Nice to hear these days

Thanks to Mary Jane F.

Posted in History, Remembrances | Comments Off on Nice to hear these days

Looking ahead!

Thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Looking ahead!

My Oh My!

Thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on My Oh My!

The dumpster

Thanks to Janet M.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The dumpster

ICE, the East Wing, Mental Health and More ….

Commentary by Heather Cox Richardson

Julia Ainsley and Didi Martinez of NBC News reported today that Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s rush to get new recruits onto the street has meant they have pushed into their training program more than 200 people who have disqualifying criminal backgrounds, fail drug testing, or don’t meet the academic or physical requirements.

The budget reconciliation measure the Republicans passed in July—the one they call the “One Big, Beautiful Bill Act”—included more than $170 billion over four years for immigration and border security. The law tripled ICE’s annual budget, giving it “more than the annual expenditures on police by state and local governments in all 50 states and the District of Columbia combined,” according to Margy O’Herron of the Brennan Center, a nonpartisan pro-democracy law and policy institute.

Part of that money was to hire about 10,000 deportation officers. As O’Herron notes, a 2017 report by the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General found that to hire 10,000 officers would require vetting 500,000 applicants. Currently, law enforcement agencies have been having trouble finding enough applicants. O’Herron notes that ICE can bypass the usual requirements for federal employees, but in the past, when the government tried to hire 5,000 Customs and Border Patrol officers quickly, the result was dramatically higher corruption rates, including for bribery by trafficking and smuggling operations.

In August, ICE began to offer a $50,000 signing bonus and got rid of its age limits. To fill the ranks, Ainsley and Martinez note, ICE has already shortened its training program from 13 weeks to 6. They report that nearly half of those dismissed from ICE over the past three months could not pass an open-book exam. Others could not run 1.5 miles in less than 14 minutes, 25 seconds, or do 15 push-ups and 32 sit-ups.

Sociologist Ian Carillo called attention to a 2020 article by political scientists Adam Scharpf and Christian Glässel looking into why secret police agents are often “surprisingly mediocre in skill and intellect.” By examining the 4,287 officers who served in autocratic Argentina from 1975 to 1983, they discovered that the ranks of secret police are filled by those who perform poorly in merit-based systems. Facing firing for their poor performance, they turn to more burdensome secret police work.

Today Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker established the “Illinois Accountability Commission” to compile evidence against federal agents who have harassed, intimidated, brutalized, and detained American citizens and legal residents in Illinois. “None of this is about crime or safety,” Pritzker said. “If it were, there would be coordination with local law enforcement and judicial warrants…. Under normal circumstances,” he said, “federal agency supervisors and inspectors general would enforce proper legal procedures and protocols and hold accountable those who violate them.” But Trump has fired 17 inspectors general and installed cronies at the Department of Justice, while MAGA congress members refuse to hold hearings or conduct oversight. Administration officials are acting as if they are “immune from investigation or accountability,” Pritzker said “They are not.”

The commission will create an official public record of “[e]very instance of abuse, or law-breaking, or…violations of rights.” While “states have limited abilities against federal immunity,” Pritzker said, “we must remind everyone that…[t]here will come a time where people of good faith are empowered to uphold the law. When the time comes, Illinois will have the testimony and the records needed to pursue justice to its fullest extent.”

Dictators also enforce loyalty by protecting those who have been found guilty of crimes in the nation’s nonpartisan justice system. Last week Trump commuted the sentence of former representative George Santos (R-NY), ending his seven-year sentence for fraud with just three months served and removing his obligation to pay $373,749.97 to the victims of his crimes. Trump has pardoned or commuted the sentences of more than 1,600 people, far more than most presidents do in four years.

Those convicted of crimes related to the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol received most of the president’s clemency, but former assistant U.S. attorney Jeffrey Toobin notes in an essay for the New York Times that Trump has been free with pardons or commutations for criminal supporters. Toobin notes Trump’s social media post after commuting Santos’s sentence: “Santos had the Courage, Conviction, and Intelligence to ALWAYS VOTE REPUBLICAN!”

Today, Trump announced a pardon for Changpeng Zhao, the founder of the Binance cryptocurrency exchange, who pleaded guilty in 2023 to money laundering, paid a $50 million fine, and served nearly four months in prison. His company paid a $4.3 billion penalty. Gram Slattery and Chris Prentice of Reuters note that in May, Binance accepted the stablecoin USD1, put out by the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial crypto venture, as payment for an investment in Binance made by an investment firm from Abu Dhabi. The deal enables World Liberty Financial to keep any profits from the $2 billion investment, likely worth tens of millions of dollars a year, and it significantly boosted the venture.

Trump’s full and unconditional pardon enables Zhao to return to the business. On social media, Zhao posted that he was “deeply grateful for today’s pardon and to President Trump for upholding America’s commitment to fairness, innovation, and justice.” He added: “Will do everything we can to help make America the Capital of Crypto.”

This afternoon, CNN’s Kaitlan Collins asked Trump about the pardon and whether it had anything to do with Zhao’s involvement in the Trump family’s cryptocurrency venture.

“Which one? Who is that?…. The recent one? Yes, the? I believe we’re talking about the same person because I do pardon a lot of people. I don’t know, he was recommended by a lot of people. A lot of people say that—are you talking about the crypto person?—A lot of people say that he wasn’t guilty of anything. He served four months in jail, and they say that he was not guilty of anything, that what he did, well, you don’t know much about crypto. You know nothing about, you know nothing about nothing. You’re fake news. But let me just tell you that he was somebody that, as I was told, I don’t know him, I don’t believe I’ve ever met him. But I’ve been told a lot of support. He had a lot of support, and they said that what he did is not even a crime. It wasn’t a crime, that he was persecuted by the Biden administration, uh, and so, I gave him a pardon at the request of a lot of very good people.”

The White House today released a list of those donating to Trump’s ballroom that he intends will replace the now-demolished East Wing of the White House. The list includes the Altria Group Inc., Amazon, Apple, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., Caterpillar Inc., Coinbase, Comcast Corporation, J. Pepe and Emilia Fanjul, Hard Rock International, Google, HP Inc., Lockheed Martin, Meta Platforms, Micron Technology, Microsoft, NextEra Energy Inc., Palantir Technologies Inc., Ripple, Reynolds American, T-Mobile, Tether America, Union Pacific Railroad, Adelson Family Foundation, Stefan E. Brodie, Betty Wold Johnson Foundation, Charles and Marissa Cascarilla, Edward and Shari Glazer, Harold Hamm, Benjamin Leon Jr., The Lutnick Family, The Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Foundation, Stephen A. Schwarzman, Konstantin Sokolov, Kelly Loeffler and Jeff Sprecher, Paolo Tiramani, Cameron Winklevoss, and Tyler Winklevoss.

Economist Robert Reich notes that the list includes “Google, whose CEO thanked Trump for [the] ‘resolution’ of an antitrust case[;] Palantir, which has lucrative contracts with ICE[; and] Blackstone’s Stephen Schwarzman, who would profit from Trump’s regulatory rollbacks for private equity.” Reich commented: “Pay-to-play.”

By definition, those who could not make it in a merit-based system and who are dependent on the good will of an authoritarian leader have neither the skill nor the priorities to deliver good government for the country.

Today economist Paul Krugman noted that the administration’s $20 billion gambit to save Trump ally Javier Milei’s government in Argentina, with another $20 billion in the works, is a visceral wake-up call for parts of rural America in a way that cuts to social welfare programs have not been, despite the fact that rural areas depend on those programs more than urban areas do. Now Trump is talking about importing beef from Argentina. Farmers were already upset that Trump’s tariff war ended Chinese imports of U.S. soybeans; now ranchers are outraged at Trump’s focus on Argentina rather than on Americans.

Trump responded by insulting them: “The Cattle Ranchers, who I love, don’t understand that the only reason they are doing so well, for the first time in decades, is because I put Tariffs on cattle coming into the United States, including a 50% Tariff on Brazil. If it weren’t for me, they would be doing just as they’ve done for the past 20 years—Terrible! It would be nice if they would understand that….”

But someone in the White House must have paid attention to yesterday’s news that a survey from the Public Religion Research Institute (PPRI), a nonpartisan independent research organization, found that 56% of Americans agree that “President Trump is a dangerous dictator whose power should be limited before he destroys American democracy,” while only 41% see him as “a strong leader who should be given the power he needs to restore America’s greatness.”

Today, after threats to send what he called a “surge”—a military term—of agents to San Francisco, Trump announced he had changed his mind. Trump attributed his change of course to “friends of mine who live in the area.”

On November 4, 2025, California voters will go to the polls to vote on Proposition 50, which would redraw the state’s congressional map to create more Democratic-dominated districts until 2030 in response to Texas’s new Republican-skewed maps.

ICE agents storming the streets of San Francisco two weeks before the vote would likely have added votes in favor of Prop 50.

Posted in Advocacy, Government, Law, Mental Health, Military, Morality | Comments Off on ICE, the East Wing, Mental Health and More ….

When My Family Lived in the White House I Resented It. Now I Mourn It.

By Patti Davis in the NYT

Ms. Davis is the author of “Dear Mom and Dad: A Letter About Family, Memory and the America We Once Knew.”

I first went into the White House when my father, Ronald Reagan, was inaugurated in January 1981. It was afternoon and I had been assigned an inaugural ball to attend later. A ball gown was waiting for me; so was a hairdresser who insisted that my hair had to be pinned up. I was the rebellious first daughter who didn’t want to be first daughter. I wanted my life back — a life that didn’t have armed agents following me and reporters writing about me, a life with no ball gowns at all.

Swept up in my own personal drama, I was blind to the much greater drama of my surroundings, the history brushing past me in the White House’s long hallways. When my family got a Cavalier King Charles spaniel named Rex, he stood near the Lincoln Bedroom barking his little head off at no one, in what my father insisted was an encounter with Lincoln’s ghost. I waited in vain for my own encounter with the ghost, so I could complain to him about all the intrusions into my life.

I visited the White House many times over those eight years, and though I could see well enough that it was a nice building, I was always counting the hours until I could leave.

Then my father left office, and it wasn’t until many years later, after his death, that I returned to the White House. My family was in Washington for the memorial, and my brother, his wife and I were offered a tour to fill the long empty morning before the service. As soon as we entered the building, through the East Wing, I felt history fold itself around me.

Everything had meaning — the feel of our footsteps on the marble floors, the thick hush amid constant activity. Our guide talked about how Franklin Roosevelt added to the East Wing in 1942, how Rosalynn Carter was the first first lady to have a formally dedicated office there. I walked through the White House as if I had never been there before because, in a way, I hadn’t. I hadn’t been present and open to the echoes of the past, to all that was left behind from those who made their mark on America, who walked those same floors, breathed that same air, looked out the same windows. I was awe-struck.

The images we’ve now all seen of the East Wing being demolished are heartbreaking. Over the centuries, many presidents have altered the White House, and certainly older buildings need to be updated and repaired. But this is complete destruction.

Among certain jaded observers, there’s been a strain of chatter dismissing the damage, saying the East Wing was never all that architecturally distinguished. But it was not just a building made of brick and plaster; it was the people’s house, a building suffused with the spirit of the ideals that built it. It was a building that invited you to look beyond your own life, your own reality, to something bigger, a huge story we all inhabit. To stand in such a place makes you feel small, yet also larger than just yourself. It makes you aware of the continuum of history in a way that feels akin to sacredness.

And now the East Wing is gone. I’m grateful that I had that chance to re-enter the White House and see it through more open eyes, experience it without my own resentments getting in the way. Now no one else will get to walk across that threshold and feel the richness of that history brush past them. It was where Eleanor Roosevelt walked. It was where Jacqueline Kennedy planned the Rose Garden.

We silence so much when we tear down places that are there to teach us, inspire us, humble us. Ghosts and memories drift away in the dust, the wreckage, and we are all poorer as a result.

Posted in Architecture, Government, History | Comments Off on When My Family Lived in the White House I Resented It. Now I Mourn It.

Own a piece of the White House?

Thanks to Pearl McE

Posted in Satire | Comments Off on Own a piece of the White House?

Medicare virtual visits on hold with shutdown

Medicare’s temporary telehealth flexibilities ended on October 1, 2025, due to a lack of Congressional action, meaning most virtual visits are no longer covered unless Congress extends them again. As a result, many healthcare providers have canceled or are rescheduling Medicare telehealth appointments, requiring patients to come in person. For patients who still have virtual appointments, a provider may ask them to sign an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN). 

What you can do

  • Check with your provider: Contact your doctor’s office to see if your appointment has been canceled or needs to be moved to an in-person visit.
  • Prepare for in-person visits: Be ready to schedule an in-person appointment if your provider requires it.
  • Understand your options: If a virtual visit is still available, you may be asked to sign an ABN, which confirms that you agree to pay for the visit out-of-pocket if Medicare does not cover it.
  • Stay informed: Visit the official Medicare.gov website for the most up-to-date information on telehealth coverage.
  • Consider other options: Explore the in-person visit options at your clinic.
  • Note: Some states have different rules. For example, Medi-Cal telehealth is not affected by this change, according to the California Medical Association

Why this is happening

  • The temporary flexibilities put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic have expired.
  • Without a new law from Congress, Medicare’s coverage reverts to the pre-pandemic rules, which only covered a limited number of telehealth services.
  • A government shutdown has prevented Congress from acting to restore these flexibilities. 
Posted in Government, Health | Comments Off on Medicare virtual visits on hold with shutdown

Oh, so close!

Thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Oh, so close!

People with some cancers live longer after a COVID vaccine

In nature 22 October 2025 (thanks to Mike C.)

Melanoma cells (artificially coloured). An immune-based therapy was more effective against this cancer in people who received an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine within 100 days of the start of their cancer treatment.Credit: Steve Gschmeissner/SPL

A vaccine that helps to fight cancer might already exist. People being treated for certain deadly cancers lived longer if they had received an mRNA-based vaccine against COVID-19 than if they hadn’t, finds an analysis of medical records.

Follow-up experiments in mice show that the vaccines have this apparent life-extending effect not because they protect against COVID-19 but because they rev up the body’s immune system1. That response increases the effectiveness of therapies called checkpoint inhibitors, the animal data suggest.

“The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine acts like a siren and activates the immune system throughout the entire body”, including inside the tumour, where it “starts programming a response to kill the cancer”, says Adam Grippin, a radiation oncologist at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, an co-author of the report published today in Nature. “We were amazed at the results in our patients.”

The findings, which Grippin and his colleagues hope to validate in a clinical trial, suggest further hidden capabilities of mRNA vaccines, even as the administration of US President Donald Trump has slashed about US$500 million in funding for research investigating the technology.

The US Department of Health and Human Services, which cancelled the funding for mRNA research, did not respond to a request for comment.

Posted in Health, Science and Technology, Vaccines | Comments Off on People with some cancers live longer after a COVID vaccine

Julio’s last at bat for 2025

Thanks to Mike C.

Posted in Sports | Comments Off on Julio’s last at bat for 2025

Prescient Pogo

Thanks to Tom S. and SRA Climate Impact Subcommittee

Posted in environment, Health, Nature, Recycling, Science and Technology | Comments Off on Prescient Pogo

Fighting Authoritarianism

Thanks to Mary Jane F.

Indivisible co-founder and co-executive director Ezra Levin joins the podcast to talk about how his group is changing under the second Trump administration, why organizing and protesting is so important, and how we can successfully fight back against authoritarianism. Plus, some thoughts on the recent ICE raids in Chicago and across the country and what these events mean for our collective rights.

Posted in Government, Politics, protests | Comments Off on Fighting Authoritarianism

The Evolution of Classical Music From 1689 to 1935

Thanks to Bob P.

Lord Vinheteiro performed a seamless piano composition that featured the evolution of classical music from 1680 through 1935. As with many of his videos, the talented musician looked straight at the camera as he played.

Posted in History, Music | Comments Off on The Evolution of Classical Music From 1689 to 1935

Peaceful Protest

Thanks to Mary Jane F.

Posted in protests | Comments Off on Peaceful Protest

She can protest too

Thanks to Pearl McE.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on She can protest too

Undaunted

MIT, with several courageous universities to follow, shows it is made of sterner stuff
by Jennifer Rubin (thanks to Diana C.)

Elite institutions ranging from Columbia University to CBS News to the Paul, Weiss law firm have capitulated to Donald Trump’s bullying. Under the delusion that they could cut deals to save themselves from Trump’s wrath, they tossed overboard supposedly deeply held values including academic independence, freedom of the press, and the right to counsel. Instead, their cowardice whetted Trump’s appetite for more aggression and repression.

Over several months, surrender by a fleet of weak-kneed institutions suggested that Trump might succeed in his dictatorial mission. However, that disturbing trend appears to have stalled. Perhaps Trump overreached, or perhaps popular protests convinced institutional leaders to show some backbone.

In any event, Trump’s familiar extortion playbook seems to have lost some of its punch. Trump’s latest gambit, the so-called compact that he sent to nine prestigious universities, may have flopped. The New York Times reported on Oct. 2:

The Trump administration promised a select set of universities what the government said would be a great deal.

In exchange for agreeing to a list of demands, like limiting international students and protecting conservative voices, universities would get a leg up on grants, potentially beating out the competition for billions in federal funds.

At least one institution, the University of Texas, said it would be eager to sign up.

But then, a curious thing happened. Faculty, students, and alumni began to push back. Condemnation of the compact and talk of boycotts started “while Dartmouth College’s president has responded by saying she will always defend her university’s ‘fierce independence,’” Johns Hopkins professor Harry Farrell wrote last week. Meanwhile, California’s governor, Gavin Newsom threatened “to pull state funding from any institution that signs.”


Then, the leader of one of the most prestigious universities weighed in. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT) president Sally Kornbluth in a letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon effectively told the Trump bullies to get lost.

Kornbluth first recited her university’s principles: rewarding merit, admitting students regardless of economic need, and guarding free expression. She then drew a line in the sand in terms that old-school conservatives would have appreciated:

We freely choose these values because they’re right, and we live by them because they support our mission—work of immense value to the prosperity, competitiveness, health and security of the United States. And of course, MIT abides by the law.

The [Trump proposed compact]… includes principles with which we disagree, including those that would restrict freedom of expression and our independence as an institution. And fundamentally, the premise of the document is inconsistent with our core belief that scientific funding should be based on scientific merit alone. (continued on Page 2 or here)

Posted in Advocacy, Government, protests | Comments Off on Undaunted

Like I-5 and the Skybridge

Thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Like I-5 and the Skybridge

Original document

Thanks to Pearl McE.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Original document

Where the #!(%&! are they?

Thanks to MaryLou P. (also the keys, phone and hearing aids)!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Where the #!(%&! are they?

I don’t think Washington understands how ticked off we truly are

By Dan Shanoff and Rafe Bartholomew in the NYT

Stephen A. Smith brought a taste of “First Take” to Washington, D.C., on Wednesday night.

The ESPN host, who has branched out into political commentary in recent months and even teased the possibility of running for president in 2028, issued a stern rebuke to the nation’s elected representatives over the ongoing federal government shutdown while participating in a cable TV town hall event for the cable network NewsNation. After he finished speaking, Smith walked off the stage for dramatic effect.

Seated alongside a bipartisan panel that included sitting lawmakers Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.), as well as former U.S. Senator Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and conservative commentator Bill O’Reilly, Smith was reacting to a question from a Dallas air traffic controller who described needing to deliver food for DoorDash in his off-duty hours to make up his lost income during the shutdown. Thousands of federal workers have been furloughed while Congress negotiates a plan to reopen the government; employees deemed essential, including air traffic controllers, are expected to work without pay.

“I’m trying to be very respectful to everybody, because they deserve it,” Smith began. “But let me say this: I don’t think Washington understands how ticked off we truly are.”

He described the issues he and the panelists had debated that night — how to make health care more affordable, the U.S. government’s financial support for Argentina amid the South American nation’s fiscal crisis, concerns over politically motivated prosecutions at the Department of Justice — and accused the government of being insensitive to the problems faced by everyday Americans, including federal workers who are missing paychecks.

“We’re listening to this kind of stuff while a young man walked up to the microphone and said that he had to leave here to go and work on DoorDash to help pay for his daughter’s tuition,” Smith said. “Meanwhile, everybody up here getting paid, but he ain’t. … This is why you have so many Americans — excuse my language — so pissed off at Washington, because somehow, some way, you get to have these conversations, engage in specific elements of it, to talk about what we need to do to get things better.

“Our debt is $37.8 trillion. Somehow, some way, the taxpayer has been paying this, been throwing money, because we all look at our check and it’s been going to the government. And somehow, some way, you’re supposed to be doing something constructive and productive enough to make sure that we don’t have that kind of deficit. It isn’t happening,” he said as members of the audience hooted whoops of approval.

“A government shutdown is going on right now,” Smith continued. “A man has to work on DoorDash when he’s really an air traffic controller that we applaud it, and we’re up here talking about how much some money is gonna cost, and the only person that don’t have a check coming is him.

“You know what I’m gonna do?” Smith asked, before standing up and leaving the stage. “I’m gonna take a break.”

Was this the debut of ‘America First Take’?

The first thing I thought of when I saw that clip of Stephen A. pop up on social media was the day in 2009 when CNBC correspondent Rick Santelli, on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, went off on a diatribe that is credited, if apocryphally, with sparking the “Tea Party” movement.

To be sure, that wasn’t this: NewsNation in 2025 isn’t CNBC in 2009 (and society isn’t remotely close to where we were 16 years ago), but if you squint, you can see the outline of “Stephen A. Populism” — a form of straight talk layered with just enough visceral disgust to match the mood of a segment of the population. (“America First Take?”)

When Smith started dabbling in politics earlier this year, he made the point that in a debate, he would clean the clock of politicians. His rhetorical skill — honed over tens of thousands of morning arguments over Dak Prescott being over- or underrated — is unquestioned.

Simply stating the obvious can leave politicians off-balance, because so many of them carry on in a media bubble where “Embrace Debate” simply doesn’t exist. It doesn’t hurt that the national mood is decidedly against members of Congress; Smith wisely picked an easy target.

Was it performative for Smith to end his monologue by stomping off the set? Absolutely. Watching the clip, I don’t doubt that he felt genuine disgust, but I also don’t doubt that he knew exactly what he was doing. This might not spark the “Stephen A. Party,” but you can spot the outline of Smith’s more muscular approach to immersing in politics. — Dan Shanoff

Posted in Finance, Government, Media, Politics | Comments Off on I don’t think Washington understands how ticked off we truly are

Somehow they crossed over

thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Somehow they crossed over

Jealousy explained

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Jealousy explained

Chaos at the CDC

from The Epidemiologist

On Friday, about 1,300 CDC employees received a surprising email: they were fired. No warning. No time to plan. Their badges were immediately deactivated. The justification was a “reduction in force”—a bureaucratic term now being used as a political pawn in the broader Congressional shutdown fight.

This wasn’t the first wave. For months, CDC employees have endured mass layoffs, political interference, the firing of top scientific leaders, a lack of transparency, and fear and uncertainty. But this round struck at the agency’s core. Senior leaders, including the incident manager for the national measles response, were let go. The entire MMWR team—the scientific backbone that translates CDC data into outbreak reports and public guidance—gone. So were epidemic intelligence service officers, the nation’s “disease detectives” who detect and track emerging threats before they spread.

It didn’t stop there. Cuts hit every corner of CDC’s operations:

  • Data office: the infrastructure that collects, connects, and analyzes data nationwide.
  • CFA INFORM: the “weather service” for infectious diseases.
  • CDC Washington Office: the bridge between science and policy.
  • Global Health Center: the front line that stops diseases abroad before they reach U.S. shores.
  • Chronic Disease Policy and Comms: connecting science to action on diabetes and heart disease.
  • Injury Prevention Policy and Comms: addressing gun violence, opioid overdoses, and suicide.
  • Ethics teams, human resources, the CDC library (it’s hard to do science without access to scientific literature), and more.

Then came the whiplash. Within 24 hours, 700 employees were reinstated. The administration called it a “coding error.” Maybe. Or maybe it was a scramble to reverse a catastrophic mistake. It’s hard to know precisely who remains fired, but it seems to include staff from ethics, congressional outreach, health statistics, nutrition surveys, and all of human resources. Oh, also, the scientists who work on biodefense, such as weaponized pathogens, remain fired.

For those keeping track, this now accounts for 1 in 3 CDC employees lost over the past few months. This doesn’t account for the 50% additional budget cuts coming in 2026.

What we’re testing in real time

The U.S. is conducting an uncontrolled experiment to see what happens when a public health agency is gutted with immense speed and without a vision beyond destruction. We are getting increasingly close to system collapse. As often attributed to Amit Kalantri: “Systems fail when people with ability don’t have authority and people with authority don’t have ability.”

The questions we’re testing are:

  1. How much trauma can the workforce absorb? Scientists have been holding the ship together after surviving mass layoffs, working under political interference, getting 500 bullets aimed at them, and mourning colleagues who lost jobs overnight. Public health employees are there for the mission (certainly not the pay), and it’s unclear how much longer that trumps trauma. Of course, cruelty is the point. In February, the OMB said, “When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work, because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down… We want to put them in trauma.”
  2. How thin can CDC be stretched? One in three employees has now been lost—either fired or quit—within months. And this is before the 2026 budget, which will cut CDC by an additional 50%.
  3. How political will CDC become? The fewer career scientists who remain, the more political appointees fill the void. Each round of cuts makes the agency less independent and more beholden to politicians.
  4. What breaks first, and how will it be felt in American lives? The ultimate question haunting many in public health, including me.

Many of you have asked how MAHA (the movement I’ve been talking with for months) is reacting. It’s complicated. Some are cheering the cuts, seeing them as long-overdue accountability for institutions that failed them. Many have been harmed or dismissed by these very systems. They feel unseen, unheard, and hungry for change. Others, though, are uneasy and recognize that the pendulum has swung too far. And many simply don’t know this is happening, because echochambers continue to drive our information ecosystems. This shouldn’t be too big a surprise, given that MAHA isn’t a monolith.

The real danger

I welcome radical transformation of our systems. They need it. But the danger here isn’t just in what’s being dismantled and how cruelly it’s being done, but in what’s not being built to take its place.

There’s no plan. No rebuilding strategy. No vision grounded in American values of innovation, imagination, and hope, nor the kind of long-term vision that could deliver the health ecosystem Americans deserve. If we don’t fill this vacuum with credible leadership, imagination, and execution, it will be filled with noise, chaos, and ideology.

What this means for you: You won’t feel these latest cuts on the ground tomorrow or the next day, especially since some cores (like the measles lead) were reinstated. But this will continue to be a slow bleed. Eventually it will be measured in American lives.

Posted in Government, Health | Comments Off on Chaos at the CDC

Prophecy in Portland?

Thanks to Pearl McE.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Prophecy in Portland?