Ann Milam alerts us to an article in the NYT today. I hadn’t realized, even though I trained as an Ombudsman, that serious issues of abuse in nursing homes were prevented from going to court. But, with a new ruling, when federal dollars are being received from Medicare or Medicaid, seniors can no longer be forced into arbitration and barred from the courts. This seems only fair to me. I recently dealt with a resident in a situation where his assisted care facility simply refused to take him back after a brief hospitalization claiming he needed a higher level of care. His doctor, nurse and social worker all pleaded his case. The DSHS worker got involved and now a volunteer lawyer is involved. There needs to be a public airing and transparency and legal options when these things occur. Barring arbitration contracts in nursing homes is a significant addition to resident rights. But we need more advocates for residents to understand those rights and work with them to resolve care issues.
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 184 other subscribersQuote of the Day
more QuotesCategories
- Addiction (14)
- Advance Directives (11)
- Adventures (5)
- Advocacy (221)
- Aging Sites (149)
- Animals (145)
- Architecture (14)
- Art (137)
- artificial intelligence (1)
- Books (72)
- Business (111)
- Caregiving (16)
- CCRC Info (40)
- Civic Engagement Group (118)
- Climate (49)
- Communication (25)
- Community Engagement Group (6)
- Cooking (14)
- Crime (47)
- Dance (46)
- Dementia (85)
- Disabilities (17)
- drugs (3)
- Economics (25)
- Education (147)
- end of life (112)
- energy (2)
- Entertainment (94)
- environment (287)
- Essays (344)
- Ethics (5)
- Finance (60)
- Fitness (32)
- Food (58)
- Gardening (20)
- Gay rights/essays (1)
- Government (272)
- Grief (28)
- Guns (34)
- happiness (114)
- Health (752)
- History (295)
- Holidays (65)
- Homeless (23)
- Hospice (6)
- Housing (4)
- Humor (991)
- Immigration (3)
- In the Neighborhood (439)
- Justice (35)
- Kindness (13)
- language (3)
- Law (102)
- literature (20)
- Love (1)
- Media (39)
- Memory Loss (3)
- Mental Health (10)
- Military (25)
- Morality (6)
- Movies (13)
- Music (187)
- Nature (172)
- nutrition (1)
- Obituaries (13)
- On Stage (7)
- Opera (22)
- Organ donation (1)
- Parks (30)
- Pets (14)
- Philanthropy (17)
- Philosophy (19)
- Photography (95)
- Plants (2)
- Poetry (35)
- Politics (545)
- Poverty (13)
- prayer (8)
- Race (86)
- Recipes (1)
- Recycling (1)
- refugees (1)
- Religion (69)
- Remembrances (59)
- Retirement (15)
- Safety (58)
- Satire (44)
- Scams (32)
- Science and Technology (203)
- Shopping (9)
- Singing (1)
- Skyline Info (45)
- sleep (9)
- Social justice (170)
- Space (3)
- Spiritual (16)
- Sport (13)
- Sports (49)
- Taxes (5)
- technology (12)
- terrorism (1)
- theater (12)
- Traffic (14)
- Transportation (71)
- Travel (32)
- Uncategorized (1,277)
- Volunteering (16)
- Voting (3)
- WACCRA (7)
- War (75)
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 184 other subscribers
More advocates – “a good thing”.
A society which faces up to it’s future – a BETTER good thing.
First there was: “What to Expect when You are Expecting”.
These days, it’s: “What to Expect when You are Electing”.
Always and ever , it’s: “What to Expect when You are Aging”!
A literate, rational society we know (the US) refuses to plan together how to prevent its own exploitation. This society turns over its decision-making (and its savings) to an industry. That industry stays up nights planning…and lawyering-up.
And the next generation wrings its collective hands. Caveat Emptor! And let’s caveat BEFORE we sign those contracts!
Sylvia