Sent in by Tom Gibbs from the Seattle Times: “INITIATIVE 123 is not worthy of your vote on Aug. 2. It requires the city to pay for a new, expensive, elevated viaduct that has no plan, cost estimate or new funding to pay for it.
The backers of I-123 are attempting to associate this initiative with the 15-year-long public effort to re-envision Seattle’s waterfront as a pedestrian-oriented linear park. I-123 would actually make that vision impossible to achieve. The campaign is hoping to manufacture credibility. Don’t be fooled.” Click here for the full Op-ed piece in the Seattle Times.