Two regulatory rollbacks, along with a new A.I. experiment in Medicare, raise some worrisome questions.

By Paula Span in the NYT

Ed note: We should be proud of our LTC Washington State Ombudsman, Patricia Hunter, for advocating for us and pushing back on the negative moves of CMS.

Month after month, Patricia Hunter and other members of the Nursing Home Reform Coalition logged onto video calls with Congressional representatives, seeking their support for a proposed federal rule setting minimum staff levels for nursing homes.

Finally, after decades of advocacy, the Biden administration in 2023 tackled the problem of perennial understaffing of long-term care facilities. Officials backed a Medicare regulation that would mandate at least 3.48 hours of care from nurses and aides per resident, per day, and would require a registered nurse on site 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

The mandated hours were lower than supporters had hoped for, said Ms. Hunter, who directs Washington State’s long-term care ombudsman program. But “I’m a pragmatic person, so I thought, this is a good start,” she said. “It would be helpful, for enforcement, to have a federal law.”

In 2024, when the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services adopted the standards, advocates celebrated. But industry lawsuits soon blocked most provisions of the rule, with two federal district courts finding that Medicare had exceeded its regulatory authority.

And after the 2024 elections, Ms. Hunter said, “I was concerned about the changing of the guard.” Her concerns proved well-founded.

In July, as part of the Trump administration’s budget reconciliation bill, Congress prohibited Medicare from implementing the new staffing standards before 2034. Last month, C.M.S. repealed the standards altogether. They never took effect.

“It was devastating,” said Ms. Hunter.

As with environmental law and consumer protections, the Trump administration’s enthusiasm for deregulation has undone long-sought rules to improve care for the aged. And it has introduced a Medicare experiment for prior authorizations, now getting underway in six states, that has alarmed advocates, congressional Democrats and a good number of older Americans.

Taken together, the moves will affect many of the facilities and workers who provide care, and introduce complications in health coverage in several states.

On the nursing home front, “it’s clear C.M.S. has no interest in ensuring adequate staffing,” said Sam Brooks, director of public policy for the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care.

“They’re repealing a regulation that could have saved 13,000 lives a year,” he added, citing an analysis by University of Pennsylvania researchers.

Industry groups argued that nursing homes, with high rates of staff turnover, were already struggling to fill vacancies. (continued on Page 2 or here)

Posted in Aging Sites, Government, Health | Comments Off on Two regulatory rollbacks, along with a new A.I. experiment in Medicare, raise some worrisome questions.

The killing of VA ICU nurse Alex Pretti

Commentary by Heather Cox Richardson

As the nation mourned the killing of VA ICU nurse Alex Pretti yesterday at the hands of federal officials in Minneapolis, President Donald J. Trump spent last night at the White House at a black-tie private screening of a documentary about First Lady Melania Trump. Amazon paid $40 million for the rights to the film just weeks after executive chair Jeff Bezos dined with Trump at Mar-a-Lago following the former president’s reelection and is spending another $35 million to promote the film.

Then, this morning, Trump’s social media account posted a 450-word social media screed complaining about the lawsuit against his addition of a massive ballroom to the White House. Calling the National Trust for Historic Preservation a “Radical Left” organization, the account claimed that the addition “is being done with the design, consent, and approval of the highest levels of the United States Military and Secret Service. The mere bringing of this ridiculous lawsuit has already, unfortunately, exposed this heretofore Top Secret fact. Stoppage of construction, at this late date, when so much has already been ordered and done, would be devastating to the White House, our Country, and all concerned.”

This morning, administration officials doubled down on their insistence that the killing had been justified.

On CNN’s State of the Union this morning, U.S. Border Patrol commander Greg Bovino claimed the true victims of yesterday’s shooting were federal agents. He confirmed that the agents who killed Pretti yesterday remain on the streets today, though they have been reassigned elsewhere. FBI director Kash Patel claimed on the Fox News Channel that the fact Pretti was carrying a weapon proved that he was planning trouble, although because he was part of a community-led first-responder network, carrying the weapon for which he had a permit made sense.

But Americans are not buying it. They are coalescing around the idea of the American people versus an out-of-control government. As conservative lawyer George Conway put it: “I just checked—it turns out that Art. II, Sec. 1 of the Constitution of the United States does *not* say ‘The executive Power shall be vested in a bunch of sociopaths who think they can do whatever the f*ck they want and make sh*t up as they go along.’”

Reports out of Minnesota say that in the face of the terror inflicted on it by federal agents, the people there are even more closely linked together in community solidarity. They are patrolling the streets, donating food, delivering groceries, helping with legal services, organizing to look out for each other in a demonstration of community solidarity so foreign to administration figures that Attorney General Pam Bondi yesterday suggested that there was something nefarious about how well organized they are as they protect their neighbors.

In Minneapolis today, the Minnesota prison system took the extraordinary step of launching its own website to combat lies from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Its first major announcement suggested that Bovino had lied about the Border Patrol operation that was underway when agents killed Alex Pretti. The Minnesota Department of Corrections expressed its condolences to the family and loved ones of Alex Pretti and said that although Bovino claimed that the operation was targeting a man with a significant criminal history, that information was false. (continued on Page 2 or here)

In fact, the individual Bovino identified had never been in custody in Minnesota, and records showed only traffic-related offenses for him. Records did show, though, that he had been in federal immigration custody during Trump’s first administration and had been released.

Chief Brian O’Hara of the Minneapolis Police Department told Margaret Brennan of Face the Nation, “People have had enough. This is the third shooting now in less than three weeks. The Minneapolis Police Department went the entire year last year recovering about 900 guns from the street, arresting hundreds and hundreds of violent offenders, and we didn’t shoot anyone, and now this is the second American citizen that’s been killed, it’s the third shooting within three weeks…. This is not sustainable. This police department has only 600 police officers. We are stretched incredibly thin. This is taking an enormous toll, trying to manage all of this chaos on top of having to be the police department for a major city. It’s too much.”

The Minnesota National Guard made it clear which side they were on. Wearing neon vests to distinguish themselves from federal agents, they handed out doughnuts, coffee, and hot chocolate to anti-ICE protesters.

The National Basketball Players Association said it could no longer remain silent. “Now more than ever,” it said, “we must defend the right to freedom of speech and stand in solidarity with the people in Minnesota protesting and risking their lives to demand justice. The fraternity of NBA players, like the United States itself, is a community enriched by its global citizens, and we refuse to let the flames of division threaten the civil liberties that are meant to protect us all. The NBPA and its members extend our deepest condolences to the families of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, just as our thoughts remain focused on the safety and well-being of all members of our community.”

The newest killing has opened up a rift in Republican ranks. Administration officials not allied with Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and her cronies are complaining to reporters, including Bill Melugin of the Fox News Channel, that they are frustrated with DHS officials’ statements that Pretti was intending a “massacre” of federal agents in the face of videos that disprove such absurd claims. They have told Melugin such comments are “catastrophic.” “[W]e are losing this war,” sources say, “we are losing the base and the narrative.”

Indeed, at the base level of politics, MAGA supporters who support gun ownership are appalled by statements like that of FBI director Kash Patel, who told the Fox News Channel’s Maria Bartiromo, “You cannot bring a firearm loaded with multiple magazines to any sort of protest that you want. It’s that simple. You don’t have the right to break the law and incite violence.” But Pretti had a license to carry a weapon, and he did not brandish it. President Rob Doar of the Minnesota Gun Owners Law Center noted that Pretti had the right to carry a gun in that situation and that it shouldn’t be necessary “to choose between exercising your First Amendment rights or your Second Amendment rights.” He expressed concern that “our government and agents of our government are not engaging in good faith with what we’re seeing with our own eyes.”

Lawyer John Mitnick, who served as deputy counsel of the Homeland Security Council from its inception during the George W. Bush administration and then served as general counsel of the United States Department of Homeland Security from 2018 to 2019, when he clashed with Stephen Miller, wrote on social media: “I helped to establish DHS in 2002 and 2003 and later had the homeland security portfolio as a White House Counsel and served as General Counsel of the Department. I am enraged and embarrassed by DHS’s lawlessness, fascism, and cruelty. Impeach and remove Trump—now.”

Aside from a few strong MAGA voices, elected Republicans appeared reluctant to defend the killing. Neither Senate majority leader John Thune (R-SD) nor House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) commented on it.

Vermont’s Republican governor Phil Scott did, though, leading the way for other Republicans in districts that are sliding away from MAGA. In a statement, he said: “Enough…It’s not acceptable for American citizens to be killed by federal agents for exercising their God-given and constitutional rights to protest their government. At best, these federal immigration operations are a complete failure of coordination of acceptable public safety and law enforcement practices, training, and leadership. At worst, it’s a deliberate federal intimidation and incitement of American citizens that’s resulting in the murder of Americans…. The president should pause these operations, de-escalate the situation, and reset the federal government’s focus on truly criminal illegal immigrants. In the absence of presidential action, Congress and the courts must step up to restore constitutionality.”

G. Elliot Morris of Strength in Numbers noted today that even the Republican-leaning Rasmussen polls have shown that 59% of Americans disapprove of Trump’s handling of immigration, while only 39% approve. In Strength in Numbers today, he reported that “Trump’s 2024 coalition has come undone.” He explained that “[y]oung voters, non-white voters, and low-turnout voters who swung to Trump from 2020 to 2024 have swung back against him in force. In many cases, these groups are even more anti-Trump now than they were ahead of the 2020 election.”

Morris also noted that Trump’s approval rating is not underwater in ten of the states he won in 2024, as I wrote last night. It’s underwater in fifteen.

Today the editorial boards of both Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal and his New York Post urged the administration to pause its ICE operations in Minneapolis after the killing of Alex Pretti. The Wall Street Journal’s famously right-wing editorial board warned that “[t]he Trump Administration spin on this simply isn’t believable.” It continued: “Ms. Noem and Mr. Miller aren’t credible spokesmen. Their social-media and cable-TV strategy is to own the libs, rather than to persuade Americans. This is backfiring against Republicans…. Mr. Miller’s mass deportation methods are turning immigration, an issue Mr. Trump owned in 2024, into a political liability for Republicans in 2026. Americans don’t want law enforcement shooting people in the street or arresting five-year-old boys.”

Tonight, the editorial board of the New York Post warned that Trump’s ICE actions in Minneapolis are “backfiring.” “Swing voters…see US citizens dying at federal agents’ hands, and recoil in horror.” It concluded: “Mr. President, the American people didn’t vote for these scenes and you can’t continue to order them to not believe their lying eyes.”

Trump’s social media account turned defensive tonight. After repeating Trump’s false claim that he had won election in a historic landslide (in reality, he won less than 50% of the vote), it blamed Democrats for the chaos ICE and CBP agents have caused in Democratic-led cities. It demanded that every Democratic mayor and governor cooperate with the administration to “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Yesterday, after Alex Pretti’s death, the son of a man Pretti had cared for at the VA hospital published a video of Pretti speaking at his father’s deathbed. “Today we remember that freedom is not free,” Pretti said. “We have to work at it, nurture it, protect it, and even sacrifice for it. May we never forget and always remember our brothers and sisters who have served so that we may enjoy the gift of freedom. So in this moment, we remember and give thanks for their dedication and selfless service to our nation in the cause of our freedom. In this solemn hour, we [give] them our honor, and our gratitude.”

Posted in Advocacy, Crime, Essays, Government, Grief, Guns, Immigration, Justice, Kindness, Law, Media, Mental Health, Morality, prayer, protests, Social justice, terrorism | Comments Off on The killing of VA ICU nurse Alex Pretti

Crosslake Update: Mark your calendar for opening day!

A Link light rail train travels across the I-90 Bridge.

It’s official: Link 2 Line service across Lake Washington begins in March.

By Sound Transit (thanks to Ed M.)

The 2 Line’s highly anticipated Crosslake Connection between Seattle and the Eastside will transform how we travel around the region for generations to come, and it all begins Saturday, March 28.  

The remaining section of the East Link Extension crosses Lake Washington via the I-90 floating bridge, and it includes two new stations at Mercer Island and Judkins Park.  

Opening this critical segment of the 2 Line will dramatically improve quality of life for thousands of daily riders, connecting Eastside communities with the regional “spine” of 1 Line service from Lynnwood to Federal Way. Crosslake service will complete the ST2 transit expansion that voters approved in 2008 and expand the regionwide light rail network to more than 63 miles of fast, frequent and affordable Link service. 

A view of Lake Washington and Mount Rainier.
Our region affords some stunning views from transit, and the 2 Line’s Crosslake Connection will raise the bar even further. Bring your camera and join us for opening day on March 28.

The Crosslake Connection will also allow us to double current frequency (trains will arrive every 4 minutes during peak hours) at 14 stations in the busiest part of the system, from downtown Seattle to Lynnwood.  

Link operators have been “interlining” test trains for several months to prepare for the 2 Line connecting with the 1 Line at International District/Chinatown Station.  

A map of the full 2 Line from downtown Redmond to Lynnwood.
Once the Crosslake Connection opens this spring, the full Link 2 Line will stretch more than 35 miles from downtown Redmond to Lynnwood and connect with the 1 Line in downtown Seattle.

We know how excited transit users across the region are for this once-in-a-generation milestone, and we can’t wait to welcome you aboard on March 28.  

Festivities will include a ribbon cutting ceremony, activities, exhibits, entertainment and prizes at multiple stations throughout the day.

Be sure to bookmark soundtransit.org/crosslake and stay tuned for more details on the celebration, coming soon. You can also sign up for East Link project updates via email or text, and follow Sound Transit on social media for the latest. 

https://www.soundtransit.org/media/oembed?url=https%3A//www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D-tImk5T3iiU&max_width=854&max_height=480&hash=XRV7W3JUCLinrtoDQYsK1cFO10KFEBCGq6meuqaVueE

Sound Transit’s award-winning design for adding light rail to a floating bridge is the first of its kind in the world. Go behind the scenes with design and construction experts to see how it was done.

Posted in Adventures, Government, technology, Traffic, Transportation | Comments Off on Crosslake Update: Mark your calendar for opening day!

Email scam

A resident asked me to post a reminder about a recent scam attempt. If you receive an email from a friend asking if you shop at Amazon, lend some money–and saying they are sick (plus you can imagine other disorienting requests)–this type of email should alert you with virtual red flashing lights that it’s likely a scam. If there’s a link, don’t click on it because it could introduce malware in to your computer.

The best thing to do if you can, is to call the individual and ask them about the email. Then they can get appropriate tech help to address the issue.

It’s sad, but there are some nasty players out there with ingenious scams who may say that they are the IRS, your bank, the police, etc.–then escalate threats. Don’t fall for this. Ask for trusted help. So in general, visit only trusted sites on the web.

Posted in Scams | Comments Off on Email scam

A Simple Proposal for the Legal Profession to Regain Its Dignity

By Shira A. Scheindlin and John Jones III — in the New York Times (Jan 19, 2026)

Ms. Scheindlin is a former judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Mr. Jones is a former chief judge of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Last year was not the proudest year for the American legal profession. The Trump administration took unconscionable and manifestly illegal measures against law firms that had represented clients and causes the administration disliked. In response, several large firms made deals to eliminate diversity efforts and agreed to provide nearly $1 billion of free legal services to causes favored by the government. While a handful of firms fought back and won, most simply remained silent, no doubt wary of making themselves a target of political ire.

As federal judges who have retired after more than five combined decades on the bench, we have no such professional concerns. But we have seen firsthand how fragile the rule of law is, and how powerful the pressure from the federal government can be. We have joined together with dozens of retired federal district and appellate judges who were appointed by presidents of both parties to defend the legal profession. Today, we offer a set of principles of legal independence, a reaffirmation of values and obligations designed to guide and to strengthen law firms, bar associations, law schools, businesses and nonprofits.

In 1977, the Rev. Leon Sullivan wrote what came to be known as the Sullivan Principles, a set of ethical guidelines for corporations operating in apartheid-era South Africa. Many American corporations adopted these principles, including equal pay, to signal to their customers, competitors and employees their unwillingness to abide by the nation’s brutal system of discrimination. These principles were an important recognition that private institutions are complicit if they do not resist unjust policies. Some companies and organizations went further, choosing to divest entirely. By the late 1990s, the apartheid government had been toppled, replaced by a functional democracy.

A set of ethical principles adopted by all members of the American legal profession could similarly help protect our democracy.

The principles, which we have posted in full online, call on lawyers and their organizations to reinforce the most basic professional commitments. That starts with something that federal courts have already affirmed: Representing clients, donating to causes they support and expressing beliefs regarding the value of equal opportunity are activities protected by the First Amendment. We have a right to pursue them free from government coercion or retaliation.

Beyond that, the principles declare that lawyers and their organizations have a duty to challenge government actions when clients’ interests require it. We have a duty to help individuals or groups that can’t afford counsel — and donating our services to wealthy and powerful clients does not count. We must work to promote public confidence in the integrity of the legal process through all our actions, including being both truthful and candid. And we must refuse demands that would require us to violate any of these obligations.

Judges rely on lawyers to present facts, identify legal questions and speak candidly about their clients’ interests. In an environment in which sitting judges increasingly face threats to their independence and their safety, lawyers play an essential role in preserving a reliable forum for the peaceful settlement of disputes. Yet as many around the world now recognize, the administration’s actions and the response of several prominent firms have placed that forum in danger.

For major American law firms, the issue is a practical one as well. Many top law students are reluctant to join firms that have failed to defend their independence. Experts in legal ethics and some bar associations have criticized the deals that firms struck with the government. The damage to those firms’ reputations will far outlast this administration. Members of Congress have already begun investigations into the legality of the agreements. A letter signed by 16 members of Congress warned one of those firms that its “agreement may seriously hinder your firm’s ability to zealously advocate for your clients in matters that conflict with the administration’s priorities, and thus also pose a threat of disbarment for your attorneys.” And several major corporations have either moved work away from firms that cut deals, or sent new work to firms that didn’t.

For all but the most powerful firms, however, the cost of speaking out may simply be too high. That’s why these principles should be adopted unanimously. We are stronger when we act together. We encourage all firms and attorneys to endorse these principles publicly, by proudly affixing their signatures to the principles online. Doing so will enable our profession to show law firms, lawyers, law students, clients, courts and all those watching that the United States legal profession remains a model for the world. That should be a common goal for all who hold dear the rule of law, and the democracy on which it is based.

Posted in Ethics, Government, Law | Comments Off on A Simple Proposal for the Legal Profession to Regain Its Dignity

More reasons to get the Shingrix and RSV vaccines

Summary from ChatGPT

Here’s a clear, evidence-based summary of what we **currently know — and don’t know — about “anti-aging” and dementia protection with the Shingrix (shingles) and RSV vaccines:


🧠 1. Shingrix (Shingles Vaccine)

Dementia Risk & Brain Protection

Emerging research suggests that the Shingrix shingles vaccine is associated with lower rates of dementia in older adults:

  • Large observational studies have found that adults who received the recombinant shingles vaccine had a lower incidence of dementia diagnoses over follow-up periods (e.g., ~17% reduction in dementia risk and longer dementia-free time) compared with people who received older shingles vaccines or other vaccines.
  • Other analyses show associations between shingles vaccination and decreased risk of dementia compared with no vaccination at all.
  • A recent Oxford University analysis reported that both shingles and RSV vaccines with the AS01 adjuvant were tied to lower dementia diagnoses, suggesting this immune-boosting component may be important.

Important caveats:
• These are observational associations — not definitive proof of causation. Researchers call for randomized trials to confirm whether these effects are truly due to the vaccine itself.
• Mechanisms are not fully understood, though reduced viral reactivation and changes in immune response are leading hypotheses.

Anti-Aging / Biological Aging Effects

Beyond dementia, some early studies have looked at broader biological aging markers:

  • A recent study found shingles vaccination was associated with slower markers of biological aging — such as reduced chronic inflammation and slower epigenetic changes — in older adults.
  • Lower chronic inflammation and improved immune measures are factors linked with healthier aging in general, but direct proof that the vaccine “slows aging” in humans is still preliminary.

Summary for Shingrix:
✔ Strong vaccine for shingles prevention.
✔ Observational evidence suggests lower dementia risk in vaccinated older adults.
✔ Early evidence hints at healthier biological aging markers, but this isn’t definitive proof of an anti-aging effect.


🧠 2. RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) Vaccines

Dementia Protection

Recent research from the University of Oxford and related studies indicates that RSV vaccines containing the same immune-boosting adjuvant (AS01) as Shingrix are also associated with reduced dementia incidence:

  • Adults 60+ who received an adjuvanted RSV vaccine had about a 29% lower diagnosis rate of dementia in the following ~18 months compared with people who received non-AS01 vaccines (e.g., flu shots).

This supports the idea that certain vaccines may have a broader effect on immune function that correlates with brain health, beyond preventing the specific target infection.

Anti-Aging Evidence

There is no specific published evidence yet showing RSV vaccines directly affect biological aging markers (like epigenetic age or inflammation) in the same way that some studies have for shingles vaccines. RSV research primarily focuses on disease prevention and immune response.


🧠 Why Researchers Think These Effects Might Occur

There are a few leading theories — none of them proven yet:

1️⃣ Reduced harmful infections/inflammation
• Preventing shingles or RSV may reduce chronic inflammation (“inflammaging”), which is thought to contribute to neurodegeneration and other aging-related declines.

2️⃣ Immune system modulation
• The AS01 adjuvant used in both Shingrix and some RSV vaccines stimulates innate immune cells. Some scientists speculate this could lead to broader immune benefits that protect the brain.

3️⃣ Prevention of viral reactivation
• Shingles arises from reactivation of the chickenpox virus in nerve cells; preventing that might lessen nerve inflammation, which could hypothetically lower dementia risk.


🧠 Key Takeaways

AspectShingrixRSV Vaccines
Primary purposePrevent shinglesPrevent RSV lower respiratory disease
Dementia protection evidenceMultiple observational studies show a lower risk after vaccinationObservational evidence shows lower dementia diagnoses with adjuvanted RSV vaccines
Anti-aging effectsEmerging signals linked to slower biological aging markersNo direct data yet on biological aging
Level of proofObservational (not yet causal)Observational (not yet causal)

🧠 Final Notes

• Both vaccines are valuable first and foremost for preventing shingles and RSV (especially in older adults).
• The dementia and anti-aging associations are intriguing but not yet proven causal — scientists are actively studying these links.
• If brain health preservation is a priority, keeping up with recommended adult vaccinations (shingles, RSV, influenza, etc.) might offer added benefits beyond infection prevention, though exact mechanisms and the size of benefits remain under study.

Posted in Aging Sites, Dementia, Health, Vaccines | 2 Comments

Ta Da!

Thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Ta Da!

Greetings from Saroj

Ed note: Such a wonderful surprise to hear from Saroj who’s now serving as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Macedonia! Please scroll down on the document to see the full note and her beautiful pictures. For those of you who weren’t here when Saroj worked with us in the fitness programs, she exemplified the wonderful care we receive from so many Skyline staffers. (This note was posted with her permission)

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Posted in Adventures, Caregiving, Communication, Essays, Fitness, Kindness, Skyline Info | Comments Off on Greetings from Saroj

Resources about ICE for Parents and Guardians

This list of resources has been provided by several local schools: (thanks to Sylvia P.)

Posted in Advocacy, Government, Immigration | Comments Off on Resources about ICE for Parents and Guardians

Shingles vaccine may slow biological aging in older adults

by Laine Bergeson at Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota (thanks to Ed M.)

woman getting vaccinated

In addition to helping protect against a painful viral illness, the shingles (herpes zoster) vaccine may help slow biological aging in older adults, according to a new observational study by researchers at the University of Southern California (USC) Leonard Davis School of Gerontology. Biological age differs from chronological age in that it reflects how well the body’s tissues and organ systems are working. 

The findings, published today in The Journals of Gerontology Series A, draw on data from the nationally representative US Health and Retirement Study and look at multiple markers of biological aging in 3,884 adults aged 70 years and older in 2016. 

After accounting for demographic and health differences, those who had received the shingles vaccine exhibited signs of slower biological aging, such as lower levels of inflammation and slower epigenetic aging, than those who had not been vaccinated. Epigenetic changes are changes in how cells behave over time.

The researchers looked at seven different individual markers of biological aging: inflammation, innate and adaptive immunity, immune function, cardiovascular function, neurodegeneration, epigenetic and transcriptomic (genetic expression and regulation) aging, and composite biological aging.

Less inflammation, enhanced immunity

The shingles vaccine was significantly associated with less inflammation, slower epigenetic changes, and a lower overall composite biological aging score. Vaccination was also tied to increased immunity. 

The “epigenetic, transcriptomic and overall composite biological aging improvements were most pronounced within three years post-vaccination, with slower aging persisting beyond this window,” write the researchers. “The results support the hypothesis that shingles vaccination may influence key biological systems relevant to aging.”

Chronic, low-grade inflammation is implicated in numerous age-related conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and cognitive decline. “By helping to reduce this background inflammation—possibly by preventing reactivation of the virus that causes shingles—the vaccine may play a role in supporting healthier aging,” said Jung Ki Kim, PhD, research associate professor of gerontology and the study’s first author, in a USC press release

The results support the hypothesis that shingles vaccination may influence key biological systems relevant to aging.

The study had some limitations. Because the data were cross-sectional, the researchers were unable to draw conclusions about change over time. They also note that the relationship between vaccine responses and inflammation may be bidirectional, meaning that lower baseline inflammation can improve vaccine responses, and that other unmeasured confounders might exist. 

Coauthor Eileen Crimmins, PhD, AARP chair in gerontology, emphasized that, while more research is needed, the results are compelling. “Our study adds to a growing body of work suggesting that vaccines may play a role in healthy aging strategies beyond solely preventing acute illness,” she said in the release. 

Posted in Aging Sites, Vaccines | Comments Off on Shingles vaccine may slow biological aging in older adults

How to strengthen your immune system

Katelyn JetelinaEdward Nirenberg, and Hannah Totte, MPH in Your Local Epidemiologist

Ed note: You might find it surprising that sleep is so important to strengthening the immune system. FYI, a sleep specialist, Dr. Brandon Peters-Mathews will be giving a presentation here at 11 AM on Friday June 6th in the MBR. So don’t sleep in that day!

We’re in the middle of a rough respiratory season. So naturally, everywhere you turn online, someone is offering advice on how to “boost your immune system.” The problem is that good science and bad advice are all tangled together on social media and podcasts, making it hard to know what actually works.

While vaccines are among our most powerful tools to reduce the risk of infection, and antivirals can slow how fast viruses multiply, most infections don’t have treatments or vaccines. So what else can you do?

Here’s what helps, what doesn’t, and why. And if you’re already feeling crummy, we hope this helps a little.

Mom was right: the basics still matter

It turns out the advice many of us heard growing up still holds up.

Sleep is among the most powerful tools we have for immune support. While you’re asleep, your immune system:

  • Suppresses chronic inflammation that weakens your ability to fight off infections.
  • Helps coordinate where your immune cells go in the body.
  • Trains immune cells to recognize germs.

Sleep especially affects natural killer cells, which are part of your body’s first line of defense against viruses. It also helps B cells and T cells—the immune system’s “memory”—learn what different viruses look like and how to respond faster next time. Sleep has also been shown experimentally to significantly affect the strength of your immune response to vaccines and your susceptibility to certain infections.

The problem is that about one-third of adults don’t get nearly enough sleep (see sleep recommendations below). When sleep is cut short, the immune system becomes less effective and inflammation rises, which can increase the risk of infections and long-term health problems. It’s best to get at least 7 hours of sleep each night.

How much sleep is enough? Source: American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) recommendations that the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has endorsed

Note: Unfortunately, many medications that aid in sleep disrupt the amount of time you spend in specific stages of sleep, which means that they might not allow you to get the full benefits of sleep for your immune system.

Humidity doesn’t directly strengthen your immune system, but it can make a big difference in how you feel:

The opposite is also true: drier air has been shown to exacerbate respiratory symptoms. One important point: if you are using a humidifier, make sure it stays clean.

A nutrient-rich diet matters too, especially one rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean proteins, and healthy oils. While most nutrition research focuses on conditions like heart disease and stroke, these dietary patterns are also valuable for the immune system.

The clearest is around fiber. Most adults eat less than half of the recommended daily fiber intake. Fiber feeds your “good” gut bacteria, which work to reduce systemic inflammation. There is one important exceptionsome individuals who have inflammatory bowel disease, like Crohn’s or ulcerative colitis, can have a worsening of their disease if they consume too much fiber.

Homing in on home remedies

Vitamin D gets a lot of attention. It does help immune cells do their jobs and keeps inflammation from getting out of control. Deficiency can increase the risk of infections, BUT true deficiency in the U.S. is much less common than many have been led to believe.

There’s a really complicated history to the guidance on what Vitamin D levels people need. The latest guidelines from the Endocrine Society broadly align with the Institute of Medicine’s previous work, which found that 20 ng/mL is sufficient to meet the needs of 97.5% of the U.S., though lower values may also achieve this. In a recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, vitamin D supplementation did not have a clear benefit for reducing the risk of respiratory infections compared with placebo.

Different recommendations for serum Vitamin D levels. Red=severe deficiency. Source: https://rdcu.be/eX2l1

Zinc is another common remedy. Your body needs zinc to activate certain immune cells, especially T cells. If taken early, zinc may slightly shorten the duration of a cold or reduce symptom severity. But it comes with downsides: nausea, bad taste, and, with nasal sprays, even loss of smell. Zinc does not prevent colds, despite early lab studies that suggested it might.

Vitamin C. A balanced diet can readily obtain the necessary levels to support immune function. There are many misconceptions about megadosing vitamin C for sickness, stemming from a book published in the 1970s and supercharged by claims about its benefits for the common cold. In addition, some animal studies and small but poorly conducted human studies are often cited as proof. But, Vitamin C deficiency is uncommon, and megadosing doesn’t show compelling evidence of preventing colds or accelerating resolution.

Some notes on vitamins:

  • Taking too much of a vitamin (i.e., megadosing) can be toxic. For Vitamin D, this risk is particularly concerning for children (especially babies), people with certain medical conditions, and those taking certain medications. For Vitamin C, the main risk of megadosing is kidney stones.
  • They aren’t regulated for safety or efficacy. This means that even if you’re buying the same exact supplement from the same exact company, there is variability in the quality and formulation.
  • The placebo effect is real. For example, in a randomized control study of multivitamins, the intervention group reported better health despite no apparent differences in health outcomes.

Nasal saline, whether in sprays or neti pots, can be surprisingly helpful when you’re sick. Studies show it can shorten symptom duration and make congestion easier to manage by clearing mucus from the nasal passages. Nasal saline doesn’t prevent infection, but it can make illness more manageable. Just be sure to use distilled or purified water.

Cold plunges or ice baths are increasingly popular for “boosting” immunity, but there is inconclusive evidence from small, conflicting studies. For example, one study of ten athletes observed a small increase in white blood cell counts after multiple cold plunges in a row (which one could argue may aid immune function), but another study found no effect. One randomized control trial in the Netherlands found cold plunges reduced sickness absences from work by 30%, but not the number of days of feeling crummy.

Bottom line

We have a few tools to help prevent and treat viral illnesses. However, the best tool we have is our immune system. Our body does a great job of keeping that in tip-top shape without fads. Stay healthy out there!

Love, YLE, Ed and Hannah

Posted in Health | Comments Off on How to strengthen your immune system

A humble radical

Thanks to Pam P.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A humble radical

A Superpower is Dying by Suicide

Commentary by Heather Cox Richardson

Late last night, Nick Schifrin of PBS NewsHour posted on social media that the staff of the U.S. National Security Council had sent to European ambassadors in Washington a message that President Donald J. Trump had already sent to Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre of Norway. The message read:

“Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT”

Faisal Islam of the BBC voiced the incredulity rippling across social media in the wake of Schifrin’s post, writing: “Even by the standards of the past week, like others, I struggle to comprehend how the below letter on Greenland/Nobel might be real, although it appears to come from the account of a respected PBS journalist… this is what I meant by beyond precedent, parody and reality….” Later, Islam confirmed on live TV that the letter was real and posted on X: “Incredible… the story is actually not a parody.”

International affairs journalist Anne Applebaum noted in The Atlantic the childish grammar in the message, and pointed out—again—that the Norwegian Nobel Committee is not the same thing as the Norwegian government, and neither of them is Denmark, a different country. She also noted that Trump did not, in fact, end eight wars, that Greenland has been Danish for centuries, that many “written documents” establish Danish sovereignty there, that Trump has done nothing for NATO, and that European NATO members increased defense spending out of concern over Russia’s increasing threat.

This note, she writes, “should be the last straw.” It proves that “Donald Trump now genuinely lives in a different reality, one in which neither grammar nor history nor the normal rules of human interaction now affect him. Also, he really is maniacally, unhealthily obsessive about the Nobel Prize.” Applebaum implored Republicans in Congress “to stop Trump from acting out his fantasy in Greenland and doing permanent damage to American interests.” “They owe it to the American people,” she writes, “and to the world.”

Former Vice President Dick Cheney’s doctor Jonathan Reiner agreed: “This letter, and the fact that the president directed that it be distributed to other European countries, should trigger a bipartisan congressional inquiry into presidential fitness.”

Today three top American Catholic cardinals, Blase Cupich of Chicago, Robert McElroy of Washington, D.C., and Joseph Tobin of Newark, New Jersey, issued a joint statement warning the Trump administration that its military action in Venezuela, threats against Greenland, and cuts to foreign aid risk bringing vast suffering to the world. Nicole Winfield and Giovanna Dell’Orto of the Associated Press reported that the cardinals spoke up after a meeting at the Vatican in which several fellow cardinals expressed alarm about the administration’s actions. Cupich said that when the U.S. can be portrayed as saying “‘might makes right’—that’s a troublesome development. There’s the rule of law that should be followed.”

“We are watching one of the wildest things a nation-state has ever done,” journalist Garrett Graff wrote: “A superpower is [dying by] suicide because the [Republican] Congress is too cowardly to stand up to the Mad King. This is one of the wildest moments in all of geopolitics ever.”

In just a year since his second inauguration, Trump has torn apart the work that took almost a century of struggle and painstaking negotiations from the world’s best diplomats to build. Since World War II, generations of world leaders, often led by the United States, created an international order designed to prevent future world wars. They worked out rules to defend peoples and nations from the aggressions of neighboring countries, and tried to guarantee that global trade, bolstered by freedom of the seas, would create a rising standard of living that would weaken the ability of demagogues to create loyal followings.

In August 1941, four months before the U.S. entered World War II, U.S. president Franklin Delano Roosevelt and British prime minister Winston Churchill and their advisors laid out principles for an international system that could prevent future world wars. In a document called the Atlantic Charter, they agreed that countries should not invade each other and therefore the world should work toward disarmament, and that international cooperation and trade thanks to freedom of the seas would help to knit the world together with rising prosperity and human rights.

The war killed about 36.5 million Europeans, 19 million of them civilians, and left many of those who had survived homeless or living in refugee camps. In its wake, in 1945, representatives of the 47 countries that made up the Allies in World War II, along with the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, and newly liberated Denmark and Argentina, formed the United Nations as a key part of an international order based on rules on which nations agreed, rather than the idea that might makes right, which had twice in just over twenty years brought wars that involved the globe.

Four years later, many of those same nations came together to resist Soviet aggression, prevent the revival of European militarism, and guarantee international cooperation across the Atlantic Ocean. France, the U.K., Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg formed a defensive military alliance with the U.S., Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark, and Iceland to make up the twelve original signatories to the North Atlantic Treaty. In it, the countries that made up the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) reaffirmed “their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments” and their determination “to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law.”

They vowed that any attack on one of the signatories would be considered an attack on all, thus deterring war by promising strong retaliation. This system of collective defense has stabilized the world for 75 years. Thirty-two countries are now members, sharing intelligence, training, tactics, equipment, and agreements for use of airspace and bases. In 2024, NATO countries reaffirmed their commitment and said Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had “gravely undermined global security.”

And therein lies the rub. The post–World War II rules-based international order prevents authoritarians from grabbing land and resources that belong to other countries. But Russia’s president Vladimir Putin, for example, is eager to dismantle NATO and complete his grab of Ukraine’s eastern industrial regions.

Trump has taken the side of rising autocrats and taken aim at the rules-based international order with his insistence that the U.S. must control the Western Hemisphere. In service to that plan, he has propped up Argentina’s right-wing president Javier Milei and endorsed right-wing Honduran president Nasry Asfura, helping his election by pardoning former president Juan Orlando Hernández, a leading member of Asfura’s political party, who was serving 45 years in prison in the U.S. for drug trafficking. Trump ousted Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro and seized control of much of Venezuela’s oil, the profits of which are going to an account in Qatar that Trump himself controls.

This week, Trump has launched a direct assault on the international order that has stabilized the world since 1945. He is trying to form his own “Board of Peace,” apparently to replace the United Nations. A draft charter for that institution gives Trump the presidency, the right to choose his successor, veto power over any actions, and control of the $1 billion fee permanent members are required to pay. In a letter to prospective members, Trump boasted that the Board of Peace is “the most impressive and consequential Board ever assembled,” and that “there has never been anything like it!” Those on it would, he said, “lead by example, and brilliantly invest in a secure and prosperous future for generations to come.”

The Kremlin says Putin, whose war on Ukraine has now lasted almost four years and who has been shunned from international organizations since his indictment by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, has received an invitation to that Board of Peace. So has Putin’s closest ally, President Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus, who Ivana Kottasová and Anna Chernova of CNN note has been called “Europe’s last dictator.” Also invited are Hungary’s prime minister and Putin ally Viktor Orbán as well as Javier Milei.

And now Trump is announcing to our allies that he has the right to seize another country.

Trump’s increasing frenzy is likely coming at least in part from increasing pressure over the fact the Department of Justice is now a full month past the date it was required by law to release all of the Epstein files. Another investigation will be in the news as well, as former special counsel Jack Smith testifies publicly later this week about Trump’s role in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Smith told the House Judiciary Committee in December that he believed a jury would have found Trump guilty on four felony counts related to his actions.

Smith knows what happened, and Trump knows that Smith knows what happened.

Trump’s fury over the Nobel Peace Prize last night was likely fueled as well by the national celebration today of an American who did receive that prize: the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. The Nobel Prize Committee awarded King the prize in 1964 for his nonviolent struggle for civil rights for the Black population in the U.S. He accepted it “with an abiding faith in America and an audacious faith in the future of mankind,” affirming what now seems like a prescient rebuke to a president sixty years later, saying that “what self-centered men have torn down men other-centered can build up.”

Trump did not acknowledge Martin Luther King Jr. Day this year.

While the walls are clearly closing in on Trump’s ability to see beyond himself, he and his loyalists are being egged on in their demand for the seizure of Greenland by White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who is publicly calling for a return to a might-makes-right world. On Sean Hannity’s show on the Fox News Channel today, Miller ignored the strength of NATO in maintaining global security as he insisted only the U.S. could protect Greenland.

He also ignored the crucial fact that the rules-based international order has been instrumental in increasing U.S.—as well as global—prosperity since 1945. With his claim that “American dollars, American treasure, American blood, American ingenuity is what keeps Europe safe and the free world safe,” Miller is erasing the genius of the generations before us. It is not the U.S. that has kept the world safe and kept standards of living rising: it is our alliances and the cooperation of the strongest nations in the world, working together, to prevent wannabe dictators from dividing the world among themselves.

Miller is not an elected official. Appointed by Trump and with a reasonable expectation that Trump will pardon him for any crimes he commits, Miller is insulated both from the rule of law and, crucially, from the will of voters. The Republican congress members Applebaum called on to stop Trump are not similarly insulated.

Tonight Danish troops—the same troops who stood shoulder to shoulder with U.S. troops in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2021—arrived in Greenland to defend the island from the United States of America.

Posted in Communication, Dementia, Economics, energy, Essays, Ethics, Government, History, Justice, Kindness, Law, Mental Health, Morality, Politics, protests, Social justice, War | Comments Off on A Superpower is Dying by Suicide

Let’s melt the ICE

Thanks to Bob P.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Let’s melt the ICE

Martin Luther King, Jr.’s final speech – I’ve been to the Mountaintop

delivered 3 April 1968, Mason Temple (Church of God in Christ Headquarters), Memphis, Tennessee

Thank you very kindly, my friends. As I listened to Ralph Abernathy and his eloquent and generous introduction and then thought about myself, I wondered who he was talking about. It’s always good to have your closest friend and associate to say something good about you. And Ralph Abernathy is the best friend that I have in the world. I’m delighted to see each of you here tonight in spite of a storm warning. You reveal that you are determined to go on anyhow.

Something is happening in Memphis; something is happening in our world. And you know, if I were standing at the beginning of time, with the possibility of taking a kind of general and panoramic view of the whole of human history up to now, and the Almighty said to me, “Martin Luther King, which age would you like to live in?” I would take my mental flight by Egypt and I would watch God’s children in their magnificent trek from the dark dungeons of Egypt through, or rather across the Red Sea, through the wilderness on toward the promised land. And in spite of its magnificence, I wouldn’t stop there.

I would move on by Greece and take my mind to Mount Olympus. And I would see Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Euripides and Aristophanes assembled around the Parthenon. And I would watch them around the Parthenon as they discussed the great and eternal issues of reality. But I wouldn’t stop there.

I would go on, even to the great heyday of the Roman Empire. And I would see developments around there, through various emperors and leaders. But I wouldn’t stop there.

I would even come up to the day of the Renaissance, and get a quick picture of all that the Renaissance did for the cultural and aesthetic life of man. But I wouldn’t stop there.

I would even go by the way that the man for whom I am named had his habitat. And I would watch Martin Luther as he tacked his ninety-five theses on the door at the church of Wittenberg. But I wouldn’t stop there.

I would come on up even to 1863, and watch a vacillating President by the name of Abraham Lincoln finally come to the conclusion that he had to sign the Emancipation Proclamation. But I wouldn’t stop there.

I would even come up to the early thirties, and see a man grappling with the problems of the bankruptcy of his nation. And come with an eloquent cry that we have nothing to fear but “fear itself.” But I wouldn’t stop there.

Strangely enough, I would turn to the Almighty, and say, “If you allow me to live just a few years in the second half of the 20th century, I will be happy.”

Now that’s a strange statement to make, because the world is all messed up. The nation is sick. Trouble is in the land; confusion all around. That’s a strange statement. But I know, somehow, that only when it is dark enough can you see the stars. And I see God working in this period of the twentieth century in a way that men, in some strange way, are responding.

Something is happening in our world. The masses of people are rising up. And wherever they are assembled today, whether they are in Johannesburg, South Africa; Nairobi, Kenya; Accra, Ghana; New York City; Atlanta, Georgia; Jackson, Mississippi; or Memphis, Tennessee — the cry is always the same: “We want to be free.” (continued on page 2 or here)

Posted in Advocacy, History, Justice, protests, Race | Comments Off on Martin Luther King, Jr.’s final speech – I’ve been to the Mountaintop

Still in bloom

Below you can see that a few roses on the 4th floor patio continue to treat us even in the cold January weather! In late February or early March, these floribunda and hybrid tea roses will be pruned way back to allow for strong production in 2026. A new rose named Moondance, a creamy white with a lemony fragrance will go into one of the two new pots. The lovely Double Delight rose will be transplanted to the other new pot. So all in all, we hoping for another great season of color an fragrance on the 4th floor patio “rose garden.” Thanks to the SRA and Late Bloomers for their care and support!

Posted in Gardening | Comments Off on Still in bloom

How Governments have Caused Homelessness

By Skyline’s Michael Caplow — in Post Alley

More than 770,000 people in the US experienced homelessness in January of 2024. The causes for this epidemic have a history dating to the 1960s. It’s not just “bad choices,” laziness, or the availability of fentanyl.  It’s the result of injurious government policies, along with economic forces that have driven rents out of range for those with modest incomes.

It started with the Community Mental Health Act of 1963, which aimed to replace
outdated state mental hospitals with underfunded community-based treatment centers. This resulted in discharge of 558,000 mentally ill persons, the equivalent to roughly 1.5 million today. In 2023 state psychiatric hospitals had only 36,500 patients, primarily persons with serious mental illness. Estimates vary, but recent data indicate that 20-67% of homeless individuals have a mental health disorder.

Whatever the rationale for the 1963 legislation, the result has been transfer of the mentally ill from institutions to the streets, with states unrealistically expected to fund a replacement. Reversing this trend is hampered by the Institutions for Mental Diseases (IMD) exclusion, a Medicaid policy prohibiting federal funding for services to individuals aged 21-64 in facilities with over 16 beds primarily treating mental diseases, including substance-use disorders.

The IMD exclusion was enacted in 1965 to ensure that states, not the federal government, retained primary responsibility for funding inpatient psychiatric services. Bills to repeal the IMD failed in the three recent Congressional sessions. Politically, alternatives to repeal expanded state access entail a huge federal cost increase.

Additionally, in response to 1960’s civil unrest, rising crime and “law and order” political
rhetoric, in the form of mandatory three-strikes laws and harsher drug sentences, proliferated. As a result, the prison population increased 400% from 1970 to 2000. Because the US criminal justice system focuses on retribution and deterrence rather than rehabilitation, approximately 50% of those released are homeless within six months. For example, a 2025 San Francisco study of 1,390 previously housed adults found 25% had
homelessness records within six months after release from jail.

Governmental housing policies added to the problem. Before Reagan took office in 1980, 2.2% of the US federal budget was allocated to housing, primarily through the HUD, and that percentage fell to 0.8% in FY 2024. President Trump’s 2026 budget seeks a 44% reduction in HUD’s nondefense discretionary funding, including $27 billion less for rental assistance via block grants to states. Adjusted for inflation, HUD spending rose modestly (4.8% growth since 1980) — far slower than overall federal spending (193.7% increase).

The maldistribution of wealth has enhanced homelessness. Since 1980 the share of the top 1% pre-tax income has doubled from about 10% in 1980 to 20-22% by 2022. Meanwhile, the share of the bottom 50% fell from 20% to 12%.​ Why are we surprised that we have so many unhoused?

Posted in Government, Homeless, Mental Health | Comments Off on How Governments have Caused Homelessness

Greenland, ICE, and negative polling

Commentary by Heather Cox Richardson

After the extraordinary pushback on President Donald J. Trump’s bizarre demand for Greenland, he has responded with what economist Paul Krugman called “a howl of frustration on the part of a mad dictator who has just realized that he can’t send in the Marines.”

In a long screed this morning, Trump’s social media account said the president is placing tariffs of 10% on all goods from the countries currently protecting Greenland after February 1, and that the tariffs will increase to 25% on June 1. The post says the tariffs will be in effect “until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.”

This post is bonkers on many levels. On the most basic: where is he thinking he’s going to find the money for “the complete and total purchase of Greenland?” And besides, the countries involved—Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom—are all U.S. allies. Economist Justin Wolfers notes this trade war will include the entire European Union, for “[a] trade war with one EU country is a trade war with the entire EU.”

The post also makes explicit that Trump is trying to use tariffs not to nurture the American economy but to force other countries to do his bidding. The question of whether his tariff wars are constitutional because they address what he claims is an economic emergency is currently before the Supreme Court. Two lower courts have found that the president does not have the power to levy the sweeping tariffs he has been announcing. Today’s tariff announcement does not refer at all to economic need but rather is about economic coercion.

Finally, in its insistence that only the U.S. can “protect” Greenland, the screed echoed Russian president Vladimir Putin’s promises to “protect” Ukraine. Ignoring the reality that Greenland is part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the world’s strongest defense alliance, it said that Greenland and Denmark, of which Greenland is a part, “currently have two dogsleds as protection, one added recently.” It also added that the protection Trump insists only U.S. ownership of Greenland can provide might also include “the possible protection of Canada.” (continued on Page 2 or here)

Posted in Government | Comments Off on Greenland, ICE, and negative polling

“I’ve won majors, walked on the moon and have finally been recognized as Best in Show”

Thanks to John R.

Posted in Satire | Comments Off on “I’ve won majors, walked on the moon and have finally been recognized as Best in Show”

It’s the Cynicism

by Joyce Vance (thanks to Mary M.)

It seems to be everywhere you look, across the political spectrum. Far too many people don’t believe in anything anymore. They’ve lost faith in everything: our institutions, our values, and even each other. We’ve become a country of cynics.

One of the first posts I saw this morning on social media was about a well-documented instance where a Minnesota family’s six children were hospitalized after their minivan filled with smoke and tear gas fired by federal agents. Below the news report, someone had dismissed it in the comments: “I don’t believe it.” That was it. No explanation, nothing that cast doubt on the reporting. Just a rejection.

A little bit further down, someone had written about diminishing confidence in the Justice Department. A commentator wrote, “Did anyone believe in that anyway?”

We have become a nation of skeptics, of cynics. We are jaded. It’s all around us.

In her essay, Truth and Politics, Hannah Arendt wrote, “The result of a consistent and total substitution of lies for factual truth is not that the lie will now be accepted as truth and truth be defamed as a lie, but that the sense by which we take our bearings in the real world—and the category of truth versus falsehood is among the mental means to this end—is being destroyed.”

The President spews lies so constantly and so casually that it’s easy to understand how people can lose their bearings. It’s an assumption that Trump lies, not something unusual. That’s the President of the United States!

One manifestation of the lies we’ve become so inured to is the destruction of confidence in our elections. Trump has lied for so long about voter fraud, about non-citizens voting (the evidence does not back that claim up), about voting machines, about stolen elections, that it has permeated the national consciousness and even when people see through the lies, a miasma of distrust for the entire process remains. And of course, it’s not just elections.

Who benefits from a loss of faith in our institutions and in our ability to come out on the other end of this national nightmare with an intact republic? It’s not hard to see. It’s the man who enjoys upsetting the balance of power guarded by NATO because he wants to own Greenland. The man who tears down the East Wing. The man who won’t release the Epstein Files.

At this stage, Trump no longer cares if people believe his lies. He just needs the chaos they generate and the absence of shared truths, shared facts, in our country. People who can no longer discern what’s true from what’s false lose their moral compasses, like the agents who are now shooting at the people they took an oath to protect and serve. It all benefits a leader who wants to take authoritarian control of a democracy.

Giving up your belief in how things should be is dangerous.

I’m not suggesting everyone should have blind faith in our institutions, far from it at this point. But we need to be aware of what’s broken and needs mending without getting stuck on it. Instead of succumbing to cynicism, let’s stay focused on what we can do, even the small things.

Be kind, share joy. Register to vote and make sure everyone around you does, too. We know what this is going to take, but we have to stop the spread of cynicism around us. We’ve come too far in the last year to accept Trump’s success as inevitable.

In the coming week, we will mark the one-year anniversary of the second Trump administration. Find your own way to protest it. Donate to a food bank. Help a neighbor out, or help someone you’ve never met but have empathy for. Sign up to work at a polling place, or decide to run for office. There is so much that we can do. What we cannot afford to do is to let a man who thinks of no one but himself win.

refer to caption
The Declaration of Independence

This year is the 250th anniversary of our country’s founding. In the Declaration of Independence, wise men wrote, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” As wise people, we understand how important these words are; they are not just words children memorize and recite. Let’s make them our living, breathing truth as we watch what’s happening in Minneapolis and elsewhere. Let’s gently remind the cynics of what’s possible and get them off of the sidelines, where they are dragging others down. Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

We’re in this together,

Joyce

Posted in Advocacy, Communication, Essays, Government, Justice, Kindness, Law, Media | Comments Off on It’s the Cynicism

Important to advocate for this legislation

from Rick B. and the WACCRA leadership

We ask that you contact the legislature regarding HB 2384 before the end of the day on Thursday, 22 January.WACCRA worked with Rep. Macri who has submitted HB2384 to the current legislative session, this bill which will strengthen the legal protections for CCRCs such as Skyline.  The bill has been accepted for a hearing by the House Committee on Health Care and Wellness that is scheduled for 8:00 am on Friday, 23 January.  It is important that the committee know that a large number of citizens care that the bill gets passed  prior to that hearing.

We hope you are in favor of this bill which will provide two improvements on the current regulatory status:

1.  Improve the registration process, required every two years for each CCRC.

2.  Require an actuarial analysis every two registration periods.

If in favor, please register you opinion as PRO.  Else, register as CON.

You will be asked to fill-in your identifying information.

To initiate the registration process, go to the website: https://leg.wa.gov/bills-meetings-and-session/ and enter the Bill Number “2384”.

We have attached a sequence of screen shots that illustrate the process in detail.

We hope you will all respond to this request.  We think it is very important that the legislature understands the importance of this proposed legislation to us.

If you would like help to register your opinion:

The WACCRA Liaison Committee will provide hands-on assistance on Tuesday, 20 January.  A committee member will be available outside the CDR during lunch and dinner service and in the Sound Bar during dinner service.

Thank you for your assistance

WACCRA Liaison Committee

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Important to advocate for this legislation

Reverberations from he who would be king

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reverberations from he who would be king

Let’s have an ICE Tea Party–and throw them overboard!

Thanks to Dan S.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Let’s have an ICE Tea Party–and throw them overboard!

Trump in the World 2.0 Winter Lecture Series 2026

Thanks to Gene W.

An online series of talks and discussion featuring guest speakers and faculty exploring global perspectives on a second Trump administration.

Moderator: Danny Hoffman, Director of the Jackson School of International Studies and Stanley D. Golub Chair of International Studies 

Join us every Monday from January 12 – March 9, 2026 (Exceptions: Jan. 19 and Feb. 16 – National Holidays)

UW students: Interested in taking this as a 2-credit/no credit course? Go to MyPlan for full course details.

Register Now

Already registered?

Lectures are available to the public via livestream only.

Sponsored by the Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies and UW Global at the University of Washington.

You can view event details and learn more about the speakers by clicking on Lecture Series and Speakers at the top of this page in the purple banner.

You may also view each session by clicking the Register Now button.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Trump in the World 2.0 Winter Lecture Series 2026

Here’s your survival kit

Thanks to John R.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment