Thanks to Mike C.

Buzzing traffic at the nearby Convention Center
Ed note: If you haven’t yet joined WACCRA (Washington Association of Continuing Care Retirement Communities), please consider doing so. This organization advocates for rights and protections for those of us residing in CCRCs–a relatively new concept that is just beginning to be understood by state legislators.
| April 15, 2022 Hello WACCRA Members, A few months ago, we sent out a News-Mail that listed and described Bills before the Washington State Legislature that we, your WACCRA Board, supported. We encouraged you to reach out to your Legislators with comments. To provide closure, we will have an update for you on the fate of those Bills in our next News-Mail. With this News-Mail, we want to inform you of a budgetary appropriation, signed by Gov. Inslee, that affects our homes: registered CCRCs in our state. This Office of Insurance Commissioner (OIC) Budget Appropriation allows the commissioner to begin gathering information to inform recommendations that would lead to heightened consumer protections for CCRC residents. Here is the exact wording: “$250,000 of the insurance commissioner’s regulatory account – state appropriation is provided solely for the commissioner to contract for an assessment of federal and state laws and regulations to provide recommendations on creating a legal framework with which continuing care retirement community products under chapter 18.390 RCW may achieve heightened consumer protections through shared regulatory oversight by the office of the insurance commissioner. The commissioner must submit a report on the assessment and recommendations to the health care committees of the legislature by December 1, 2022.” See Text on page 182, line 16 of the CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT, ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5693. Passed by the Senate March 10, 2022. This initiative by the OIC will allow residents, management and the OIC to focus together on long-term finances and insure each CCRC remains viable. With their expertise, the OIC will provide management a means of fostering greater excellence in financial planning for CCRCs. Your WACCRA Board members support the OIC in their decision to carry out this work, and we look forward to seeing the assessment and recommendations that come from it later this year. WACCRA is deeply committed to working toward making sure that residents’ financial and health care security are sound. Currently, we face a lack of guarantees on the long-term financial sustainability of our CCRCs. We see this work by the OIC as a step toward gaining some sort of guarantee. Why the Office of Insurance Commissioner? CCRC contracts are analogous to unfunded and unregulated insurance policies. Heightened consumer protections for Independent-Living residents in CCRCs, through the Office of Insurance Commissioner (or equivalent), is not a unique idea. Bankruptcies and financial failures of CCRCs have motivated other states to regulate CCRCs significantly beyond Washington’s current regulatory requirement. In fact, 19 states currently have Insurance oversight for CCRC residents. CCRCs in WA currently have no such protective oversight. We want our CCRCs and the lifestyle they provide to be a successful model: financially stable. Not just for us – current residents – but for future residents and the industry as a whole going forward. We want to assure our friends who are thinking of making this important investment that it is, indeed, a sound long-term investment. And, we want to be able to point to the data to back up our statement. We will monitor progress on this work as the year progresses, and will keep you informed along the way. As always – Thank you for your continued support of WACCRA! Monica Clement WACCRA Communications Chair |
Ed Note: Ed and Linda recently moved to the Olympic Tower. The reflections on downsizing will touch us all. I hope others will share their experiences.
Edgar K Marcuse MD, MPH, FPIDS
When does middle age end? Damned if I know, but in my 80th year it was at last undeniable that I was now truly old, mature, elderly – you pick. Sporadic email brought unwelcome news of colleagues and friends ills and sometimes deaths. My older brother was struggling with Parkinson’s, my sister-in-law with blindness. Thanks to good fortune, genes, a stable marriage, amazing drugs, and surgeries to replace failing parts my spouse and I were far better than OK, but the handwriting on the wall was much too vivid to ignore: the decade ahead would inevitably bring some hefty challenges.
Two decades earlier, accepting the facts that I was an incorrigible workaholic; that the rewards of my spouse’s job had diminished and there other paths we wanted to explore, we moved from our Seattle urban home of 35 years near my hospital and university to a semi-rural house on 6 acres overlooking Puget Sound’s shipping lanes. We wanted to experience the seasons, be exposed to wildlife, to garden, to fish, tend the land, walk in the woods and on the beaches and travel. And we did. I gave up my clinical work at age 65, but continued in an administrative role (QI) until age 74. For almost 20 years we lived among the eagles, osprey, woodpeckers, deer, occasional bear and river otter.
We thought of ourselves as living in a very special weekend bed and breakfast, with the weekend never ending! The work-mowing, planting, pruning, mulching, weeding, hauling gravel, bark, firewood, chain sawing, raking – was rewarding and physically invigorating. Slowly some burdens emerged: we were cautioned about climbing ladder and trees; tasks took longer; what had been invigorating was at times physically challenging, and our splendid isolation was becoming a concern — few neighbors, no public transportation, major medical centers a ferry ride away. So, after 3 years of deliberation, we choose to move into a continuing care retirement community in downtown Seattle.
Despite seminars on downsizing and moving I did not recognize the enormity of this undertaking nor, more importantly, its emotional toll. Now, 3 months post move -in, I want to share some reflections. On our journey we physicians have many mentors as we climb our profession’s mountain, but few once we summit: ascending is a team sport, descending too often a solo journey, so sharing our stories seems worthwhile.
Why was the emotional toll so great? I think in large part because I focused only on the endings and losses; had no appreciation of the new beginnings or the gains; and because I struggled to
maintain control of uncontrollable factors. Thus, I fear I made my travel on the road to downsizing and moving steeper and bumpier than it had to be.
Moving to a retirement community in downtown Seattle has already yielded many rewards.
Many burdens have been lifted: forecasts of gale force winds no longer mean gathering a truck load of downed limbs, chain sawing and hauling the big ones away; forecasts of heavy rains no longer prompt worries of a landslide of our bank into Puget Sound. Our social life has become sufficiently complex that my spouse and I have had to master coordinating electronic calendars to coordinate multiple dinners with new friends; community lectures, concerts and ready access to downtown museums and performing arts – theater, symphony, opera. The meals which may be taken in restaurant or as take out are varied, always good and often excellent; the exercise facilities too convenient to permit credible excuses, and home maintenance is the staff’s responsibility.
The losses were many: books, photos, heirlooms, furniture, rugs., clothes, even house plants that filled the stage on which we lived our lives. Gifting some items to friends and neighbors helped to mitigate these losses, but the countless trips to Goodwill and thrift shop were a bizarre mixture of sadness at the loss and relief that one more box on the to do list had been checked off.
The sale of our home proceeded as anticipated, but inevitably there unexpected hurdles such as the county’s requirement we recertify our well, the buyer’s offer dependent on an early move in date, having to make a major unneeded repair to comply with a house inspector’s finding. And there were glitches in the move in process: items temporarily lost by movers, delays in needed deliveries. All this became a litany of 2 to 4 AM ruminations reflecting my obsessive compulsive traits that served me better during my career than in retirement and my unwillingness to accept that this was part and parcel of process that would run its course despite my Herculean but foolhardy efforts manage it.
Now 8 weeks past move in we are truly confident in our decision to make this transition at this time in our lives when it was elective and we could share the countless choices and tasks. Our new opportunities hold great promise. Maybe in my dotage I can gain serenity to recognize and accept the things I cannot change and to anticipate unimagined rewards lie ahead.
Thanks to Sybil-Ann
Thanks to Mike C. for sending this in
Erick Schonfeld@erickschonfeld / 8:12 AM PDT•June 23, 2009 Comment
In an announcement today at Ford’s research center in Dearborn, Michigan, the U.S. Secretary of Energy will be giving details about the first loans to come out of the government’s $25 billion program to help auto manufacturers. Ford got a $5.9 billion loan, but Tesla Motors, Silicon Valley’s electric car manufacturer, is receiving $465 million from the program. The money will go towards completing the development of its Modern S sedan and its electric power trains, which are being licensed by other car makers such as Mercedes. Last month, Mercedes’ parent company Daimler also invested $50 million for a 10 percent stake in Tesla. That brought the total debt and equity invested in the company to more than $200 million. Now, with the government loan, that brings the total capital raised to $700 million.
If the government is going to be giving out loans to help car makers produce more fuel-efficient vehicles, it is good to see some of that money trickle down to helping electric cars get off the drawing table and into driveways. Tesla plans to use $365 million of the loan to accelerate the production of its Model S sedan, and the remaining $100 million for its electric power train manufacturing plant in California, for which its is in the final stages of negotiating a lease.
At the tail-end of a long blog post yesterday responding to allegations in a lawsuit by Tesla co-founder Martin Eberhard, Tesla CEO Elon Musk reveals that the company is on track to hit profitability next month as it ramps up production of its all-electric Roadster sports car. He also writes that the company has received more than 1,000 pre-orders for the Model S sedan, up from 500 in the first week. At about $50,000 after a tax credit, the Model S will be about half the price of the Roadster. In the post, he explains how the Roadster made possible the sedan:https://jac.yahoosandbox.com/1.0.1/safeframe.html
Tesla is sometimes criticized for the fact that our first car is relatively expensive, implying we thought there was a shortage of sports cars for rich people! Obviously, the transition to electric cars can only occur if they are affordable. However, a low volume and fairly costly product like the Roadster is the only realistic initial option for a small startup trying to create breakthrough technology. New technology in any field takes a few versions to optimize before reaching the mass market and in this case it is competing with 150 years and trillions of dollars spent on gasoline cars.
I want to be clear, though, that we are trying to get there as soon as possible. My main reason for putting so much time and money into helping create Tesla is to speed up the transition to electric cars. This was not a case of rank ordering likely return on investment and concluding that the auto industry was the easiest way to make money! While I’m confident that Tesla will turn out to have a good return for investors, building a car company has to be one of the hardest ways to make a buck.
That $465 million loan should help.CrunchBase InformationTesla MotorsInformation provided by CrunchBase
| 3k views | 2k visitors | 11 comments |
I’d like to thank everyone who views and comments on the Skyline725 blog. Some refer to it as my blog, but it is really your blog. Hopefully it helps to connect us with ideas, information and humor which help to keep us interconnected. The blog is purposefully not a complaint forum–we have a committee structure to handle internal issues.
Please send me your ideas for improvement–what you would like to see or not. If you want to become an author on the blog, I can easily train you to post directly to the blog yourselves. I monitor all posts and comments and we’ve avoided spam or hacking to date. Many people send me items to post and, as an editor, I must pick and choose–trying to avoid posting too much. The politics of some of the posts and humor learns toward the left, but we’re certainly willing to hear all sides of issues.
Respectfully,
Jim deMaine, editor
Katherine Graubard, Facilitator
Rick Baugh, Minutes
Report on Past events:
| DATE/TIME | EVENT | Recording |
| Mar. 23, Wed, 3:00 p.m. | Judge Cecily Hazelrigg, Division 1, Position 5, Washington State Court of Appeals – Jim Sanders or Patricia Kiaser reporting | No |
Description of Coming events:
| DATE/TIME | EVENT | Place |
| April 21, Thurs – 7:30 p.m. | Tim Burgess, Mayor’s Office – Director of Strategic Initiatives – Briefing by Jim Sanders | Mt. B & Zoom & 370 |
| May 20, Fri – 4:00 p.m. | CEG Meeting | Mt. B & Zoom |
Discussion on Future Activities
Ideas on topics and speakers:
Other Reports of Civic Activities
First Hill Improvement Association – Bob Terrell – Purchase of 9th Ave land across from Skyline
Individuals Involved in Civic Activities
Interview of Doug Clark: His years of involvement with Museum of Flight.
Next CEG Meeting (3rd Fridays)
Fri., May 20, 2022 at 4:00 Mt. Baker, (If there are items on the agenda)
CEG Coordinators
Rick Baugh
Katherine Graubard

By Gretchen Reynolds in the NYT.
For anyone interested in the relationship between exercise and living longer, one of the most pressing questions is how much we really need to stay healthy. Is 30 minutes a day enough? Can we get by with less? Do we have to exercise all in one session, or can we spread it throughout the day? And when we’re talking about exercise, does it have to be hard to count?
For years, exercise scientists tried to quantify the ideal “dose” of exercise for most people. They finally reached a broad consensus in 2008 with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, which were updated in 2018 after an extensive review of the available science about movement, sitting and health. In both versions, the guidelines advised anyone who was physically able to accumulate 150 minutes of moderate exercise every week, and half as much if it is intense.
But what’s the best way to space out those weekly minutes? And what does “moderate” mean? Here’s what some of the leading researchers in exercise science had to say about step counts, stairwells, weekend warriors, greater longevity and why the healthiest step we can take is the one that gets us off the couch.
“For longevity, 150 minutes a week of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity clearly is enough,” said Dr. I-Min Lee, a professor of epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. She has extensively studied movement and health and helped draft the current national physical activity guidelines.
For practical purposes, exercise scientists often recommend breaking that 150 minutes into 30-minute sessions of speedy walking or a similar activity five times a week. “It is quite clear from numerous large-scale, well-conducted epidemiological studies that 30 minutes of moderate-intensity activity most days lowers the risk of premature death and many diseases, such as stroke, heart attack, Type 2 diabetes and many types of cancer,” said Ulf Ekelund, a professor specializing in physical activity epidemiology at the Norwegian School of Sports Sciences in Oslo, who has led many of those studies.
Moderate exercise, he continued, means “activities that increase your breathing and heart rate, so the exertion feels like a five or six on a scale between one and 10.” In other words, pick up the pace a bit if your inclination is to stroll, but do not feel compelled to sprint.
Thanks to Jeff E.
Thanks to Pam P.
By Pranshu Verma in the Washington Post
A public library damaged by shelling in Chernihiv, Ukraine. (Olga Korotkova/AP)
The site held a number of things: Lord Byron poems written about Mazepa’s life and a catalogue of centuries-old articles detailing his various conquests. Pirmann opened her website scraping tool, backing up the site and preserving its content.
Now, the original website is lost, its server space likely gone to cyberattacks, power outages or Russian shelling. But thanks to her, it still remains intact on server space rented by an international group of librarians and archivists.
“We’re trying to save as much as possible,” Pirmann said. “Otherwise, we lose that connection to the past.”
Buildings, bridges, and monuments aren’t the only cultural landmarks vulnerable to war. With the violence well into its second month, the country’s digital history — its poems, archives, and pictures — are at risk of being erased as cyberattacks and bombs erode the nation’s servers.
Over the past month, a motley group of more than 1,300 librarians, historians, teachers and young children have banded together to save Ukraine’s Internet archives, using technology to back up everything from census data to children’s poems and Ukrainian basket weaving techniques.
Thanks to Paul T.
Thanks to Ed M.
SEATTLE | Museum House (707 Terry Ave) | Two towers | 32 Stories | 330 ft | 100 m | Page 21 | SkyscraperCity Forum has many good photos and blog comments.

Thanks to Ann M. so alerting us. So sad. Click here for the story.
Thanks to Al MacR.
To schedule your second booster, please call 844.520.8700.
Appointments are available at UW Medical Center – Montlake, UW Medical Center – Northwest, Harborview Medical Center, Valley Medical Center, and UW Medicine primary care clinics. We also continue to provide first and second vaccine doses as well as initial boosters for all eligible individuals at these locations.
Please note that for adolescents ages 12 to 17 only the Pfizer vaccine can be used. Children ages 5 to 11 are not currently eligible to receive a booster.
For more information about boosters, visit UW Medicine COVID-19 Updates & Information. If you have questions about whether a booster is appropriate for you, please contact your provider.
Thanks to Mary M. for finding this article. The neighborhood is facing yet another very large building! 🙁

Westbank will purchase the building which contains St. James’ pastoral outreach center at 907 Columbia as well as the archdiocesan chancery around the corner at 710 9th Avenue. The Archdiocese will find new digs to consolidate its 125 employees, the site yet to be determined. In turn, St. James will purchase from the Archdiocese two floors of Cathedral Place plus the old chancery building at 907 Terry Avenue, one of the city’s most familiar protest sites.
Westbank will build up to 1,300 “residential homes,” with the exact mix of apartments and condominiums yet to be determined. Click here for the full article.
Thanks to Pam P. – from the Goodnewsletter
Only two years ago, the border town of Laredo, Texas, was bracing itself for the construction of the towering steel and concrete border wall that threatened to cut off the city, its people, and the environment from its main water source — the Rio Grande River.
Diligent grassroots efforts by No Border Wall Coalition (NBWC) — a coalition composed of veterans, clergy, teachers, students, Indigenous leaders, and landowners — paved the way for the cancellation of unconstructed border wall contracts.
According to environmental nonprofit Earthjustice, this saved 71 miles of sensitive riverfront land and more than $1 billion in taxpayer funds.

This victory allowed the City of Laredo to propose and unanimously green-light plans for a binational river park — which is set to be developed where the border wall was once proposed to stand.
Ambassadors to the U.S. and Mexico, along with city officials from Laredo, and Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas — affectionately called the “Sister Cities” — are working together to transform their shared river into an ecological restoration project.
This historic binational project will span approximately 6.3 miles and focus on strengthening the conservation of the Rio Grande River while creating a community recreation and education space that stands to represent the unique and interconnected relationship between these two border cities.
As of February 2022, Laredo City Council and members of the Binational Working Group — a public-private consortium — formally announced that San Antonio-based architecture and urban design firm Overland Partners will be working alongside local partner Able City to create conceptual design plans for the first phase of the ecological restoration project.
“We are inspired by the Binational River Park and excited by the unique challenges an aspirational project of this magnitude presents – environmentally, socially, and culturally,” Rick Archer, senior principal and CEO at Overland Partners told The Architect’s Newspaper.
“Together with our partners and stakeholders, we want to create an international cultural destination and model for cooperation, conservation, and community.”
According to architecture, interiors, and design magazine Dezeen, the park will be made up of three areas: a 2.5-mile-long ecological restoration area northeast of the cities, a mile stretch in the urban cores along the river that will be framed by bridges and feature an amphitheater, and lastly, a recreation area that is proposed to stretch for three miles and lead pedestrians to the Nuevo Laredo Zoo.
Although this project is currently in its early stages, its envisioned to be comparable to San Antonio’s famed River Walk.
Thanks to Ed M.
Ed note: Second booster shots are now available in many pharmacies. Most recommend calling or going on their web site to make an appointment.