Thanks to Yvonne P.

Wednesday, May 5th from 6 to 7 pm.
The guests are Bob Donegan and Brian Surratt. Donegan is President of Ivar’s restaurants. Surratt is Vice-President for real estate investments and community relations for Alexandria Real Estate; the firm’s focus is on facilities for the life-sciences industry. The speakers will focus on “their vision to ensure downtown shifts from surviving to thriving.” Donegan is a volunteer at the Seattle Aquarium, Boy Scouts, and other local civic organizations. Surratt is the former director of the Seattle Department of Economic Development and a board member at FareStart, the Downtown Emergency Services Center, and several other organizations.
Registration costs $5 and is done online at http://www.townhallseattle.org | Calendar.
(Note: Town Hall now asks everyone to create an account at http://my.townhallseattle.org in order to purchase tickets. Once registered, returning to the website to buy tickets for future events is more straightforward. It is also possible to get tickets by calling (206) 504-2857.)
Ed note: Have you “herd” this? Perhaps in our restricted community of fully vaccinated people, it’s time to start lightening up a bit. A great place to start would be to remove the now unneeded barriers on our dining room tables!
Why do so many vaccinated people remain fearful? Listen to the professor’s story.
Guido Calabresi, a federal judge and Yale law professor, invented a little fable that he has been telling law students for more than three decades.
He tells the students to imagine a god coming forth to offer society a wondrous invention that would improve everyday life in almost every way. It would allow people to spend more time with friends and family, see new places and do jobs they otherwise could not do. But it would also come with a high cost. In exchange for bestowing this invention on society, the god would choose 1,000 young men and women and strike them dead.
Calabresi then asks: Would you take the deal? Almost invariably, the students say no. The professor then delivers the fable’s lesson: “What’s the difference between this and the automobile?”
In truth, automobiles kill many more than 1,000 young Americans each year; the total U.S. death toll hovers at about 40,000 annually. We accept this toll, almost unthinkingly, because vehicle crashes have always been part of our lives. We can’t fathom a world without them.
It’s a classic example of human irrationality about risk. We often underestimate large, chronic dangers, like car crashes or chemical pollution, and fixate on tiny but salient risks, like plane crashes or shark attacks.
One way for a risk to become salient is for it to be new. That’s a core idea behind Calabresi’s fable. He asks students to consider whether they would accept the cost of vehicle travel if it did not already exist. That they say no underscores the very different ways we treat new risks and enduring ones.
I have been thinking about the fable recently because of Covid-19. Covid certainly presents a salient risk: It’s a global pandemic that has upended daily life for more than a year. It has changed how we live, where we work, even what we wear on our faces. Covid feels ubiquitous.
Fortunately, it is also curable. The vaccines have nearly eliminated death, hospitalization and other serious Covid illness among people who have received shots. The vaccines have also radically reduced the chances that people contract even a mild version of Covid or can pass it on to others.
Yet many vaccinated people continue to obsess over the risks from Covid — because they are so new and salient.
Thanks to Paul T.
Even though this looks like snow… it is a CLOUD.
An amazing phenomenon recently captured on video.
A “cloud avalanche” occurred near the Kapuche Glacier Lake in the mountains of Nepal, March 2021. That scene is extremely rare, it’s lucky enough to see it once in a lifetime.
At that time, a group of travel companions were camping by the lake, and they took the risk of taking pictures of this rare visual feast.
The white snow clouds rushed down the valley, unstoppable, instantly swallowing the mountains and hitting the lake surface. Against the backdrop of the blue sky and the yellow-brown mountains, they were more distinct, magnificent and shocking.
The strong air flow overturned the tents and sleeping bags, frightening the travelers, but fortunately no casualties were reported. After that, a small rainbow appeared by the lake, which was extremely beautiful, and the travelers all cheered and marveled at it.
Call it “perfect cloud collapse”.
The following in the introduction to my book, released by Clyde Hill Publishing in September 2020. If interested, I have a few copies available at a discount. Otherwise the book can be found on Amazon and at your favorite book store. Jim deMaine
For thirty-eight years I cared for very sick, terminally ill patients. Their stories—their deaths and suffering—have become part of me. I have collected and treasured the many kind notes that patients and families have sent me, at times crediting me with powers I do not deserve. As I ministered to patients, their loved ones and caregivers, I was part doctor, part teacher, and part spiritual advisor. In a care conference in the ICU, I would often tell a story to help a family understand the crisis their loved one was enduring. I tend to think in stories and found that, through them, families could more easily grasp whatever lesson I was trying to impart. They, like most of us, had not talked much about death and were unprepared for it. But when death lands on our doorstep, do we lock the door or welcome it in? Dying is different for each of us as we enter the unknowable on our own unique path.
Sometimes we negotiate. Larry surprised me during a visit to my pulmonary clinic. “Doc, I want to take you out to lunch. There’s something I want to discuss with you.”
I was a little nervous about the invitation. Larry was a favorite patient of mine, coming across as a bit crusty but a straight shooter. I’d grown to know him well and we often chatted about his former career in sales. I was a bit concerned that he might try to sell me something—and in a way, he did.
We arranged to meet at a restaurant near the hospital, and after some pleasantries, Larry let me know that he wanted to talk about dying.
“Look, I’ve lived a long time and what I’m doing now isn’t really living,” he said. “These flare-ups are torture. I feel like a fish out of water and I don’t want to die that way. My biggest fear is suffocating to death. Doc, I want you to help me at the end.”
Larry was suffering from severe COPD, and his condition was getting worse. He had a piercing gaze that twinkled when he cracked one of his frequent jokes, and he always appeared well groomed. But he breathed noisily and had a dusky color, even with the oxygen flowing through his nasal prongs. Larry was not joking now. He’d just been discharged from the hospital after another crisis, with severe wheezing, gasping and coughing due to infection. His waterfront home, where he lived alone at age seventy-seven, had become a prison to him.
“Doc, I can’t handle the stairs, go crabbing, or even lean over to dig clams. This is the pits.”
“How about hiring live-in help or moving to Seattle to be closer to your family and medical care?”
“No way,” Larry said. “I don’t want to move and bother my sons or have some stranger in my home!”
Larry’s COPD was near end stage. He had the classic findings of distended neck veins and a barrel-shaped chest. His lungs were over-expanded, and his diaphragms were moving poorly. There was a trace of swelling in his legs. His blood showed elevated carbon dioxide, and he couldn’t breathe well enough either to maintain oxygen or expel CO2. Chronic respiratory failure due to longstanding tobacco use was his diagnosis. He had finally kicked the habit five years earlier, which helped some, but not enough. Looking at him, I could see the side effects of prescribed steroids — the “moon face,” bruising of the arms, muscle wasting and weakness—all scourges of chronic use of prednisone.
We talked about ventilators to support his breathing and other kinds of ICU care. “No,” he said. Larry was clear; he wanted to be in control. “Look Doc, all I want you to do is promise me that you’ll help me at the end.”
Thanks to Donna D.
by Shira Ovide in the NYT
Today, let’s talk about relatively simple technology and a change in government policy that could unleash more innovation for Americans who have difficulty hearing.
I’ve been speaking with audiologists, consumer advocates and technology companies about what could be a revolution for our ears — hearing aids at a fraction of the cost and hassle of conventional devices.
Here’s how things stand now: Hearing loss is a pervasive and serious health problem, and many people are reluctant or can’t afford to get conventional hearing aids. Nearly 38 million American adults report some degree of hearing loss, but only a minority of people who could benefit from hearing aids have ever used them.
Hearing aids typically cost thousands of dollars, require multiple visits to specialists and often aren’t covered by health insurance. Untreated hearing loss is associated with cognitive decline, dementia and other harms. Overcoming barriers to hearing treatment may significantly improve Americans’ health.
The federal government is poised to help. Congress in 2017 passed legislation that would let anyone buy hearing aids approved by the Food and Drug Administration without a prescription from an audiologist. The F.D.A. has missed a deadline to release draft guidelines for this new category of over-the-counter hearing aids.
Experts told me that when the F.D.A. moves ahead, it’s likely to lead to new products and ideas to change hearing aids as we know them.
Imagine Apple, Bose or other consumer electronics companies making hearing aids more stylish and relatively affordable — with people having confidence that the devices had been vetted by the F.D.A. Bose told me that it’s working on over-the-counter hearing aid technology.
Barbara Kelley, executive director of the Hearing Loss Association of America, an advocacy organization, told me that she can’t wait for more affordable and accessible hearing help. “I’m really excited for the market to open up to see what we got and see how people are reacting,” she said.
It is already possible to buy a hearing helper — they can’t legally be called hearing aids — without a prescription. These devices, called personal sound amplification products or PSAPs, vary wildly in quality from excellent to junk. But when shopping for them, people often can’t tell the difference.
(The Wall Street Journal also recently wrote about hearing helper technologies, including earbuds that can amplify quiet sounds. And Consumer Reports has a useful guide to hearing aids and PSAPs.)
Nicholas Reed, director of audiology at the Johns Hopkins Cochlear Center for Hearing and Public Health, told me that the F.D.A. process should provide a path for the best PSAPs to be approved as official over-the-counter hearing aids. He expects new companies to hit the market, too.
You may doubt that a gadget you buy next to the toilet paper at CVS could be a serious medical device. Dr. Reed’s research, however, has found that some hearing helpers for $350 or less were almost as good as prescription hearing aids for people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
Dr. Reed described the best lower-cost devices as the Hyundai of hearing help. (This was a compliment.) They aren’t flashy, but they will get many people safely and effectively where they need to go. He also imagines that the F.D.A. rules will create the conditions for many more people to buy hearing aids — both over the counter and by prescription.
Over-the-counter hearing aids won’t be able to help everyone, experts told me. And the traditional hearing aid industry has said that people are best served by customized devices with expert help.
There is also more technology brewing at the luxury end of the spectrum. A Silicon Valley start-up called Whisper has a novel monthly payment option for its hearing aids and says that its software “learns” over time based on an individual’s hearing deficits.
Health care in the United States can often feel as if it’s stuck, and technology is usually not the solution. But with hearing aids, technology and a change in government policy could bring helpful health innovation.
Thanks to the NYT
Thanks to Gordon G.
Thanks to Gordon G. Make sure to scroll down for pics.
Thanks to Donna D. Somebody had a bad day!
Thanks to Gordon G. (be sure to scroll down)
from the New Yorker by Howard Markel, a professor at the University of Michigan, is a member of the National Academy of Medicine and a Guggenheim Fellow.
Ed Note: Thomas Francis, Jr. is the father of one of our residents–Mary Jane!
On the morning of April 12, 1955, an epidemiologist named Thomas Francis, Jr., took the stage of the Rackham Auditorium, at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor. Short and portly, in his mid-fifties, with a long face and a close-clipped mustache, Francis was there to deliver a ninety-minute lecture on the vaccine field trial he had just completed. The trial had evaluated the efficacy of the poliovirus vaccine developed by Jonas Salk, a former postdoc in Francis’s lab.
An influenza researcher, Francis was known among scientists for his deft direction of complex flu-vaccine trials during the Second World War. He had taught Salk the techniques necessary for developing “killed virus” vaccines—shots in which large quantities of a virus are disabled in a formaldehyde solution, then introduced to the human immune system in order to prompt the production of antibodies. Today, no bioethics panel would allow Francis to run a safety trial for a vaccine developed by someone he knew so well. But rules were more relaxed back then—and, in any case, Francis’s reputation was so sterling that, as the Salk biographer Jane S. Smith has written, “even the most dedicated opponent of the new vaccine could never say a trial supervised by Francis was political, biased, or incomplete.”
Francis’s lecture was awaited breathlessly by the American public. Few diseases have inspired more fear than polio. During the first half of the twentieth century, summertime polio epidemics left wakes of paralysis and death behind them, forcing summer camps, movie theatres, and public pools to close. Newspapers regularly featured horrific images of children struggling to walk or breathe. Adults also suffered: after contracting the virus in 1921, when he was thirty-nine, Franklin D. Roosevelt was forced to use a wheelchair or leg braces for the rest of his life.
Thanks to Gordon G. (Keep scrolling, there’s 4 pages!)
By Jane E. Brody in the NYT
At a time when so many are dying against their will, it may seem out of sync to discuss the option of having a doctor help people end their lives when they face intolerable suffering that no treatment can relieve.
It’s less a question of uncontrollable physical pain, which prompts only a minority of requests for medical aid in dying, than it is a loss of autonomy, a loss of dignity, a loss of quality of life and an inability to engage in what makes people’s lives meaningful.
Intractable suffering is defined by patients, not doctors. Patients who choose medical aid in dying want to control when they die and die peacefully, remaining conscious almost to the very end, surrounded by loved ones and able to say goodbye.
Currently, nine states and the District of Columbia allow doctors to help patients who meet well-defined criteria and are on the threshold of dying choose when and how to end their lives. The laws are modeled after the first Death with Dignity Act, passed in Oregon in 1997.
A similar law has been introduced repeatedly, and again this January, in New York. Last year, Maryland came within one vote of joining states that permit medical aid in dying. Diane Rehm, the retired National Public Radio talk show host, says in a new film on the subject, “Each of us is just one bad death away from supporting these laws.”
Most people who seek medical aid in dying would prefer to live but have an illness that has in effect stripped their lives of meaning. Though often — and, proponents say, unfortunately — described as “assisted suicide,” the laws hardly give carte blanche for doctors to give people medication that would end their lives quickly and painlessly. The patient has to be terminally ill (usually with a life expectancy of less than six months), professionally certified as of sound mind, and able to self-administer the lethal medication without assistance. That can leave out people with advanced dementia or, in some cases, people with severe physical disabilities like those with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (A.L.S., or Lou Gehrig’s disease).
A desire to broaden access to medical aid in dying prompted Joe Fab, a director and writer, to create the film “When My Time Comes,” to air on public television starting April 8. (A free livestream of the film preview and discussion will be available on April 8, at 12:45 p.m. Eastern, at weta.org/WhenMyTimeComesFilm.) The film follows the 2020 publication of Ms. Rehm’s companion book of the same title, subtitled “Conversations About Whether Those Who Are Dying Should Have the Right to Determine When Life Should End.” Both the book and film were inspired by the protracted death in 2014 from Parkinson’s disease of John Rehm, her first husband, to whom she was married for 54 years.
As chair of the Senate Law & Justice Committee, I have been working closely over the last nine months with my counterpart chairs of the House Public Safety Committee and the House Civil Rights & Judiciary Committee on a package of bills to increase police accountability and combat systemic racism in policing. Nine of those bills have passed their chamber of origin and my committee has passed all five of the House bills:
E2SSB 5051 (strengthening the ability of the Criminal Justice Training Commission to discipline and remove officers who violate professional standards) — passed the Senate and the House; I am the prime sponsor of the bill
SSB 5066 (establishing for law enforcement a duty to intervene and a duty to report when they witness excessive force) — passed the Senate and the House
SSB 5259 (requiring collection of data about law enforcement use of force) — passed the Senate and the House
ESSB 5263 (removing the felony bar to lawsuits against police who kill or injure people) – passed the Senate and the House
SHB 1054 (banning police tactics such as chokeholds, no-knock warrants, and tear gas) — passed the House and the Senate
SHB 1088 (standardizing the process for impeachment disclosures of law enforcement officers) — passed the House and the Senate
E2SHB 1089 (permitting the state auditor to review deadly force investigations by local law enforcement) — passed the House and the Senate
ESHB 1267 (establishing a new state office to conduct investigations after a police use of deadly force) – passed the House and the Senate
E2SHB 1310 (establishing a statewide standard for use of force) – passed the House and the Senate
1310 passed the Senate just a few minutes ago. Over the next week or so, each chamber will be considering the amendments made by the other. I think that we will be able to get all of these bills to the Governor’s desk for signature.
Best wishes, Jamie
Senator Jamie Pedersen
43rd Legislative District
jamie.pedersen@leg.wa.gov
pronouns: he, him, his
Olympia Office
JAC 235
P.O. Box 40443
Olympia, WA 98504-0443
(360) 786-7628
District Office
1200 12th Ave. S., Ste. 801
Seattle, WA 98144
(206) 729-3206
Legislative Assistant
Sam Hendrickson
sam.hendrickson@leg.wa.gov
To subscribe to my online newsletter, please e-mail me. To send any comments, or to learn more please visit my website.
Ed note: The memo below from Parkshore’s ED was forwarded to me by a friend. Now a public document, it received considerable discussion at Skyline’s meeting yesterday which left many unanswered questions. I think the hope is that our parent company can be fully transparent and seek input from Skyline’s Resident’s Association as this proposed project develops.
“Memorandum: Date: April 1, 2021
RE: Exciting Masterplanning News
Good Afternoon,
This communication is to make you aware of a very exciting project that Parkshore and Transforming Age are currently working on! As some of you are aware, Transforming Age affiliated with The Gardens at Juanita Bay in December 2018 with a commitment to masterplan the property and plan for the future.
In partnership with design architects, as well as the City of Kirkland, we have identified a project of which I believe Parkshore residents and team members will be particularly proud. The plan is for a Parkshore satellite campus to include a luxury lakeside apartment community with 12-apartments that overlook Juanita Bay including a dock and over 100 feet of waterfront, as well as, a tree-lined parkside 40-apartment residence at Juanita Village, three blocks apart.
This added satellite campus would give current Parkshore residents seamless access to Kirkland via Parkshore’s private luxury vessel and Parkshore Juanita residents access to Madison Park amenities.
Initial research suggests this will be a very attractive masterplan and I am personally thrilled at the added benefit this would extend to current Parkshore residents. Our next step is to share this exciting news with our current waitlist members and request an Expression of Interest in the form of a $1,000 fully refundable deposit. Following the notification and invitation to our waitlist members, information will also be shared with residents of Kirkland. If you have friends or family who may be interested in this project, please encourage them to contact our Sales Team for additional information. After the expression of interest campaign, we will verify market demand for the project before moving forward.
If interested, you are welcome to join an informational Zoom webinar on Wednesday, April 14 at 3pm to learn more about this project. As always, thank you for being a special part of the Parkshore community, it truly is a community like no other.”
Thanks to Barb W. for the update
We’re proud to share we’ve reached a major funding milestone! The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has now allocated $59.9 million in funding from the Small Starts Program to the Madison BRT – RapidRide G Line project for construction. This funding allocation builds on years of work with the FTA to meet the rigorous readiness requirements for the Small Starts Grant.Now that funding has been allocated, the next step is for the FTA to execute the grant agreement with SDOT. After the grant is executed and a contractor is on board, we’ll be able to start construction. If all goes as planned, we expect construction to start this fall and you can hop on a RapidRide G Line bus in 2024! Read more in our April 5, 2021 blog post. (L) Boarding a RapidRide bus. (R) As part of this project, we’ll build a community-requested pedestrian signal at this location (Madison and 10th) near Seattle University. Photo Credit: SDOT Flickr. PREPARING FOR CONSTRUCTIONWe are collecting additional information from neighbors on access needs and who to contact during construction. Feel free to contact us with questions or to virtually meet with our project team. Check out our webpage for details on what crews will be working on during construction. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE Fall 2020: Completed final design Spring 2021: Finalize funding After the Small Starts Grant Agreement is executed with the FTA, we’ll move forward with hiring a construction contractor Early 2021: Advertise for construction bids to build the project After a contractor is selected, we will know more about the planned construction sequencing, timeline, and intersection closures Fall 2021: Anticipated construction start 2024: Complete construction and open the RapidRide G Line SEE WHAT THE PROJECT WILL LOOK LIKE ON YOUR BLOCK! See the final design sheets showing what the project will look like on your block: seattle.gov/Transportation/MadisonBRT.htm. PROJECT MAP WITH KEY FEATURES |
Click to enlarge. Above are renderings of the Madison BRT – RapidRide G Line at different locations along the route. Click to enlarge. Clockwise starting from top left: Central Library: Rendering at Central Library shows a station shelter, real time arrival info, station platform at the same level as the bus, and bus lane. Madison & Terry: Rendering at Madison and Terry shows a center running station, pedestrian refuge (protected space in the middle of the street), center running bus lanes, new curb ramps, landscaping, station shelters, and real time arrival info. Madison and 12th: Rendering at Madison and 12th Ave shows a center running station, new curb ramps, pedestrian refuge (protected space to wait in the middle of the street), bus lanes, landscaping, and new curb ramps. Madison & John: Rendering at Madison and E John St shows a station platform level with the bus, bus only lane, new curb ramp, yellow tactile strip for people with vision impairments, station shelter, and real time arrival info. CITY RESOURCES We know these are especially challenging times for businesses. Here are some resources the City is offering. The Office of Economic Development is offering free technical assistance to businesses applying for COVID-19 recovery loans. They’ll help you navigate the application and documentation process, and they have staff who speak multiple languages. Contact the Office of Economic Development to get connected to the right resources depending on your situation: OED@seattle.gov, 206-684-8090. Seattle Department of Transportation is offering streamlined, free temporary permits for outdoor cafes, retail merchandise displays, food trucks, and vending carts that are valid for up to 6 months! We are also offering temporary street closures to support restaurants and retail. Visit this website for more information. 시애틀시는 연방 정부 보조금을 확정하는 단계에 있으며, 이르면 2021년 봄부터 공사가 시작될 것으로 예상됩니다. 경제개발국은 COVID-19 회생 대출을 신청하는 기업에 무료 기술 지원을 제공하고 있습니다. 신청과 서류 절차에 대한 안내와 여러 언어를 사용하는 직원들의 도움도 받을 수 있습니다. 여러분이 처한 상황에 알맞은 정보를 안내 받으려면 경제개발국으로 문의하십시오: OED@seattle.gov, 206-684-8090. 시애틀 교통부는 야외 카페, 소매 상품 전시, 푸드 트럭 및 자동판매 카트에 대해 6개월간 유효한 간소화된 무료 임시 허가를 제공합니다! 또한 식당과 소매점을 지원하기 위해 임시 거리 폐쇄를 제공하고 있습니다. 다음 웹사이트를 방문하여 자세한 내용을 확인하십시오: www.seattle.gov/office-of-economic-development/covid-19/outdoor-permit. 西雅圖市目前正在最終確定聯邦撥款,我們預計該工程最早將於2021年春季開始。 經濟發展辦公室為申請COVID-19復甦貸款的企業提供免費技術援助。他們會幫助您對申請和文檔的各個流程進行指引,並且他們的員工會說多種語言。請與經濟發展辦公室聯繫,以根據您的具體情況獲得合適的資源:OED@seattle.gov,206-684-8090 西雅圖交通運輸部為有效期長達6個月的戶外咖啡館,零售商品展示,食品卡車和自動販賣車提供簡化的免費臨時許可證!我們還提供臨時封閉的街道,以支持餐館和零售。訪問此網頁以獲取更多信息: www.seattle.gov/office-of-economic-development/covid-19/outdoor-permit。 Thành phố Seattle đang trong quá trình hoàn tất các khoản trợ cấp liên bang và chúng tôi dự kiến việc xây dựng sẽ bắt đầu sớm nhất vào mùa xuân năm 2021. Văn phòng Phát triển Kinh tế (Office of Economic Development) đang cung cấp hỗ trợ kỹ thuật miễn phí cho các doanh nghiệp xin các khoản vay phục hồi COVID-19. Họ sẽ giúp bạn đi qua quá trình đăng ký và cung cấp tài liệu và họ có đội ngũ nói nhiều ngôn ngữ. Liên hệ với Văn phòng Phát triển Kinh tế để được kết nối với các nguồn lực phù hợp tùy thuộc vào tình huống của bạn: OED@seattle.gov, 206-684-8090. Sở Giao thông Vận tải Seattle (Seattle Department of Transportation) đang cung cấp được đơn giản hoá, miễn phí giấy phép tạm thời cho các quán cà phê ngoài trời, trưng bày hàng bán lẻ, xe bán đồ ăn và xe bán hàng tự động có giá trị trong tối đa 6 tháng! Chúng tôi cũng sẽ tạm thời đóng cửa đường phố để hỗ trợ các nhà hàng và cửa hàng bán lẻ. Truy cập trang web này để biết thêm thông tin: www.seattle.gov/office-of-economic-development/covid-19/outdoor-permit. WANT TO STAY INFORMED? Call our info line at 206-484-2780, Monday to Friday, 8 AM to 5 PM, to speak with a project team member. You can also email us at MadisonBRT@seattle.gov or text “Madison” to 33222 to sign up for project alerts via text. Standard texting rates apply. Thank you, Sara Colling Outreach Lead Madison BRT – RapidRide G Line project team ![]() |
| For more information on the project, please visit our website. If you have specific questions, or would like to schedule a meeting or briefing, please email us at MadisonBRT@seattle.gov or call us at 206-484-2780. Hadaaad mashruucan suaalo ka qabtit email noo soo dir: MadisonBRT@seattle.gov ama nasoo wac: 206-484-2780. Nếu bạn co cau hỏi về dự an, vui long gửi email cho chung toi theo địa chỉ MadisonBRT@seattle.gov hoặc gọi cho chung toi theo số 206-484-2780. 如果您對本工程有任何疑問,請電郵 MadisonBRT@seattle.gov 或致電 206-484-2780. यदिआपके पास प्रोजेक्ट के बारे में प्रश्न हैं, तोकृपया हमें MadisonBRT@seattle. govपर ईमेल करें या हमें 206-484-2780 पर कॉल करें 이 프로젝트에 대한 질문이 있으시면, 이메일 MadisonBRT@seattle.gov 로 또는 206-484-2780로 전화 주십시요. Si tiene preguntas sobre el proyecto, por favor envienos un mensaje a MadisonBRT@seattle.gov o llamenos al 206-484-2780 Connect with us online or share using #madisonbrt You are receiving this email because you have subscribed to receive email updates related to the Madison BRT project. The E Union St PBL project is a separate but adjacent project to Madison BRT that will provide bike connections to Capitol Hill and the Central District. We thought you might be interested to learn about this project as someone who lives, works or plays in the area. If you’d like to receive future emails about the Union St PBL project, you can subscribe by visiting https://el2.envirolytical.com/registration/form/48432. Our mailing address is: Seattle Department of Transportation PO Box 34996 700 Fifth Ave, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98124-4996 Add us to your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list |
CIVIC ENGAGEMENT GROUP (CEG) SPECIAL PROGRAM FILM SHOWING
The Social Dilemma
SUNDAY APRIL 11 at 3:30 p.m. on ZOOM and 370
…………………………………………….
To be followed by Public Discussion in the Skyline Chat Room — Beginning at 5:05 p.m. (Link can be found on CareMerge)
………………………………………………
The Social Dilemma (2020, Netflix streaming) 94 min. – Subtitles. That social media can be addictive and creepy isn’t a revelation to anyone who uses Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and the like. But in Jeff Orlowski’s documentary “The Social Dilemma,” conscientious defectors from these companies explain that the perniciousness of social networking platforms is a feature, not a bug. They claim that the manipulation of human behavior for profit is coded into these companies with Machiavellian precision: Infinite scrolling and push notifications keep users constantly engaged; personalized recommendations use data not just to predict but also to influence our actions, turning users into easy prey for advertisers and propagandists.
Thanks to Sandy J.