Thanks to Christine A.
You’ll enjoy visiting popular attractions such as the Bainbridge Island Museum of Art, Arts and Crafts, Zutto Vintage & Antiques, and more! There are various restaurants in the nearby areas, notably Doc’s Marina Grill, where you can enjoy the waterfront views from their patio.
Thanks to Pam P.
Loading…
Recent research makes it clear that any amount of drinking can be detrimental. Here’s why you may want to cut down on your consumption beyond Dry January.
Ed note: When I developed A-fib, I asked my cardiologist if there was a common lifestyle causative factor. He said that alcohol was highly suspect. I said, “What?! I thought red wine was protective!” He shook his head saying, “it may help socially, but there’s no proof that it helps your heart.”
By Dana G. Smith in the NYT
Sorry to be a buzz-kill, but that nightly glass or two of wine is not improving your health.
After decades of confusing and sometimes contradictory research (too much alcohol is bad for you but a little bit is good; some types of alcohol are better for you than others; just kidding, it’s all bad), the picture is becoming clearer: Even small amounts of alcohol can have health consequences.
Research published in November revealed that between 2015 and 2019, excessive alcohol use resulted in roughly 140,000 deaths per year in the United States. About 40 percent of those deaths had acute causes, like car crashes, poisonings and homicides. But the majority were caused by chronic conditions attributed to alcohol, such as liver disease, cancer and heart disease.
When experts talk about the dire health consequences linked to excessive alcohol use, people often assume that it’s directed at individuals who have an alcohol use disorder. But the health risks from drinking can come from moderate consumption as well.
“Risk starts to go up well below levels where people would think, ‘Oh, that person has an alcohol problem,’” said Dr. Tim Naimi, director of the University of Victoria’s Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research. “Alcohol is harmful to the health starting at very low levels.”
If you’re wondering whether you should cut back on your drinking, here’s what to know about when and how alcohol impacts your health.
“Excessive alcohol use” technically means anything above the U.S. Dietary Guidelines’ recommended daily limits. That’s more than two drinks a day for men and more than one drink a day for women.
There is also emerging evidence “that there are risks even within these levels, especially for certain types of cancer and some forms of cardiovascular disease,” said Marissa Esser, who leads the alcohol program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The recommended daily limits are not meant to be averaged over a week, either. In other words, if you abstain Monday through Thursday and have two or three drinks a night on the weekend, those weekend drinks count as excessive consumption. It’s both the cumulative drinks over time and the amount of alcohol in your system on any one occasion that can cause damage. (continued)
Aptly named rose decorating the 4th floor patio in the Cascade Tower – a hybrid tea rose known both for its beauty and fragrance.
Thanks to MaryLou P.
Click here for the Memory Hub newsletter.
Community Stories, Brain Health, News, Brain Health Awareness Month
Neighboring organizations come together to promote brain health for this second annual event
From 1-4 p.m. on Wednesday July 10, head to Seattle’s First Hill for the second annual Brain Health Block Party! This special event promoting brain health features outdoor “brain-healthy” activity stations spread throughout the neighborhood. As you walk from site to site, solve a puzzle, make your own trail mix, play games, create art, and more! Read about last year’s Brain Health Block Party.
Initiated by the Memory Hub, a community center operated by UW Memory and Brain Wellness Center, the fun neighborhood event celebrates easy steps we can take to promote brain health – like staying active, reducing stress, challenging our minds, connecting with others, and eating a healthy diet. It’s also a unique way to build awareness about memory loss and dementia.
“We are enthusiastically counting down the days until the 2nd Annual Brain Health Block Party!” states Katie Zeitler, program manager for the Dementia Friends public awareness program with the UW Memory and Brain Wellness Center. “Brain health and social connection are important for everyone, and we look forward to celebrating brain health with our community.”
Nine organizations are partnering to produce this year’s event, offering activities at the following locations:
Each of the participating organizations has a commitment to supporting older adults and the community at large. Ildiko Pikali, Director of Life Enrichment for Horizon House, notes: “Horizon House is excited to be a part of raising awareness about brain health and aging by participating in the First Hill Brain Health Block Party in partnership with like-minded organizations. We hope to demonstrate the unique and enriching lifestyle that exists in this diverse community, as well as how it contributes to overall well-being and mental health.”
Jessica Baloun, Community Engagement & Outreach Manager with Town Hall Seattle, agrees: “As an arts and culture organization dedicated to fostering an engaged community, Town Hall is thrilled to join our First Hill neighbors and participate in the Brain Health Block Party this year. We hope to see familiar faces and meet new community members as we enjoy activities that promote cognitive health!”
Visiting all 9 stations is about 1 mile. The event is free, family-friendly and all ages – with a special invitation to adults age 50+.
Pick up an event map at any participating location on the day of, or download it in advance here. Collect stamps at each station, and visit at least 3 stations for a chance to win a special brain-health raffle prize.
For more information about this website, please contact mbwc@uw.edu
Yet Trump Disavows Project 2025 Transition Plan
BY ADRIANA GOMEZ LICON / AP from Time Magazine
Miami — Donald Trump distanced himself Friday from Project 2025, a massive proposed overhaul of the federal government drafted by longtime allies and former officials in his administration, days after the head of the think tank responsible for the program suggested there would be a second American Revolution.
“I know nothing about Project 2025,” Trump posted on his social media website. “I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”
Project 2025 outlines a dramatic expansion of presidential power and a plan to fire as many as 50,000 government workers to replace them with Trump loyalists. President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign has worked to draw more attention to the agenda, particularly as Biden tries to keep fellow Democrats on board after his disastrous debate.
Trump has outlined his own plans to remake the government if he wins a second term, including staging the largest deportation operation in U.S. history and imposing tariffs on potentially all imports. His campaign has previously warned outside allies not to presume to speak for the former president and suggested their transition-in-waiting efforts were unhelpful.
Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts said on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast Tuesday that Republicans are “in the process of taking this country back.” Former U.S. Rep. Dave Brat of Virginia hosted the show for Bannon, who is serving a four-month prison term.
“We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be,” Roberts said.
Those comments were widely circulated online and blasted by the Biden campaign, which issued a statement saying Trump and his allies were “dreaming of a violent revolution to destroy the very idea of America.”
Some of the people involved in Project 2025 are former senior administration officials. The project’s director is Paul Dans, who served as chief of staff at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management under Trump. Russ Vought, who was director of the Office of Management and Budget under Trump, wrote one of the chapters. John McEntee, a former director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office in the Trump administration, is a senior adviser. (continued)
Thanks to Mary Jane F.
Hallelujah! Thank you to my creative friends for all these great Biblical math problems. They’ll really help the Oklahoma school superintendent’s goal of inserting biblical content into math and science! I’ve collected a multitude of the problems into one post for ease of reading:
1) Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3).
If he lay with one wife or concubine every night, but took off one day per week for rest, how many days would it take him to lay with all of his wives and concubines?
2) David captured the foreskins of 200 Philistines (1 Samuel 18:27).
If David split those foreskins into baskets of 40 foreskins each, how many baskets would he need? (continued)
If passed, Initiative 2117 would repeal the state’s new Climate Commitment Act, which has raised more than $2B for projects like electrifying transit.
by John Stang in Crosscut
The M/V Guemes crosses the channel between Anacortes and Guemes Island. The 45-year-old vessel is scheduled to be replaced by a newer model, paid for with cap-and-invest dollars, unless voters decide to kill that program in the fall election. (John Stang for Cascade PBS)
It takes about five minutes to cross the channel between Anacortes and Guemes Island. But the trip seems a lot longer to the people waiting in their cars to board the ferry that takes them across.
On a recent Tuesday afternoon, traffic backed up on both sides of the channel, waiting for the ferry. The 45-year-old vessel can handle 21 cars and 100 passengers per trip. When the ferry left the dock with a full load, about 12 to 15 vehicles had to wait another 25 minutes for the M/V Guemes to make the round trip.
Although wide enough to need a ferry, the channel is also so narrow that you can hear the ferry engines rev up as the M/V Guemes leaves the opposite shore. Guemes Island is home to 700 to 900 people, with a rustic general store/gas station/tavern, a couple parks and a bunch of artist studios. Unless you have your own boat, it costs $13.50 per car to get to the island; nothing to get off. A 2013 study said the M/V Guemes had 10 years remaining before its innards would start to fail.
Last January, the ferry shut down for one-and-a-half weeks due to a cracked bracket that holds an underwater propulsion thruster used to maneuver the ferry. During that downtime, a passenger-only ferry took over the route, though it was threatened at times by high winds and waves.
The Skagit County Public Works Department, which operates the ferry, believes it would be cheaper in the long run to get a new ferry than just replacing broken parts, said Jennifer Rogers, the department’s spokeswoman.
The price tag for a new Guemes Island electric ferry is $45 million. With $10 million from cap-and-invest revenue allocated by the Legislature to build a new ferry, the project is on its way.
The money being raised by Washington’s new Climate Commitment Act — the formal name for the cap-and-invest program — is doing more than shore up the state budget. The more than $2 billion collected from quarterly carbon auctions is being used to address climate change and for climate-adjacent projects like the ferry system. (continued)
by Heather Cox Richardson
Loading…
Thanks to Mike C.
The Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve World Heritage property protects key overwintering sites for the monarch butterfly. The overwintering concentration of butterflies in the property is a superlative natural phenomenon. The millions of monarch butterflies that return to the property every year bend tree branches by their weight, fill the sky when they take flight, and make a sound like light rain with the beating of their wings. Witnessing this unique phenomenon is an exceptional experience of nature.
Criterion (vii): The overwintering concentration of the monarch butterfly in the property is the most dramatic manifestation of the phenomenon of insect migration. Up to a billion monarch butterflies return annually, from breeding areas as far away as Canada, to land in close-packed clusters within 14 overwintering colonies in the oyamel fir forests of central Mexico. The property protects 8 of these colonies and an estimated 70% of the total overwintering population of the monarch butterfly’s eastern population.
Integrity
The property includes more than half of the overwintering colonies of the monarch butterfly’s eastern population. They provide a good sample of the areas that are essential for maintaining this superlative natural phenomenon. The maintenance of the standing forest and the microclimates that they create is the key management requirement, thus any threat to the forests is of utmost concern. Illegal logging is a known threat to the property with potential direct impacts on its Outstanding Universal Value. Public use has been increasing and the levels of visitation and infrastructure provided require careful control both in relation to impacts on the ecosystem and the quality of experience provided by the property to visitors. Due to its migratory nature, the maintenance of the overwintering phenomenon also requires attention to the conservation of the monarch butterfly by those countries through which it travels during its life cycle.
Requirements for Protection and Management
The principal focus of protection and management should be to prevent illegal logging in the property. Priorities to achieve this include concerted planning and action between all relevant federal, state and local agencies, and work with local communities on environmental protection and the provision of alternative livelihoods to logging. As the overwintering phenomenon is a significant attractor to visitors, management also needs to be directed to achieving sustainable public use of the property. This should respect the quality of the visitor experience and promote benefit-sharing mechanisms for local communities as an incentive to enhance their support to the conservation of the property. Continued investment in coordinated continent-wide management of the migratory phenomenon is a further important dimension of site management. Achieving all of these priorities requires the provision of adequate and sustained institutional and financial support.
Commentary by Heather Cox Richardson
Loading…
For the latest nearby Memory Hub newsletter, please click here.
By Danny Westneat – Seattle Times columnist (thanks to Bob P.)
In the fire hose of news this past week, the airlifts are an image that needs more attention.
“We are now living in two very different United States,” was how one Seattle-area health care provider summed up the dystopian situation.
When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled this week that Idaho hospitals could resume providing emergency abortion care to ill pregnant women, but only temporarily, the story also emerged about how strained that care had become.
Since January, emergency services have been airlifting women, often hemorrhaging or in sepsis, out of Idaho rather than treating them there. It’s due to our new “states’ rights” health care system, where abortion is a felony here, and available and legal over there.
“In Idaho, we’ve been flying out about a patient a week to Utah or Oregon or Washington, because the fetus is nonviable or the life of the mother is at risk,” Dr. Edward McEachern, of Boise State University, said this past week.
“I am seeing patients from Idaho, but also from Texas, Arizona, Alabama and other states,” said Dr. Elizabeth Harrington, a University of Washington OB-GYN.
One justice called it a “months-long catastrophe.”
from the Dworkin Report
Here’s a list of prominent Republicans and Trump’s former backers who are not supporting him, and some of their quotes. Keep in mind this is just a sample of key players and not a full list:
GOP Gov. Brian Kemp: “I didn’t vote for him.” Kemp confirmed he didn’t vote for Trump in the Georgia primary.
GOP Sen. Susan Collins: “I cannot support former President Trump,” and says she did not vote for him in the primary.
GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski: “I certainly can’t get behind Donald Trump.”
GOP Sen. Mitt Romney: Trump is “not suited to be president of the United States and to be the person who we hold up to our children and the world as the leader of the free world.”
GOP Sen. Todd Young: Trump “just consistently loses. In fact he has a habit of losing not just his own elections, but losing elections for others … I don’t think conservatives would be well served by electing someone whose core competency seems to be owning someone on Twitter.”
GOP Rep. David Valadao
Fmr. GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger: “It’s because of my unwavering support for democracy, that today, as a proud conservative, I am endorsing Joe Biden for reelection.”
Fmr. GOP Rep. Liz Cheney: “We cannot survive a president who is willing to torch the Constitution.”
Fmr. Georgia Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan: “It’s disappointing to watch an increasing number of Republicans fall in line behind former president Donald Trump,” saying he has “no choice but to pull the lever for Biden.”
Fmr. VP Dick Cheney: ““In our nation’s 236-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump … He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him. He is a coward. A real man wouldn’t lie to his supporters. He lost his election, and he lost big. I know it, he knows it, and deep down I think most Republicans know it.”
Fmr. RNC Chair Michael Steele: “I get it with some Republicans who say, ‘Oh, I just can’t vote for a Democrat.’ But this is not — you’re voting for your country. You’re not voting for a Democrat, in this case … I do get the idea that it is hard for some Republicans to go across the street. But baby, you need to do it … The country needs you more than your party does, trust me.”
Fmr. Trump WH Press Sec Sarah Matthews: “While I’ve never voted for a Democrat a day in my life, I would support Biden over Trump if he becomes the GOP nominee … I won’t support someone who refused to participate in a peaceful transfer of power, tried to overthrow a free and fair election, and incited a mob to attack the U.S. Capitol.”
Fmr. WH Press Sec. Stephanie Grisham: “I spent six years nonstop with Donald Trump, and I’ll tell you what: If Biden does decide to debate Trump, I would sure like to prep President Biden.”
Fmr. WH Aide Cassidy Hutchinson: “I’ve never voted for a Democrat in my life, but I would absolutely consider voting for Joe Biden this upcoming November because he will not seek to destroy our nation …He will not seek to destroy our Constitution. And he has the statesman character that we need in an elected official.”
Fmr. WH Comms Dir. Alyssa Farah Griffin: Trump “is a threat to democracy, and I will never support him.”
Fmr. WH Counsel Ty Cobb: Trump “has never cared about America, its citizens, its future or anything but himself … In fact, as history well shows from his divisive lies, as well as from his unrestrained contempt for the rule of law and his related crimes, his conduct and mere existence have hastened the demise of democracy and of the nation.”
Fmr. WH Chief of Staff John Kelly: “What’s going on in the country that a single person thinks this guy (Trump) would still be a good president when he’s said the things he’s said and done the things he’s done? … It’s beyond my comprehension he has the support he has.”
Fmr. Defense Sec. Mark Esper: “There’s no way” I’ll support Trump. Trump “is a threat to democracy.”
Fmr. VP Mike Pence: “I cannot in good conscience endorse Donald Trump in this campaign.”
Zero Fortune 100 CEOs have donated to Trump.
Paul Ryan and John Bolton both refuse to support Trump and say instead they’ll write-in another Republican… how brave of them. Can you sense my sarcasm? And Chris Christie is still all over the place. No bold font for them.
We will keep a running list on this post as it grows. Because each day, more and more Americans are speaking out about the dangers of Trump and the horrors of having him back in the White House. Which we can never let happen.
From the San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus
Struggling to understand the LGBTQIA+ meaning of the acronym? You’re not alone.
For many people who are new to the LGBTQIA+ community, this acronym can seem confusing or overwhelming.
If you are new, welcome! We’re so glad you’re here with us today.
And if you aren’t new to the community, but are curious to learn more about how the community has changed over the years, we’re delighted you’ve joined us today, too.
The way the LGBTQIA+ community interacts – both with each other and with the world around us – is constantly changing. We strive to include everyone and to make everyone feel seen and understood.
For many years, the umbrella term “gay” was used to describe the community.
Now, many people worry about how to come out, but coming out before the 1970s wasn’t even an option, as many states illegalized what they called “homosexuality” or “sodomy.” There was also no acronym at all, restricting the inclusivity of our community.
Once an acronym appeared, all versions of it began with “L” – for an important reason.
In the early days of the gay rights movement, the lesbian community often felt dismissed or rejected. This led to strong division within the community, with lesbians feeling like “second class” in the gay rights movement.
During the AIDS crisis in the 80s and 90s, thousands of gay men were disowned by their families after contracting AIDS. The lesbian community came together to care for men with this illness as members of their community.
As a gesture of gratitude for their support, the acronym was set in stone as “LGB”.
But we had a ways to go before getting to LGBTQIA+. The LGBTQIA+ meaning is being as inclusive as possible. The “T” was added to include our transgender brothers and sisters in the early 2000s, and “LGBT” was the standard for many years after that.
The “Q” was officially added in 2016, though many people had been using it for years prior.
The new letters in the LGBTQ+ acronym have been added to expand the inclusivity of our community further. No term will be perfectly inclusive, but our community wants to give everyone a voice.
As we learn more about gender and sexual expression, the LGBTQIA+ meaning and acronym will change and evolve, too. The acronym isn’t typically standardized, so some communities may add additional gender or sexual identities, especially if they’re representing a community center or non-profit dedicated to those communities. (continued)
Thanks to Ed M.
From Post Alley by David Brewster
Fifty years ago, federal Judge George Boldt issued his landmark decision on tribal fishing rights. An admirable new book, Treaty Justice, by law professor and tribal advocate Charles Wilkinson, has just been published by UW Press. There are two good reasons to read this lucid book. It is an even-handed and comprehensive primer on this vexed, core issue in the Northwest. And the entire salmon saga restores one’s faith in the legal system, just in case you are needing some good news to counter today’s problematic Supreme Court.
As the author states, the Boldt Decision of February 12, 1974 “vividly displays the brilliance and worth of the American system of justice and the moral and tangible benefits it can achieve at its heights.” Indeed the Court tried to end the raging Indian Wars of the times, established tribal sovereignty, and was a daring leap of faith in shared management of salmon fisheries.
It ranks up there in judicial boldness with the Supremes’ decisions about civil rights, school integration, old-growth protection, and voting rights. The lingering question is whether Judge Boldt, a crusty, conservative Montana Republican, bit off too much and escalated for years the war over salmon. It was reflective of an age of progressive judicial activism, now long gone. (continued)
Reload document 
Open in new tab 
