that day Trump claimed the right to impose tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which authorizes tariffs to address “large and serious balance-of-payments deficits.” Trump was the first to use this law, and his use of it has already been challenged.

In the meantime, the administration has not begun the process of refunding the approximately $175 billion owed to the importers who paid the illegal tariffs, but says it will begin that process on April 20. Democrats have introduced bills to refund the costs of the tariffs passed on to consumers. The money from illegal tariffs is accumulating about $23 million a day in interest, to be paid for by taxpayers.

In mid-March, Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell noted that inflation was rising. He explained that “some big chunk of that, between a half and three-quarters ​is actually tariffs, so we’re looking for progress on that” once Trump’s tariffs move through the system.

Statistics released by the Labor Department on Friday showed that Trump’s war with Iran has pushed inflation to 3.3%. That’s the fastest rate of growth in almost two years, tripling the 0.3% rate in February, when inflation was 2.4%. Gasoline prices rose 21.2%, a record.

Economist Heather Long told Alicia Wallace of CNN: “It’s going to get a lot worse before there’s any relief. Even if the war on Iran ends in two weeks, and there’s magically an agreement, inflation will continue to rise for months to come.” She continued: “We haven’t seen it come through with food yet, in airfares—those are clearly going to go higher—and in transit costs. It’s just a matter of time.” She added: “We almost forget the tariffs, because we’re all paying attention to the gas, but it’s a good reminder that part of the issue here is we’re piling on top of what was already rising.”

Those energy costs are going to continue to skyrocket until the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of the world’s oil is transported, reopens for traffic. After strikes from both the U.S. and Israel costing the lives of 13 U.S. service members and countless Iranian and Lebanese civilians, and more than $1 billion a day, Iran has closed the strait for all but a few vessels from favored nations. In negotiating to reopen the strait, the U.S. is demanding terms that are significantly weaker than the ones Iran agreed to in 2015 during negotiation with the Barack Obama administration.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, together with Germany and the European Union—took 20 months to hash out. The agreement constrained Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for a relaxation of sanctions that would let Iran recover about $100 billion of assets frozen in overseas banks.

Yesterday Vice President J.D. Vance, Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, and Trump’s special envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff were in Islamabad, Pakistan, to negotiate with Iran. According to Vance, their goal was to get Iran to stop its quest for a nuclear weapon, although both Kushner and Witkoff have deep financial ties to the Middle East and have been openly courting investments there during negotiations. And yet these leaders of the U.S. delegation, who have no experience in diplomacy, announced after only 21 hours that they could not reach an agreement and were leaving.

At just about the same moment Vance, Kushner, and Witkoff left the negotiations, Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were watching an Ultimate Fighting Championship match in Miami. Earlier, Trump had said to reporters that he didn’t care if the team in Islamabad reached an agreement. “We win, regardless,” he said. “We’ve defeated them militarily.” The fact that the president had the U.S. secretary of state with him at a UFC event while talks were breaking down in Islamabad showed Trump’s disdain for the State Department, as well as his attempt to play Vance and Rubio off against each other as each vies for Trump’s endorsement as the inheritor of MAGA.

Today Trump announced that the U.S. military will blockade the Strait of Hormuz, sending the price of oil surging.

It is unclear what the president hopes to accomplish by blockading the strait. He told Maria Bartiromo of the Fox News Channel his new policy is “called ‘all in and all out.’ There’ll be a time when we’ll have ’em all come in, and all come out, but it won’t be a percentage. It won’t be a friend of yours, like, a country that’s your ally or a country that’s your friend; it’s all or nothing. And that’ll be, uh, that won’t be in too long a distance. No, we’re, uh, just bringing the ships up. We got a lot of ships, so we’re bringing them up. We think that numerous countries are gonna be helping us with this also, but we’re putting on a complete blockade. We’re not gonna let Iran make money on selling oil to people that they like and not people that they don’t like, or whatever it is. It’s gonna be all or none, and that’s the way it is, and it’ll be, you saw what we did with Venezuela. It’ll be something very similar to that, but at a higher level.”

U.S. Central Command, overseeing the U.S. military operation in Iran, announced today that it would “begin implementing a blockade of all maritime traffic entering and exiting Iranian ports on April 13…in accordance with the President’s proclamation.”

Trump’s promise to voters that he would lower prices, along with his crusade against immigrants, attacks on education and the courts, and vow to resurrect a patriarchy in which white Christian men would dominate women and people of color, was closely patterned on the “illiberal democracy” of Viktor Orbán in Hungary. MAGA Republicans embraced Orbán as the leader of a movement to replace democracy with an authoritarianism that empowered the far right.

MAGA Republicans invited Orbán to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference, and media figure Tucker Carlson interviewed him in Hungary. His destruction of democracy in Hungary provided the blueprint for Project 2025, with Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts building close ties to Orbán’s institutions.

But Orbán’s vows to reinstate traditional values in Hungary produced higher prices and profound corruption. His corruption as well as his evident attempts to make Hungary subordinate to Russia’s president Vladimir Putin infuriated Hungarians, whose hatred for Russia runs deep, especially after that affinity was recently revealed to be actual promises to be “at your service” “in any matter where I can be of assistance.”

Although Orbán’s political party has skewed governance in Hungary to make it hard for him to lose at the polls, as well as censoring the media, Hungarians turned out today in record numbers—77% of registered voters—and gave Orbán’s opposition party more than two thirds of the seats in the parliament, a supermajority that will let the opposition undo some of the changes Orbán’s party made to cement their power. Orbán’s defeat means that the parliament will name opposition leader Péter Magyar, a former Orbán loyalist, as prime minister.

“We have done it,” Magyar told a crowd after Orbán conceded. “We have liberated Hungary and have taken back our country.” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen posted on social media: “Hungary has chosen Europe. Europe has always chosen Hungary. A country reclaims its European path. The Union grows stronger.”

Along with other right-wing leaders, both Trump and Vance had worked for Orbán’s victory in the election, with Vance actually traveling to Hungary to urge voters to turn out for Orbán’s party. Orbán’s defeat is a major blow to the MAGA belief that the right-wing forces opposing liberal democracy are the vanguard of an unstoppable movement blessed by God.

Trump responded to Orbán’s defeat with a long screed attacking Pope Leo XIV, who has spoken out against the religious justification for wars, a statement widely interpreted as commentary on the Trump administration’s claim that the war in Iran is a holy war. “God does not bless any conflict,” the Pope posted on Friday. “Anyone who is a disciple of Christ, the Prince of Peace, is never on the side of those who once wielded the sword and today drop bombs.”

Trump tonight posted on social media, in part: “I don’t want a Pope who criticizes the President of the United States because I’m doing exactly what I was elected, IN A LANDSLIDE, to do, setting Record Low Numbers in Crime, and creating the Greatest Stock Market in History.” Trump suggested the Pope was elevated to the papacy only “because he was an American, and they thought that would be the best way to deal with President Donald J. Trump. If I wasn’t in the White House, Leo wouldn’t be in the Vatican.” He wrote “Leo should get his act together as Pope, use Common Sense, stop catering to the Radical Left, and focus on being a Great Pope, not a Politician.”

Today is Orthodox Easter, and about 45 minutes after attacking the Pope, Trump posted an image of himself in the place of Jesus, apparently healing a sick man in a bed, surrounded by a soldier, a nurse, a woman praying, and an older man. Behind him are the Statue of Liberty, the Lincoln Memorial, and a giant American flag, while in the sky are two eagles, three fighter jets, soldiers, and what seems to be a monster.

Amid popular revulsion at what people are calling heresy and blasphemy, former U.S. representative Marjorie Taylor Greene wrote: “It’s more than blasphemy. It’s an Antichrist spirit.”

A minute after posting the image of himself as Jesus, Trump posted an image of a Trump tower on the moon.

Posted in Economics, Government, Mental Health, War | Leave a comment

When you’re not sure!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Line dancers at Skyline!

This is from 2017 at Skyline. Can we have a performing group of line dancers once more? Hope so!

Posted in Dance | Leave a comment

Where Mail Voting Began, Worries Spread Over Trump’s Attacks

In the Pacific Northwest, mail-in ballots have been the norm for decades, but President Trump’s war on such voting has turned a point of regional pride into another partisan battle line.

Election workers in blue rubber gloves sort through a pile of ballots on a table.
Ballot processing at King County election headquarters in Renton, Wash., in 2020.Credit…Ruth Fremson/The New York Times

By Anna Griffin in the NYTT

The American system of voting by mail can, like flannel and grunge rock, trace its roots to the 1990s Pacific Northwest, where Washington and Oregon moved to adopt mail-in balloting as the statewide default, driven in part by Republicans hoping to improve turnout among rural populations.

But like so much in contemporary politics, what was once bipartisan has broken down into familiar battle lines, as President Trump declares war on voting by mail. Now, even where mail-in balloting has become as much a part of the culture as artisan coffee and eschewing umbrellas, officials are worried that a three-decade-old tradition is already fraying under pressure from the president, his government and his followers.

“They’re undermining trust, even here where voters understand the system so well,” said Stuart Holmes, who oversees Washington’s elections.

Last August, Mr. Trump promised an executive order written “by the best lawyers in the country” to end all mail-in ballots. Last month, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority appeared poised to curtail at-home voting by rejecting a Mississippi law that allows ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they are received within five business days after the election. Oregon and Washington could both have to change their election schedules, and they’re already warning voters to mail ballots earlier this year because of U.S. Postal Service cuts.

Late last month, Mr. Trump voted by mail in a special election in Florida, and then declared, “Mail-in voting means mail-in cheating.” Then, last week, the president issued a new executive order directing federal agencies to scrutinize state election practices and consider withholding funding from states that do not comply.

The president’s attacks have local ripples: Ben Edtl, a Republican activist and consultant in Oregon, said he has gathered 85,000 signatures for a proposed November ballot measure to kill mail voting in the first state to adopt it statewide. He blames it for Democratic dominance.

So far, such efforts have stalled, largely because the system is so popular and Republicans are outnumbered by Democrats and independents. Repeal bills died in the Washington legislature this year, and a similar proposal in Oregon last year drew so many comments, almost 10,000 and mostly negative, that the state legislature’s website froze.

Mr. Edtl’s effort is just halfway to the 160,000 signatures needed by July 2 to make the fall ballot.

The irony is that Republicans initially seemed like the biggest beneficiaries of voting by mail — and were its earliest boosters.

“Oh, it was intensely partisan in the beginning,” said Phil Keisling, Oregon’s secretary of state in the 1990s. “Democrats hated it.”

Oregon’s first mailed elections were the brainchild of a rural county clerk who wondered whether local election officials, already required to send sample ballots to voters, could just ship them the real thing instead. Early experiments in the 1980s focused on minor local races like school levies, where mailed ballots increased turnout and led to a series of defeats for funding measures as the pool of voters expanded beyond education advocates.

The Republican-led state legislature approved taking the “Oregon experiment” statewide in 1994, but the Democratic governor vetoed it. (continued on Page 2 or here)

Posted in Government, Voting | Leave a comment

The beauty and wonder of awe

Thanks to Bob P.

She grew up in Florida, saw snow for the first time during a work trip… and turned it into a moment (click to see video) no one will forget.

Woman excitedly receives morning coffee, breakfast sandwich in gray loungewear; reacts to heavy snow outdoors

Posted in environment, happiness, Nature | Leave a comment