Single-use thin plastic grocery carryout bags clog recycling equipment and pollute our waterways with trash and smaller bits as they break down. ESSB 5323 will prohibit such bags across the state. Grocery companies, recyclers, and trade organizations support this bill because it makes the regulations uniform across the state. The details in this bill have been thoroughly negotiated, so email your Representatives to help pass it.
Just FYI, long term residents Les and Lucy McCants have moved to Aegis Gardens in Newcastle on the Eastside. They have a nice large 1 BR apt. Address: 13056 SE 76th St.; Newcastle, WA. Les can be reached on his cell phone.
Posted inSkyline Info|Comments Off on Les and Lucy – a new address
This coming Sunday afternoon, the Seattle Opera will perform “Charlie Parker’s Yardbird”. Don and Sue Phillips have two tickets to give away (plus two seats reserved on the Skyline bus leaving at 1:10 pm). If you would like to go, contact them at 206-407-1728 or dhp1012@bellsouth.net – first-come, first-served (as usual). To learn more about this opera, visit https://www.seattleopera.org/on-stage/charlie-parkers-yardbird.
Donna McKinney has two tickets for the Seattle Symphony performance of Mozart’s Concerto for Two Pianos on Friday, February 28, at noon. She also has two tickets for the 5th Avenue Theatre’s “Sister Act” on Sunday, March 22, at 7:00 pm. If you’re interested, she asks that you text her at 206-902-8161 or email georgedonnamck@msn.com.
Announcement
Val Lynch has a small supply of dog treats that are, sadly, no longer needed. If anyone would like to put them to use, that would be good news. Let her know of your interest at vlynch14@gmail.com (first-come, first-served).
About this blog post
The goal for this blog posting is to increase the connections among people who live at Skyline in whatever ways make sense. Announcements that fit with that goal are welcome.
On Wednesdays, Put Barber will compile any announcements sent to skyline.notices@gmail.com into a list of notices like the ones above, which will then be posted to “Skyline 725 Happenings” (https://www.skyline725,com) early Thursday morning. Please include your contact information with any message you would like to see posted and, if you prefer to be contacted in some way (text, email, phone, or at a specific time), please include your preference as well.
Please send anything you would to suggest be included before 5 pm on Wednesdays to skyline.notices@gmail.com.
Ed note: My grandchildren in middle and high school confirm what is being reported below.There is also a second epidemic of lung injury due to vaping. Why isn’t Juul out of business?
From the February 20, 2020 edition of the New England Journal of Medicine
” The youth vaping epidemic is of longer duration. Current use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products increased by 900% among U.S. middle and high school students between 2011 and 2015, declined in 2016, and then increased again between 2017 and 2018, erasing previous progress.2 In 2019, more than 5.2 million young people in the United States reported current use, including 27.5% of high school students and 10.5% of middle school students.2 In contrast, current use among adults remained unchanged from 2014 to 2017, and in 2018, 3.2% of U.S. adults (8.1 million) reported current use of e-cigarettes, including 7.6% of adults 18 to 24 years of age (2.1 million).5 Use of these products among young people is driven by multiple factors, including advertising, attractive flavors, and the availability of easily concealable devices that deliver high levels of nicotine.1 Recent product innovation has also contributed; “pod mods,” including Juul, are often shaped like USB flash drives and are easily concealable. Pod mods also deliver nicotine in the form of nicotine salts, which allow high levels of nicotine to be inhaled more easily and with less irritation than the free-base nicotine used in older-generation e-cigarettes.2 Increased nicotine levels are a matter of concern for young people, since nicotine is highly addictive and can harm brain development, which continues through the mid-20s.1 “
Posted inHealth|Comments Off on The vaping epidemic
Did the art committee approve this large tennis ball sticker decorating the bleak concrete on B2 in the garage? Is a new trend starting? Do we need a subcommittee for garage art? What is your opinion?
President Donald Trump, easily fending off his remaining challenger for the Republican nomination in Iowa and New Hampshire, continues to lob insults against media organizations covering the campaign.
While friction between presidents and the press are nothing new, President Trump often calls many respected news organizations “Fake News.” On this Presidents Day, we thought we’d offer some different views on the free press from some of Trump’s predecessors in a format the president enjoys.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump … 2 years
The Fake News hates me saying that they are the Enemy of the People only because they know it’s TRUE. I am providing a great service by explaining this to the American People. They purposely cause great division & distrust. They can also cause War! They are very dangerous & sick! [4:38 a.m., Aug. 5, 2018]
Thomas Jefferson @SageOfMonticello … 204 years
… If a nation expects to be ignorant & free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty & property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves; nor can they be safe with them without information. Where the press is free … all is safe. [Letter to Col. Charles Yancey, Jan. 6, 1816]
John Adams @OldSinkOrSwim … 240 years
The liberty of the press is essential to the security of the state. [Free-Press Clause, Massachusetts Constitution, 1780]
James Madison @LittleJemmy … 229 years
Whatever facilitates a general intercourse of sentiments, as good roads, domestic commerce, a free press and particularly a circulation of newspapers through the entire body of the people, and Representatives going from, and returning among every part of them, is equivalent to a contraction of territorial limits, and is favorable to liberty, where these may be too extensive. [“On Public Opinion,” Dec. 19, 1791]
George Washington @AmericanCincinnatus … 237 years
If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us, the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. [Address to the offices of the Army, March 15, 1783]
John Quincy Adams @TheAbolitionist … 195 years
The freedom of the press should be inviolate. [Inaugural address, 1825]
Franklin Delano Roosevelt @ThatManInTheWhiteHouse … 82 years
The fires of freedom and civil liberties burn low in other lands, they must be made brighter in our own. If in other lands the press and books and literature of all kinds are censored, we must redouble our efforts here to keep them free. If in other lands the eternal truths of the past are threatened by intolerance, we must provide a safe place for their perpetuation. [Speech, June 30, 1938]
Abraham Lincoln @HonestAbe … 155 years
Let the people know the facts, and the country will be safe. [Reported in the Daily Intelligencer, 1865]
James A. Garfield @BoatmanJim … 142 years
Not for its own sake alone, but for the sake of society and good government, the press should be free. Publicity is the strong bond which unites the people and their government. Authority should do no act that will not bear the light. [Address before The Ohio Editorial Association, Cleveland, July 11, 1878]
by Meg Groeling – thanks Ann M. for letting us know!
There are times when research seems repetitive. Battles, generals, troop movements, the effects of one thing upon another, and on and on. It is an endless stream, and once one dips one’s toes in it, either you want to do it again or again, or you just get up and go home.
I love research, but even I have to take a break once in a while. For that, my recreational research concerns . . . cats. I had pretty much exhausted the subject of the draft during the Civil War for one day, and I wandered to the search engine and typed in my subject: Cats & the Civil War.
Of course, I had read the anecdote from Mary Lincoln, who had replied, rather tartly, to an early inquiry concerning her husband’s hobbies, that Lincoln’s main one was, “cats.” Ms. Mary followed this up in a letter to her husband, written while she was on a visit to her family home in Kentucky with the children. Apparently young Eddy Lincoln was following “your hobby” by coming home with a stray kitten under his arm.
We know about the gift of Mr. Seward to Lincoln when he was still in Springfield, although President-elect. Some sources say the new Secretary of State brought the Lincoln family two kittens, some say three. No matter–there were plenty of kittens to help Mr. Lincoln ready himself for Washington.
Lincoln allegedly fed his White House cats, Tabby and Dixie, from the dinner table. Mrs. Lincoln didn’t like that, but her husband defended his actions. “If that gold fork was good enough for President Buchanan, it is good enough for Tabby.”
Irene Campbell (kiscinike@msn.com) would like
to borrow a pasta maker to construct a dessert.
If you can loan her one, send her an email to let her know.
Announcement
The Papyrus Store in Downtown Seattle is
closing. Everything is 50% or more off.
Valentine cards, sympathy cards,
birthday cards, anniversary cards, Christmas cards, get well cards, thank you
cards, etc., etc., are all still
available as of last Sunday. Also,
wrapping paper, ribbon, gift bags, and numerous other items. It’s located on one of the upper floors on
the west side of Pacific Place, 600 Pine Street (right across from
Nordstrom). Thanks to Mary Terrell for
this information.
Query
Did anyone attend the meeting at the Frye on Tuesday evening who can tell Put Barber a little about what happened? (Or, pick up for him instead at the CEG meeting 4pm Friday?) Let him know by calling 206-325-8818 or emailing putnam.barber@gmail.com.
About this blog post
The goal for this blog
posting is to increase the connections among people who live at Skyline in
whatever ways make sense. Other kinds of announcements that fit with that goal
are welcome.
On Wednesdays, Put
Barber will compile any announcements sent to skyline.notices@gmail.com into a list of notices like the ones above,
which will then be posted to “Skyline 725 Happenings” (https://www.skyline725.com/) early Thursday morning. Please include your
contact information in your message and, if f you prefer to be contacted in some
way (text, email, phone, or at a specific time), please include your preference
as well.
Please send anything
you would like to suggest to be included before 5 pm on Wednesdays to skyline.notices@gmail.com.
My fellow Americans, we face a national emergency. Never before have we had a president so utterly lacking in personal integrity, so able to lie and abuse his powers with such impunity and so blindly backed by an amoral party, an unscrupulous attorney general and a media-fund-raising juggernaut. It is an engine of raw power that will cram anything the president says or does right down your throat.
James Carville had it exactly right when he noted on “Morning Joe” the other day that the only thing standing in the way of lasting damage by this machine to all that makes America unique and great is the Democrats’ nominating the right person to defeat Donald Trump.
We have to get this right. This is no ordinary time, no ordinary Republican Party, no ordinary incumbent, and it will require an extraordinary Democratic machine to triumph.
Because, without doubt, Russia and China also will be “voting” Trump 2020 — for three reasons: (1) Trump keeps America in turmoil and unable to focus on building the infrastructure we need to dominate the 21st century the way we did the 20th. (2) Both Beijing and Moscow know that Trump is so disliked by America’s key allies that he can never galvanize a global coalition against China or Russia. And (3) both Russia and China know that Trump is utterly transactional and will never challenge them on human rights abuses. Trump is their chump, and they will not let him go easily.
So who is the right Democratic candidate? Well, for starters I will tell you who it is not. It is not Bernie Sanders. On which planet in the Milky Way galaxy is an avowed “socialist” — who wants to take away the private health care coverage of some 150 million Americans and replace it with a gigantic, untested Medicare-for-All program, which he’d also extend to illegal immigrants — going to defeat the Trump machine this year? It will cast Sanders as Che Guevara — and it won’t even be that hard.
Yes, the failures of American capitalism to deliver inclusive growth, which have propelled the Sanders campaign and animated his followers, require urgent attention by our next president. But Sanders, in key cases, has the wrong solutions to the right problems. He’s the wrong candidate to take down Trump.
Please, Democrats, don’t tell me you need Sanders’s big, ill-thought-through, revolutionary grand schemes to get inspired and mobilized for this election. You want a revolution? I’ll give you a revolution: four more years of Donald Trump, unencumbered by the need to get re-elected. That will be a revolution! And it will do permanent damage to the institutions and norms that have sustained this country since its founding, not to mention our environment, which Trump has been selling off to oil, gas and mining companies at an alarming pace.
So, who is the right candidate and what is the right strategy?
On strategy, we know the formula that works, because it already has: Appeal to independents, moderate Republicans and suburban women. These are the constituencies that did not like Hillary Clinton and were ready to give Trump a chance in 2016 — but abandoned him in 2018 and delivered the House of Representatives to the Democrats, and then also two governorships in red states.
If Democrats can choose a candidate who can hold the core Democratic base and also appeal to these same independents, moderate Republicans and suburban women in the key swing states, they can absolutely defeat Trump.
How do you do that as a candidate?
For starters, by stressing national unity, personal integrity and a willingness to pursue bipartisanship whenever the other side is ready. A lot of Americans are worried sick that Trump is tearing the country in half.
As Larry Diamond, editor of The Journal of Democracy, pointed out to me, several studies he’s been publishing show that the best way to defeat illiberal populism is not by trying to out-polarize the polarizer in chief but rather through broad, inclusive electoral strategies that pragmatically address the economic and social concerns of voters, including those who had previously voted for the populist.
That was the approach that enabled the secular opposition to defeat the party of Turkey’s autocratic president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in municipal elections last year in Istanbul and other cities. A similar depolarizing approach powered the victory of Greece’s liberal-centrist New Democracy party over the ruling left-wing populist Syriza in national elections last year.
You also do it by repeating every hour every day — with evidence — that Trump is out to destroy Obamacare through the courts, which means eliminating its coverage for pre-existing conditions, and only the Democrats will save it and improve it.
You do it by not only talking about how to redivide the pie — which we need to do — but by also talking about how to grow the pie, how to create more taxpayers and how to inspire more innovators. Ours is a capitalist country. Americans admire successful entrepreneurs. Let’s praise job creators and risk-takers — as long as they and their companies pay their taxes. You want more and better jobs, you need more Steve Jobs.
You do it by celebrating the growing economy that Barack Obama reignited and Trump continued, while making clear that it still needs work. Too much of the Trump tax cuts have gone to companies and the most wealthy, with virtually nothing invested in infrastructure — roads, ports, schools, bandwidth, scientific research — or affordable housing, which we must have for inclusive prosperity.
You do it by hitting Trump hard on the environment, but not focusing just on “climate change,” which is an abstraction for most people. Trump is unfit to serve four more years because of how he has removed so many protections for the water and air America’s kids drink and breathe every day.
And you do it by supporting a balanced approach to immigration reform — a high wall, with a big gate.
I was glad to see candidates with this kind of message, like Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg, trending better in Iowa and New Hampshire. It showed that lots of Democrats are searching in this direction.
But there is one candidate on the Democratic side who not only has a track record of supporting all those issues but also has the resources to build a machine big enough to take on the Trump machine.
This candidate also has the toughness to take on Trump, because while Trump was pretending to be a C.E.O. on the show “The Apprentice,” this candidate was actually building one of the most admired global companies as a real C.E.O.
This candidate is not cuddly, he is not always politically correct and he will not always tell you what you want to hear — or try to outbid you on how many free services he’ll give away. He’s made mistakes, especially around stop-and-frisk policing in New York City, which disproportionately targeted black and brown men and for which he recently apologized.
His mistakes, though, have to be weighed against a record of courageously speaking out and devoting enormous personal resources to virtually every progressive cause — gun control, abortion rights, climate change, Planned Parenthood, education reform for predominantly minority schools, affordable housing, income inequality and tax reform. And he has vowed as president to focus on building black wealth, not just ending poverty.
And this candidate knows how to get stuff done — he can fight this fire at the scale of the fire. His team has for years used social networks to promote progressive issues to centrist and conservative audiences. He won’t cede the internet/Facebook/Twitter battlefield to Trump’s team, who are killers in that space.
And this candidate is now rising steadily in the polls. This candidate is Michael Bloomberg. This candidate has Trump very worried.
Yes, Sanders is also polling well against Trump, but the Trump machine has not begun to focus on him yet — it hasn’t begun bombing Facebook with ads about how Sanders honeymooned in the Soviet Union.
Sitting here today, Bloomberg — paired with a progressive vice-presidential candidate who can appeal to Sanders’s voters — has the best chance to carry the day.
In an age when political extremists go all the way, and moderates tend to just go away, Bloomberg has the right stuff — a moderate progressive with a heart of gold but the toughness of a rattlesnake — for what is going to be an incredibly big, brutal task: making Donald Trump a one-term president.
(Disclosure: Bloomberg Philanthropies has donated to Planet Word, the museum my wife is building in Washington, to promote reading and literacy.)
Posted inPolitics|Comments Off on Paging Michael Bloomberg